Journal of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회지:중재연구)

The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies (한국중재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Overview for the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) as the Authority to Settle the Sports-related Disputes

스포츠분쟁해결기구로서의 스포츠중재재판소(CAS)에 관한 고찰

  • 손창주 (동국대학교 대학원 법학과, 법무법인 천고)
  • Received : 2018.02.10
  • Accepted : 2018.02.27
  • Published : 2018.03.02
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) was created to focus on the procedural complexity in the resolution of sports-related disputes, confidentiality, the matter of expenses, and the necessity of prompt settlement in the field of international sports. The CAS had originally launched as one of bodies of International Olympic Committee (IOC), but later it became properly operational as an independent organization to facilitate sports-related disputes when the International Council of Arbitration for Sport (ICAS), which came into force in accordance with the Paris Agreement in 1984 and has acted in place of IOC, took responsibility for the administration and financing of the CAS. The CAS is composed of four divisions, the Ordinary Arbitration Division and the Appeals Arbitration Division, the Ad hoc Division created later in 1996 and the CAS Anti-Doping Division (CAS ADD) established as from 2016 only to conduct proceedings and to issue decisions on an alleged anti-doping rule violation, and two (Sydney and New York) permanent decentralized offices. The head office of the CAS is Lausanne, Switzerland. Since CAS ADD was established, CAS Ad hoc Division has had jurisdiction over the appeal case against a decision pronounced by the IOC, an NOC, an international Federation or an Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games. Although there are so many virtues of CAS as a resolution authority for sports-related disputes in terms of its organization, arbitration rules and procedures, it is also true that the CAS has not been showing the consistency. The CAS should overcome these issues through much more advanced system and its instant and fair decisions.

Keywords

References

  1. 강병근, "스포츠중재재판소(CAS)를 통한 스포츠분쟁의 처리", 스포츠와 법, 제5권, 한국스포츠법학회, 2004.
  2. 김대희, "국내 스포츠분쟁해결기구의 설치에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 제24권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2014.
  3. 김상겸, "스포츠분쟁해결에 관한 헌법적 연구", 스포츠와 법, 제5권, 한국스포츠법학회, 2004.
  4. 김용길, "ADR을 활용한 스포츠사건의 해결에 관한 고찰-중재제도를 중심으로-", 중재연구, 제21권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2011.
  5. 김용섭, "교육, 문화 및 스포츠의 글로벌 법적 이슈에 관한 고찰", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법 제18권 제4호, 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회, 2015.
  6. 김용섭, "국제스포츠중재재판소(CAS)를 통한 분쟁해결과 불복절차-독일 빙상선수 Claudia Pechstein의 도핑사례 분석을 겸하여-", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 제19권 제4호(통권 제49호), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회, 2016.
  7. 김종호, "국제스포츠에 있어서 중재를 통한 분쟁의 해결-유럽의 프로축구분쟁관련 중재절차를 중심으로-", 외법논집, 제35권 제2호, 한국외국어대학교법학연구소, 2011.
  8. 김철, "IOC의 국제법상 지위", 스포츠와 법, 제13권 제4호, 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회, 2010.
  9. 연기영, "국제스포츠중재재판소(CAS)에 비추어 본 한국스포츠중재위원회(KCAS)의 역할과 과제", 스포츠와 법, 제11권 제1호(통권 제14호), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회, 2008.
  10. 연기영, "2016리오올림픽 국제스포츠중재재판소 반도핑중재부의 규정과 활동", 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법, 제20권, 제1호(통권 제50호), 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회, 2017.
  11. 전홍구, "스포츠중재의 필요성과 중재합의에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 제26권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2016.
  12. 지철호, "ADR을 통한 스포츠분쟁해결에 관한 연구",동국대 박사학위논문, 2015.
  13. Ian S. Blackshaw, Robert C. R. Siekmann & Janwillem Soek, "The Court of Arbitration for Sport 1984-2004 (Editors), TMC Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2006.
  14. Ettinger, David J. "The Legal Status of the International Olympic Committee, 4 Pace Y.B. Int'l L. 97, 1992.
  15. James, Mark et al., "Sports Law, 3rd ed, Cavendish Publishing, 2006. Reeb, Mattieu, "The Role and Functions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS)", in The Court of Arbitration for Sport 1984-2004, TMC Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2006.
  16. Nafziger, James A.R. "International Sports Law", 2nd ed, Transnational Publishers, Inc. 2004.
  17. Yeun, Kee-Young, "The Developement of International Sports Arbitration Bodies and Challenges of Legislative Policy for Reestablishment of Sports Arbitration Agency in Korea", Journal of Arbitration Studies, Vol. 23 No.3, The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies, 2013.