DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Hydrogen Crossover Current Density by Analysis Method of Linear Sweep Voltammetry(LSV) in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

고분자전해질연료전지에서 선형주사전압전류측정법(LSV)의 분석방법에 따른 수소투과전류밀도 비교

  • 오소형 (순천대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 황병찬 (순천대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 이무석 (코오롱인더스트리(주) Eco연구소 중앙기술원) ;
  • 이동훈 (코오롱인더스트리(주) Eco연구소 중앙기술원) ;
  • 박권필 (순천대학교 화학공학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.03
  • Accepted : 2017.11.21
  • Published : 2018.04.01

Abstract

Degree of membrane degradation in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) is mainly evaluated by the hydrogen crossover current density. The hydrogen crossover current density is measured by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), which differs from the DOE protocol and the NEDO protocol. In this study, two protocols were compared during PEMFC operation and accelerated stress test. In the LSV method by the DOE method, the scan rate change affects the hydrogen crossover current density, but the NEDO method does not affect the hydrogen crossover current density. In the course of 15,000 cycles of polymer membrane wet/dry cycle, the DOE method was sensitive to membrane degradation, but the NEDO method was less sensitive to membrane degradation than the DOE method.

고분자전해질 연료전지(PEMFC)의 고분자막 열화정도는 주로 수소투과전류밀도로 평가한다. 수소투과전류밀도는 선형주사전압전류측정법(Linear Sweep Voltammetry, LSV)으로 측정하는데 DOE프로토콜과 NEDO프로토콜이 분석방법에 차이가 있다. 본 연구에서는 PEMFC 구동 및 가속 열화 시험 과정에서 두 프로토콜을 적용해 수소투과 전류밀도를 비교하였다. DOE 방법에 의한 LSV 방법에서는 주사속도(scan rate) 변화가 수소투과 전류밀도에 영향을 주지만 NEDO 방법에서는 주사속도가 수소투과전류밀도에 영향을 주지 않았다. 고분자막 가습/건조 15,000사이클 평가과정에서 DOE 방법은 막의 열화를 민감하게 측정하였으나 NEDO방법은 DOE방법에 비해 막의 열화가 덜 민감하게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Williams, M. C., Strakey, J. P. and Surdoval, W. A., "The U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy Stationary Fuel cell Program," J. Power Sources, 143(1-2), 191-196(2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.003
  2. Perry, M. L. and Fuller, T. F., "A Historical Perspective of Fuel Cell Technology in the 20th Century," J. ElectroChem. Soc., 149(7), S59-S67(2002). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1488651
  3. Wilkinson, D. P. and St-Pierre, J., in: W. Vielstich, H. A. Gasteiger, A. Lamm (Eds.). Handbook of Fuel Cell: Fundamentals Technology and Applications, Vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England, 611-612(2003).
  4. Wilson, M. S., Garzon, F. H., Sickafus, K. E. and Gottesfeld, S. "Surface Area Loss of Supported Platinum in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells," J. ElectroChem. Soc., 140, 2872-2877(1993). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2220925
  5. Knights, S. D., Colbow, K. M., St-Pierre, J. and Wilkinson, D. P., "Aging Mechanism and Lifetime of PEFC and DMFC," J. Power Sources, 127, 127-134(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.033
  6. Luo, Z., Li, D., Tang, H., Pan, M. and Ruan, R., "Degradation Behavior of Membrane-electrode-assembly Materials in 10-cell PEMFC Stack," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31, 1838-1854(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.006
  7. Pozio, A., Silva R. F., Francesco, M. D. and Giorgi, L., "Nafion Degradation in PEFCs from End Plate Iron Contamination," ElectroChim. Acta, 48, 1543-1548(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00026-4
  8. Xie, J., Wood III, D. L., Wayne, D. N., Zawodinski, T. A., Atanassov, P. and Borup, R. L., "Durability of PEFCs at High Humidity Conditions," J. ElectroChem. Soc., 152, A104-A113(2005). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1830355
  9. Curtin, D. E., Lousenberg, R. D., Henry, T. J., Tangeman, P. C. and Tisack, M. E., "Advanced Materials of Improved PEMFC Performance and Life," J. Power Sources, 131, 41-48(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.023
  10. Collier, A., Wang, H., Yaun, X., Zhang, J. and Wilison, D. P., "Degradation of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31, 1838-1854(2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.006
  11. Jeong, J. J., Jeong, J. H., Kim, S. H., Ahn, B. K., Ko, J. J. and Park, K. P., "Measurement of Hydrogen Crossover by Gas Chromatograph in PEMFC," Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 52(4), 425-429 (2014). https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2014.52.4.425
  12. Lee, H., Kim, T. H., Sim, W. J., Kim, S. H., Ahn, B. K., Lim, T. W. and Park, K. P., "Pinhole formation in PEMFC Membrane After ElectroChemical Degradation and Wet/dry Cycling Test," Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 487-491(2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0381-6
  13. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/fuelcells/pdfs/component_durability_profile.pdf, "DOE CELL COMPONENT ACCELERATED STRESS TEST PROToCOLS FOR PEM FUEL CELLS."
  14. Daido University, Ritsumeikian Univ., Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Automobile Research Ins., "Cell Evaluation and Analysis ProtoCol Guidline, " NEDO, Development of PEFC Technologies for Commercial Promotion-PEFC Evaluation Project, January 30 (2014).

Cited by

  1. A Highly Durable Quercetin-Based Proton Exchange Membrane for Fuel Cells vol.166, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0071907jes
  2. 고분자전해질 연료전지 고분자막의 특성 및 성능 비교 vol.58, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2020.58.2.171
  3. 국내 연료전지 분야 연구동향 분석: 전극, 전해질, 분리판, 스택, 시스템, BOP, 진단분석 분야 vol.31, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7316/khnes.2020.31.6.530