The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

What is the changing frequency of diamond burs?

  • Emir, Faruk (Department of Prosthodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Ayyildiz, Simel (Department of Prosthodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Sahin, Cem (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University)
  • Received : 2017.05.12
  • Accepted : 2017.08.29
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine the changing frequency of a diamond bur after multiple usages on 3 different surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Human premolar teeth (N = 26), disc shaped direct metal laser sintered CoCr (N = 3) and zirconia specimens (N = 3) were used in this study. Groups named basically as Group T for teeth, Group M for CoCr, and Group Z for zirconia. Round tapered black-band diamond bur was used. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups and placed with a special assembly onto the surveyor. 1, 5, and 10 preparation protocols were performed to the first, second, and third sub-groups, respectively. The subgroups were named according to preparation numbers (1, 5, 10). The mentioned bur of each group was then used at another horizontal preparation on a new tooth sample. The same procedure was used for CoCr and zirconia disc specimens. All of the bur surfaces were evaluated using roughness analysis. Then, horizontal tooth preparation surfaces were examined under both stereomicroscope and SEM. The depth maps of tooth surfaces were also obtained from digital stereomicroscopic images. The results were statistically analyzed using One-Way ANOVA, and the Tukey HSD post-hoc tests (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. All of the groups were significantly different from the control group (P<.001). There was no significant difference between groups Z5 and Z10 (P=.928). Significant differences were found among groups T5, M5, and Z5 (P<.001). CONCLUSION. Diamond burs wear after multiple use and they should be changed after 5 teeth preparations at most. A diamond bur should not be used for teeth preparation after try-in procedures of metal or zirconia substructures.

Keywords

References

  1. Sharma S, Shankar R, Srinivas K. An epidemiological study on the selection, usage and disposal of dental burs among the dental practioner's. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:250-4.
  2. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch? J Prosthodont 1999;8:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00002.x
  3. Borges CF, Magne P, Pfender E, Heberlein J. Dental diamond burs made with a new technology. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70130-7
  4. Bae JH, Yi J, Kim S, Shim JS, Lee KW. Changes in the cutting efficiency of different types of dental diamond rotary instrument with repeated cuts and disinfection. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.002
  5. Nakamura K, Katsuda Y, Ankyu S, Harada A, Tenkumo T, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Egusa H, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Cutting efficiency of diamond burs operated with electric high-speed dental handpiece on zirconia. Eur J Oral Sci 2015 Aug 28.
  6. Klimek L, Banaszek K. The mechanisms of wear in burs with diamond grits. J Superhard Mater 2007;29:185-8. https://doi.org/10.3103/S106345760703015X
  7. Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ, Ritter AV. Sturdevant's arts and science of operative dentistry. 6th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2013. p. 164-85.
  8. Bhagat TV, Thombare R. A comparative evaluation of functional efficiency of diamond bur used with distilled water, distilled water modified by addition of mouthwash and lactated ringer solution as coolants. An in-vitro study. Inter J Dent Clin 2012;4:6-9.
  9. Leonard DL, Charlton DG. Performance of high-speed dental handpieces subjected to simulated clinical use and sterilization. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1301-11. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0400
  10. Waqar A, Sein H, Jackson MJ, Rego C, Phoenix DA, Elhissi A, Crean J. Chemical vapour deposition of diamond for dental tools and burs springer brief in materials. 1st ed. London; Springer; 2014. p. 19-48.
  11. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Effect of handpiece load on the cutting efficiency of dental burs. Machining Sci Technol 1997;1:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10940349708945634
  12. Galindo DF, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Greene TD, Moss ME, Lee HJ, Ben-Hanan U, Graser GN, Barzilay I. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs. J Prosthodont 2004;13:3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04003.x
  13. Laforgia PD, Milano V, Morea C, Desiate A. Temperature change in the pulp chamber during complete crown preparation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90048-2
  14. Kiran J, Chiranjeevi R, Vahini R, Chandrasekharan NK. Changes in the Diamond bur before and after tooth preparation. Trends Prosthodont Dent Implantol 2014;5:18-21.
  15. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:116-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70223-3
  16. Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:377-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01257.x
  17. Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A, Poursoltan S. Effect of dentin surface roughness on the shear bond strength of resin bonded restorations. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:224-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.224
  18. McInnes PM, Wendt SL Jr, Retief DH, Weinberg R. Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. Dent Mater 1990;6:204-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90031-9
  19. Sola-Ruiz MF, Faus-Matoses I, Del Rio Highsmith J, Fons-Font A. Study of surface topography, roughness, and microleakage after dental preparation with different instrumentation. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27:530-3. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3932
  20. Siegel SC, Von Fraunhofer JA. Dental cutting: the historical development of diamond burs. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:740-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0316
  21. Pilcher ES, Tietge JD, Draughn RA. Comparison of cutting rates among single-patient-use and multiple-patient-use diamond burs. J Prosthodont 2000;9:66-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2000.00066.x
  22. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Assessing the cutting efficiency of dental diamond burs. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:763-72. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0312
  23. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Comparison of sectioning rates among carbide and diamond burs using three casting alloys. J Prosthodont 1999;8:240-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00045.x
  24. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Cutting efficiency of three diamond bur grit sizes. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1706-10. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0116
  25. Sein H, Ahmed W, Jackson M, Woodwards R, Polini R. Performance and characterisation of CVD diamond coated, sintered diamond and WC-Co cutting tools for dental and micromachining applications. Thin Solid Films 2004;447-8:455-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2003.08.044
  26. Taylor DF, Perkins RR, Kumpula JW. Characteristics of some air-turbine handpieces. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:794-805. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0173
  27. Brockhurst PJ, Shams R. Dynamic measurement of the torque-speed characteristics of dental high speed air turbine handpieces. Aust Dent J 1994;39:33-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1994.tb05544.x
  28. Choi C, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60013-3
  29. Ottl P, Lauer HC. Temperature response in the pulpal chamber during ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation with diamond burs of different grit. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70085-X
  30. Ozturk B, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Ozer F. In vitro assess- ment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:436-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.022
  31. Ercoli C, Rotella M, Funkenbusch PD, Russell S, Feng C. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:248-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60049-4
  32. Yin L, Jahanmir S, Ives LK. Abrasive machining of porcelain and zirconia with a dental handpiece. Wear 2003:975-89.
  33. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90087-6
  34. Al-Omari WM, Mitchell CA, Cunningham JL. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:645-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00722.x
  35. Ayyildiz S, Soylu EH, Ide S, Kilic S, Sipahi C, Piskin B, Gokce HS. Annealing of Co-Cr dental alloy: effects on nanostructure and Rockwell hardness. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:471-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.471
  36. Gutierrez-Salazar M, Reyes-Gasga J. Microhardness and chemical composition of human tooth. Mat Res 2003;6:367-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392003000300011
  37. Craig RG, Peyton FA. The microhardness of enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1958;37:661-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345580370041301
  38. Ohkuma K, Kazama M, Ogura H. The grinding efficiency by diamond points developed for yttria partially stabilized zirconia. Dent Mater J 2011;30:511-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-152

Cited by

  1. Cutting efficiency of welded diamond and vacuum diffusion technology burs and conventional electroplated burs on the surface changes of the teeth - An In vitro study vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_261_20