Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.349-360
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic collapse safety of high-rise RC moment frames supported on two ground levels

  • Wu, Yun-Tian (Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education: School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Zhou, Qing (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Wang, Bin (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Yang, Yeong-Bin (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University) ;
  • Lan, Tian-Qing (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.24
  • 심사 : 2018.03.07
  • 발행 : 2018.04.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Reinforced concrete (RC) moment frames supported on two ground levels have been widely constructed in mountainous areas with medium to high seismicity in China. In order to investigate the seismic collapse behavior and risk, a scaled frame model was tested under constant axial load and reversed cyclic lateral load. Test results show that the failure can be induced by the development of story yielding at the first story above the upper ground. The strong column and weak beam mechanism can be well realized at stories below the upper ground. Numerical analysis model was developed and calibrated with the test results. Three pairs of six case study buildings considering various structural configurations were designed and analyzed, showing similar dynamic characteristics between frames on two ground levels and flat ground of each pair. Incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) were then conducted to obtain the seismic collapse fragility curves and collapse margin ratios of nine analysis cases designated based on the case study buildings, considering amplification of earthquake effect and strengthening measures. Analysis results indicate that the seismic collapse safety is mainly determined by the stories above the upper ground. The most probable collapse mechanism may be induced by the story yielding of the bottom story on the upper ground level. The use of tie beam and column strengthening can effectively enhance the seismic collapse safety of frames on two ground levels.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Ministry of Science & Technology of China, National Science Foundation of China

참고문헌

  1. Azarbakht, A. and Dolsek, M. (2011), "Progressive incremental dynamic analysis for first-mode dominated structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 137(3), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000282
  2. Bouckovalas, G.D. and Papadimitriou, A.G. (2005), "Numerical evaluation of slop topography effects on seismic ground motion", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25, 547-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.008
  3. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Parisi, F. and Augenti, N. (2015), "Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis", Eng. Struct., 104, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.024
  4. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2001), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 561-582.
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2009), Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters (FEMA-P695, ATC-63), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  6. GB 50010 (2010), Code for Design of Concrete Structures, Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development, Beijing, China.
  7. GB 50011 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Building, Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development, Beijing, China.
  8. Geli, L., Bard, P.Y. and Jullien, B. (1988), "The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78(1), 42-63.
  9. Goulet, C.A., Haselton, C.B., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J.L., Deierlein, G.G., Porter, K.A. and Stewart, J.P. (2007), "Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 1973-1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.694
  10. Harrington, C.C. and Liel, A.B. (2016), "Collapse assessment of moment frame buildings, considering vertical ground shaking", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45, 2475-2493. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2776
  11. Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Deierlein, G.G., Dean, B.S. and Chou, J.H. (2011), "Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 137(4), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318
  12. Krawinkler, H. and Zareian, F. (2007), "Prediction of collapsehow realistic and practical is it, and what can we learn from it?", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 16, 633-653. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.433
  13. Kulkarni, S.A., Li, B. and Yip, W.K. (2008), "Finite element analysis of precast hybrid-steel concrete connections under cyclic loading", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(2), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.05.002
  14. Lan, W., Ma, J. and Li, B. (2015), "Seismic performance of steelconcrete composite structural walls with internal bracings", J. Constr. Steel Res., 110, 76-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.015
  15. Liao, K.W., Wen, Y.K. and Foutch, D.A. (2007), "Evaluation of 3D steel moment frames under earthquake excitations. I: Modeling", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 133(3), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:3(471)
  16. Liel, A.B., Haselton, C.B., Deierlein, G.G., Dean, B.S. and Baker, J.W. (2009), "Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings", Struct. Saf., 31, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002
  17. Mander, J.B., Priestly, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  18. Mojiri, S., El-Dakhakhni, W.W. and Tait, M.J. (2014), "Seismic fragility evaluation of lightly reinforced concrete-block shear walls for probabilistic risk assessment", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 141(4), 1-13.
  19. Nguyen, K.V. and Gatmiri, B. (2007), "Evaluation of seismic ground motion induced by topographic irregularity", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 27, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.005
  20. Paolucci, R. (2002), "Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 1831-1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.192
  21. Seismosoft (2015), SeismoStruct-a Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structrues.
  22. Shome, N. and Cornell, C.A. (1999), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of non-linear structures", Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford.
  23. Siyam, M.A., Konstantinidis, D. and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2016), "Collapse fragility evaluation of ductile reinforced concrete block wall systems for seismic risk assessment", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 30(6), 1-14.
  24. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  25. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2004), "Applied incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Spectra, 20(2), 523-553. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737737
  26. Villaverde, R. (2007), "Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures. State of the Art", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 133(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(57)
  27. Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2007), "Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1901-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic performance and improvements of split-foundation buildings in across-slope direction vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219881754
  2. Seismic fragility analysis of RC frame-core wall buildings under the combined vertical and horizontal ground motions vol.20, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.2.175