Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine

The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine (대한생식의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles according to the presence of morphokinetic variables

  • Received : 2017.09.19
  • Accepted : 2018.01.15
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study retrospectively assessed whether time-lapse data relating to developmental timing and morphology were associated with clinical outcomes, with the eventual goal of using morphokinetic variables to select embryos prospectively for cryopreservation. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles that were cultured in a time-lapse incubation system. The morphokinetic variables included uneven pronuclei, an uneven blastomere, multinucleation, and direct, rapid, and irregular division. A total of 164 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were analyzed (102 cycles of regularly developed blastocysts and 62 cycles of blastocysts with morphokinetic variables). No significant differences in the age of females or the standard blastocyst morphology were found between these two groups. The regularly developed blastocysts showed significantly higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than the blastocysts exhibiting morphokinetic variables (30.4% vs. 9.7% and 37.3% vs. 14.5%, respectively; p< 0.01). The blastocysts that exhibited morphokinetic variables showed different mean development times compared with the regularly developed blastocysts. Although morphokinetic variables are known to have fatal impacts on embryonic development, a considerable number of embryos developed to the blastocyst stage. Morphokinetic variables had negative effects on the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. These findings suggest that blastocysts cultured in a time-lapse incubation system should be considered for selective cryopreservation according to morphokinetic variables.

Keywords

References

  1. Haikin Herzberger E, Ghetler Y, Tamir Yaniv R, Berkovitz A, Gonen O, Cohen I, et al. Time lapse microscopy is useful for elective single-embryo transfer. Gynecol Endocrinol 2016;32:816-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1188375
  2. Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem339
  3. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
  4. Goto S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M. Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2011;95:948-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.067
  5. Nakahara T, Iwase A, Goto M, Harata T, Suzuki M, Ienaga M, et al. Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:93-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9385-8
  6. Manor D, Drugan A, Stein D, Pillar M, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Unequal pronuclear size: a powerful predictor of embryonic chromosome anomalies. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999;16:385-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020550115345
  7. Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, Garrisi GJ, Mack C, Scott RT. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril 1999;71:836-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00092-8
  8. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:313-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.2.313
  9. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Ryckaert G, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1062-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg201
  10. Yakin K, Balaban B, Urman B. Impact of the presence of one or more multinucleated blastomeres on the developmental potential of the embryo to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 2005;83:243-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.016
  11. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
  12. Hur YS, Ryu EK, Song SH, Yoon SH, Lim KS, Lee WD, et al. A retrospective study of single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2016;43:106-11. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.106
  13. Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2658-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der256
  14. Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1295-300.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1235
  15. Ergin EG, Caliskan E, Yalcinkaya E, Oztel Z, Cokelez K, Ozay A, et al. Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by timelapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1029-33.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.030
  16. Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escriba MJ, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1458-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1135

Cited by

  1. Between-laboratory reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection using qualitative and quantitative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.37, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01789-4