DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of a Diet Improvement Method for Controlling High Sodium Intake Based on Protective Motivation Theory

  • 투고 : 2018.02.28
  • 심사 : 2018.03.27
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30

초록

고염식식습관은 다양한 질병을 일으키고 공중보건을 위협할 수 있다. 그 동안 고염식식습관을 통제하기 위한 다양한 시도가 이루어져 왔으나 건강커뮤니케이션을 통해 고염식식습관을 변화시킬 수 있는지에 대한 연구는 아직 이루어지지 못하였다. 본 연구는 고염식의위험성과 식습관의 통제가능성에 대한 인식이 고염식식습관을 얼마나 예측하는지를 검토함으로써 식습관 개선 교육을 위한 시사점을 찾고자 하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 보호동기 이론의 하위요인인심각성, 취약성, 효율성, 효능 및 행동 경향을 측정하기 위한 설문지를 개발하였으며 설문지를 충남소재 대학의 대학생들과 그들의 가족을 대상으로 배포하였다. 설문결과를 SPSS프로그램으로 분석한 결과를 보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 청년층은 장년층보다 나트륨섭취가 더 많았다. 둘째, 상관관계분석에서 장년층은 고염식으로 인한 위험에 취약하다는 것을 알고 있지만 고염식을 억제할 수 있다고 확신할 때 까지는 식습관을 바꾸지 않는다. 셋째, 구조모델분석에 따르면 대처지각이 높을수록 고염식식습관의 경향성이 낮아지는 경향을 보인다. 이 결과는 고염식식습관을 줄이기 위해서는 실행 가능한 정보를 제공하고 저염식을 하였을 때 어떤 변화가 발생하는지를 인식 시킴으로써 대처지각을 높이는 방안이 더 효과적임을 시사한다.

High sodium dietary habits may cause various diseases, thereby threatening the public health. Various efforts have been made to control high sodium use in diets, but few studies have been conducted on health communication efforts to modify such habits. This study looks for suggestions for diet improvement education by examining whether or not high sodium dietary habits can be predicted by a consumer's perception on the threat and controllability of high sodium diets. In this study, a questionnaire was developed to measure the severity, vulnerability, efficiency, efficacy, and behavioral tendencies of the consumer, which were subscales of the protective motivation theory. The questionnaire was given to university students and their families in Chungnam Province. The results of a statistical analysis were as follows: First, more young people preferred high-sodium diets than older people. Second, the correlation analysis showed that older people knew that they were vulnerable to the negative effects of high sodium diets, but they would not change their dietary habits until they were confident that they could control the high-sodium diet. Third, the structural model analysis showed that the higher the coping perception was, the lower was the tendency to consume a high-sodium diet. These results suggest that in the effort to reduce high-sodium diets, it is more effective to provide viable information and improve efficacy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Drewnowski, A.: Taste preferences and food. Annual review of nutrition 17, 253-237 (1997).
  2. Mordecai, P.B, M.D. and John, M. Ph.D.: Role of a natriuretic factor in essential hypertension: An hypothesis Ann Intern Med. 98(5_Part_2), 785-792 (1983). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-98-5-785
  3. National Health Insurance Corporation http://www.newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20170614_0000012599&cID=10201&pID=10200 Accessed June 15 (2017).
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Food & Drug Administration Press, (2012).
  5. Rogers, R.W.: A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied 91, 93-114 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
  6. Gibbons, F.X., Houlihan, A.L., Gerrar, M.: Reason and reaction: The utility of a dual-focus, dual-processing perspective on promotion and prevention of adolescent health risk behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology 14, 231-248 (2010).
  7. Feigelman, S., Li, X., Stanton, B.: Perceived risks and benefits of an alcohol, cigarette, and drug use among urban lowincome African-American early adolescents. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 72(1), 57-75 (1995).
  8. Kim, K.S., Paik, H.Y.: A comparative study on optimum qustation of salt and sodium intake in young and middle aged Korean women. Korean J. Nutr. 25:1, 32-41 (1992).
  9. Bang, J.H.: A behavioral research for the college students' interest of health information: Focused on the protection motivation theory. Ph D Dissertation Seokyung University. 80-84 (2015).
  10. Allen, I., Elaine, S., Christopher, A.: Quality Progress; Milwaukee 40.7, 64-65 Likert Scales and Data Analyses (Jul 2007).
  11. Shavit, Y., Martin, F.C.: Opiates, stress, and immunity: Animal studies. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 9:2, 11-15 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm0902_2