DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Korean University Library Holdings of Western Language Books Using a Union Catalog Database

종합목록DB를 이용한 국내 대학도서관 서양서 소장 실태 분석

  • 이지원 (대구가톨릭대학교 도서관학과) ;
  • 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.02.21
  • Accepted : 2018.03.08
  • Published : 2018.03.30

Abstract

This study analyzed Korean university libraries' holdings of Western language books published in 2003 and 2013 using the KERIS union catalog with a view to investigating the changes in collection development of Western language books in the libraries. To do that, new collection indexes - holding h-index, CUI (Collection Uniqueness Index), and CCHR (Common Collection Holding Ratio) - were suggested, and they were used with basic indexes such as the number of titles, the number of books, and the number of books per title. The analysis reveals that compared to those published in 2003, the number of titles was decreased by 16.1% with those published in 2013, and the number of books dropped more sharply, by 42.2%. Also, in 2013, CCHR was decreased while CUI was increased. In terms of subject, among DDC main classes, 0XX (Generalities) showed the greatest decrease rate in both the number of titles and books because of the radical reduction of computer-related books. In terms of each library's holdings, the number of Western language books held by top libraries has been increased with those published in 2013.

본 연구는 국내 대학도서관 서양서 장서 개발의 변화를 살펴보기 위해 2003년과 2013년에 출판된 서양서 소장 실태를 KERIS 종합목록을 통해 분석하였다. 이를 위해 새로운 장서 지표로 소장 h-지수, 장서 고유성 지수, 그리고 공통장서 확보율을 제안하고 기본 지표인 종수 및 책수, 그리고 종당 책수와 함께 활용하였다. 분석 결과 2003년에 비해서 2013년에 출판된 서양서의 전체 소장 종수는 16.1% 감소하고 소장 책수는 42.2% 감소하여 소장 책수가 더 크게 감소하였다. 여러 도서관이 공통적으로 소장하는 공통 장서, 또는 기본 장서의 규모를 나타내는 공통장서 확보율은 줄어들었고, 장서고유성은 증가하였다. DDC 주류 중에서는 컴퓨터 관련 도서가 급감한 0XX(총류) 분야의 감소율이 가장 컸다. 도서관별 장서량 측면에서는 2003년에 비해서 2013년 출판도서의 경우에 상위 도서관이 더욱 과점하는 빈익빈 부익부 현상이 심화되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김선애, 이수상 (2006). KOLIS-NET 종합목록 DB의 품질평가. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1), 95-117. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095 Kim, Sun-Ae, & Lee, Soo-Sang (2006). Quality evaluation of a shared cataloging DB: The case of KOLIS-NET. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(1), 95-117. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.1.095
  2. 오지은, 정동열 (2015). 공공도서관의 장서개발정책 수립을 위한 장서평가 지표에 관한 탐색적 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(1), 43-62. http://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.043 Oh, Ji-Eun, & Jeong, Dong Youl (2015). An exploratory study on collection evaluation indicators for the collection development policy in public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(1), 43-62. http://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.043
  3. 윤지은 (2014. 11. 10). 자료구입비 감소로 학술도서 비중도 줄고 있다. 교수신문. Retrieved from http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=29893 Yun, Ji-Eun (2014. 11. 10). The proportion of academic books is decreasing due to the decrease in the purchase cost of library collections. Kyosu Sinmun. Retrieved from http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=29893
  4. 이제환 (2002). 공동목록 DB의 품질평가와 품질관리: KERIS의 종합목록DB를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(1), 61-89. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.061 Lee, Jae Whoan (2002). Quality evaluation and management of a shared cataloging DB: the case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(1), 61-89. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.061
  5. 조순영 (2002). 종합목록 데이터의 오류 유형에 관한 연구 - KERIS 종합목록의 학위논문 서지데이터를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(4), 5-19. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.4.005 Cho, Sun Yeong (2002). A study on error data types in the KERIS union catalog-focused on disseration bibligraphic database. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(4), 5-19. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.4.005
  6. 조재인 (2015). 대학도서관의 종합목록 기여 활동 및 이용 정도에 대한 탐사적 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 26(1), 35-50. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.1.035 Cho, Jane (2015). Exploratory study on the activity about utilization and contribution to the union catalog. Journal of The Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(1), 35-50. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.1.035
  7. KERIS 종합목록 홈페이지 (2018). Retrieved from http://unicat.riss.kr KERIS Union Catalog homepage (2018). Retrieved from http://unicat.riss.kr
  8. Beals, J. B., & Gilmour, R. (2007). Assessing collections using brief tests and WorldCat Collection Analysis. Collection Building, 26(4), 104-107, https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950710831898
  9. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  10. Hubbard, D. E., & Neville, B. D. (2012). Benchmarking mechanical engineering collections using the WorldCat Collection Analysis tool. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 36(3/4), 56-68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2012.09.001
  11. Joy, A. H. (1992). The OCLC/AMIGOS collection analysis CD: A unique tool for collection evaluation and development. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 8(1), 23-45. http://doi.org/10.1300/J121v08n01_03
  12. Perrault, A. H. (1994). The shrinking national collection: A study of the effects of the diversion of funds from monographs to serials on the monograph collections of research libraries. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 18(1), 3-22. http://doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(94)90067-1
  13. Perrault, A. H. (1999). National collecting trends: Collection analysis methods and findings. Library & Information Science Research, 21(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80005-X
  14. Wilen, R., & Ahtola, A. (2006) Collection evaluation: Micro and macro levels - Preliminary guidelines and the results of a pilot study of two Finnish university libraries. Signum 3, 39-43. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/signum/article/ download/3390/3140/