Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Inquiry on the Types of Subjectivity on Edutainment Features of Software Education in Elementary School

초등학교 소프트웨어 교육에서 에듀테인먼트 특성에 대한 주관성 유형 탐색

  • Received : 2017.06.26
  • Accepted : 2017.12.14
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the types of subjectivity on edutainment features of software education implemented in elementary school. Q-method is used to seek individual learners' subjectivity type. Three types of subjectivity are found: implementation type, intellectual-fun type, and relationship type. Implementation type learners show positive attitude toward making their thinking into realization, intellectual-fun type learners show positive attitude toward solving problems that require intellectual activities, and relationship type learners show positive toward other persons' attention and consideration. These results imply software education will be more enhanced with these three types considered for implementing software education in elementary schools. This study is expected to contribute to further following research and practices.

본 연구의 목적은 소프트웨어교육에 나타나는 에듀테인먼트 특성을 Q방법론을 활용하여 학습자의 주관성에 따라 유형화하고 각각의 특성을 알아보는 데 있다. 연구를 통해 '구현-지향형', '지적재미-지향형', '관계-지향형' 세 가지로 유형화하였으며 각 유형별 특성을 분석하였다. 구현-지향형의 학습자는 본인이 생각한 것을 직접 구현해 보는 것에서 에듀테인먼트적 긍정성을 보였으며, 지적재미-지향형의 학습자는 주어진 개별적 문제 상황을 지적으로 해결하는 것에서 에듀테인먼트적으로 가장 긍정적이었고, 관계-지향형 학습자의 경우에는 본인에 대해 다른 사람의 관심을 유발하는 수업에 대해서 에듀테인먼트적인 긍정성을 보였다. 이 같은 결과는 소프트웨어교육을 하는 데 있어서 학습자의 주관성을 고려한 에듀테인먼트 콘텐츠 개발 및 교수-학습 방법을 적용하여 학습자에게 최적의 교육 환경을 제공하는 데 중요한 지침을 제공하고, 또한 소프트웨어교육 및 에듀테인먼트 연구의 이론적 확장에 기여할 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergmann, L., Clifford, D. & Wolff, C. (2010). Edutainment and Teen Modeling May Spark Interest in Nutrition & Physical Activity in Elementary School Audiences. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 42(2), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2009.10.001
  2. Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P. & Tavernise, A. (2012). Motivating the learning of science topics in secondary school: A constructivist edutainment setting for studying Chaos. Computers & Education, 59, 1377-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.001
  3. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  4. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  5. Chulhyun Lee (2015). Direction and Model of Software Education in Elementary Education. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 28(4), 207-222.
  6. Cirigliano, M. M. (2012). Exploring the Attitudes of Students Using an Edutainment Graphic Novel as a Supplement to Learning in the Classroom. Science Educator, 21(1), 29-36.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. NY: Harper&Row.
  8. Daehoon Kwon (2011). Statistics for social science. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  9. Eastin, M. (2006). Video game violence and the female game player: Self and opponent gender effects on presence and aggressive thouths. Human Communication Research, 32(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00279.x
  10. Garrett, M. & Ezzo, M. (1996). Edutainment: the challenge. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 8(3), 3-7.
  11. Gyosik Moon (2013). On the Direction of the Application of the Concepts of Computational Thinking for Elementary Education. Journal of The Korea Contents Association, 13(6), 518-526. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.06.518
  12. HanSung Kim (2016). A Study of the Direction for Developing Software Education Operating Guide. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 529-548.
  13. Heesook Ahn, Yoomi Choi (2014). Analysis of Educational Characteristics of Augmented Reality Edutainment Contents according to Interaction Type. The Korean Journal of animation, 10(4), 152-169.
  14. Heonsu Kim, Yumi won (2000). Q-Methodology. Seoul: Kyoyookgbook.
  15. Heunggyu Kim (2008). Q methodology : philosophy, theories, analysis, and application. Seoul: CommunicationBooks.
  16. Hyungshin Choi, Inkee Jeong, Hyojeong So (2014). Computational Thinking Framework-based Analysis of Afterschool Scratch Team Project Experiences. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 549-558. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.549
  17. Inhwan yoo (2014). Design a Programming Education Plan for SW Education Using Robot and Mobile Application Development Tool. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.615
  18. Jarvin, L. (2015). Edutainment, games, and the future of education in a digital world. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), The global context for new directions for child and adolescent development. New Directions for child and Adolescent Development, 147, 33-40.
  19. Jungho Park (2015). Effects of Storytelling Based Software Education of Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.57
  20. Jungsook Sung, Hyeoncheol Kim (2015). Analysis on the International Comparison of Computer Education in Schools. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 18(1), 45-54.
  21. Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. LD&NY: Routledge.
  22. Korean Educational Psychology Association (2000). Glossary of terms of Educational Psychology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  23. Labus, A., Despotovic-Zrakic, M., Radenkovic, B., Bogdanoovic, Z. & Radenkovict, M. (2015). Enhancing formal e-learning with edutainment on social networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 592-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12108
  24. MOE (2015). 2015 Revised National Primary School Curriculum. Korean Ministry of Education.
  25. Nachimuthu, K. & Vijayakumari, G. (2011). Role of Educational Games improves Meaningful Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 25-33.
  26. Sangho Song (2008). Preliminary Study for the Design of Digital Edutainment Content. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(2), 159-188.
  27. Sangho Song (2012). Exploring the features of edutainment for Robot Assisted Instruction. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 18(4), 389-416.
  28. Sangho Song, Byungkuk Son (2015). Study on the Edutainment Features Implemented in the Game-Based Education Program - A Case of Zumbini. CONTENTS PLUS, 13(2), 35-67.
  29. Sang-jin Oh (2003). Development an Animation Programming Curriculum for the Elementary Gifted Children of Information Science. Gyeongin National University of Education Master's Thesis.
  30. Seongtaek Park, Hyeyoung Kwon, Taeung Kim, Woojung Jang (2012). A Study on the Attitude toward Online Game-based Edutainment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(3), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.3.251
  31. Software Policy & Research Institute (2014). Software oriented Society. SPRi Issue Report 2014-003.
  32. Soohwan Kim, Seonkwan Han (2014). A Perception on SW Education of Students with Scratch-Day. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.267
  33. Soonhyung Yi, Bongyeon Suh, Soeun Lee, Miyong Sung (1999). Effects of Computer Game on Children's Spatial Skills and Short-term Memory Abiliby. Korean Association of Child Studies, 20(3), 293-306.
  34. Suneun Kim (2010). The Theory and Philosophy of Q-Methodology . Korean society and public administration, 20(4), 1-25.
  35. Sungho Kwon, Jiyoon Lee (2002). An Inquiry on the Type of Learning Motivation in Web-Based Instruction: Applied to Q Methodology. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.18.2.21
  36. Sungjoong Kang, Cheolsoo Cho (2007). A Study on Design Elements for Edutainment Based on Flow Theory for Game. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY DESIGN CULTURE 13(3), 39-48.
  37. Taeok Song (2015). The Purpose and Direction of Software Education. The Journal of Korean association of computer education Conference Report, 19(2), 23-26.
  38. Watts, S. & Stenner, P. (2014). Doing Q methodological research : theory, method and interpretation. CA : SAGE.
  39. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions 366(1881), 3717-3726. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  40. Yeongkyun Baek (2005). Edutainment. Seoul: jungilbooks.
  41. Yongju Jeon, Taeyoung Kim (2014). The Understanding of Software Education by the Analysis of International Trends. The Korean Association of Computer Education Conference Report, 18(2), 137-142.
  42. Younghwan Kim, Youngjin Kim, Mi Shon, Jisun Jung (2008). Reconceptualizing the concept of Edutainment. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(4), 173-192.
  43. Youngmi Kang, Myongcheol Son (2012). The Application and Effect of Teaching-Learning Model Used Games in Geography Subject-Focused on Geography in Middle School Textbook. Journal of educational Research Institute, 14(1), 1-24.

Cited by

  1. 컴퓨터 비전공자를 위한 기초 코딩 교육에서 학습자의 시각적 문해력과 사고 유형이 프로그램 이해와 작성에 미치는 영향 분석 vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.2.001