DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Positional Changes of Arms and Legs to Electrocardiogram

  • Song, Joo-Eun (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University) ;
  • Song, Min-Ju (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Ye-Sul (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University) ;
  • Yang, Ha-Nuel (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University) ;
  • Lee, Ye-Jin (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University) ;
  • Jung, Dongju (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University)
  • Received : 2018.01.26
  • Accepted : 2018.03.06
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely used method to diagnose electrical activity of heart. Although it is a reliable and easy method, ECG could be interfered by electrical signals. One of the interfering signals is electromyogram (EMG) that is caused by muscle contraction in any parts of the body except heart. To avoid the EMG noise, an examinee is advised to be relaxed on supine position while measuring ECG. Sometimes, patients who can't put their arms and legs down on bed due to some reasons such as cast on arms or legs necessarily have the EMG noise. But detailed information about how much of the noise could be induced by positional change of arms and legs has not been reported. Here we examined the noise by analyzing ECG data from 14 candidates, 7 males and 7 females. The ECG data was obtained using the standard 12 lead ECG. EMG noise was induced by raising arms and legs at $90^{\circ}$, $60^{\circ}$ or $30^{\circ}$. Because arms are located close to the heart, noise by the raised arms was analyzed toward left or right arm separately. All of the examinees showed similar pattern of the EMG noise. EMG noise by positional change of left or right arm was clearly monitored in different limb leads. Change of leg positions induced the noise that was monitored in aVF of augmented leads and II and III of limb leads. There was a difference in degree of the noise between male and female examinees. In addition to the EMG noise, decrease of PR interval was monitored in particular positional changes, which was prominent in male examinees. These results will enlarge fundamental understanding about EMG noise in ECG.

Keywords

References

  1. Blanco-Velasco M, Weng B, Barner KE. ECG signal denoising and baseline wander correction based on the empirical mode decomposition. Comput Biol Med. 2008. 38: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.06.003
  2. Burch GE. History of precordial leads in electrocardiography. European Journal of Cardiology. 1978. 8: 207-236.
  3. Cherkassky V, Kilts S. Myopotential denoising of ECG signals using wavelet thresholding methods. Neural Networks. 2001. 14: 1129-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(01)00041-7
  4. Gabriel DA, Lester SM, Lenhardt SA, Cambridge ED. Analysis of surface EMG spike shape across different levels of isometric force. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2007. 159: 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.07.004
  5. Jin HS, Jung DJ. Gender-specific Association of the ANO1 Genetic Variations with Hypertension. Biomedical Science Letters. 2015. 21: 144-151. https://doi.org/10.15616/BSL.2015.21.3.144
  6. Lu G, Brittain JS, Holland P, Yianni J, Green AL, Stein JF, Aziz TZ, Wang S. Removing ECG noise from surface EMG signals using adaptive filtering. Neuroscience Letters. 2009. 462: 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.063
  7. Mithun P, Pandey PC, Sebastian T, Mishra P, Pandey VK. A wavelet based technique for suppression of EMG noise and motion artifact in ambulatory ECG. Conference Proceedings IEEE Engineering in Medicine Biology Society. 2011. 2011: 7087-7090.
  8. Pedley DK, Brett C, Nicho N. P-R segment depression: an early diagnostic feature in acute pericarditis: a telephone survey of UK accident and emergency departments. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002. 9: 43-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200203000-00010
  9. Planck EH. The electrocardiogram; history and clinical application. Journal of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama. 1945. 15: 181.
  10. Simonson E. The normal variability of the electrocardiogram as a basis for differentiation between normal and abnormal in clinical electrocardiography. American Heart Journal. 1958. 55: 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(58)90258-8