벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.177-189
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

벤처기업의 성장단계별 기업경쟁력 및 기업 성과 창출 전략

Enterprise Competitiveness and Corporate Performance Creation Strategies by Stage of Growth on Firm

  • 투고 : 2018.11.12
  • 심사 : 2018.12.25
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경영환경은 정보기술 및 시장의 니즈, 경쟁자 등의 출현으로 인해 계속 변화한다. 심화되는 경쟁 속에 기업들은 생존과 발전을 내세우고 기업 특성에 맞지 않는 무분별한 전략을 답습하면서 오히려 역효과를 내고 있는 경우도 있다. 특히 변화에 적응할 수 있는 기반이나 자원이 부족한 벤처기업 및 창업기업들의 경우 창업 후 생존율이 점차 낮아지면서 충분한 경쟁력을 갖추지 못한 상황도 벌어지고 있다. 이들 벤처기업과 창업기업들 역시 도태되지 않고 생존하기 위해 다양한 전략을 통해서 경쟁력을 갖추려 노력하고 있다. 벤처기업이 비즈니스 생태계 내에서 하나의 유기적 생명체로서 진화하는 과정을 제품이나 산업의 수명주기와 마찬가지로 창업기, 초기 성장기, 고도 성장기, 성숙기, 쇠퇴기 등의 정형화된 단계에 비추어 분석해볼 수 있다. 이 경우, 벤처기업이 무차별적으로 전략경영의 모델을 적용하는 것 보다 해당 기업이 놓인 수명주기 단계별로 전략, 조직 구조, 의사결정방식, 통제유형 등을 상이하게 판단하고 이에 적절한 전략을 수행하는 접근을 생각해볼 수 있다. 지식가치에 초점을 두어 보면, 동일 생산요소를 투입하더라도 이를 적용할 수 있는 지식이 있는 경우 더 높은 가치 창출이 가능하며, 기업의 수명주기 단계에 비추어 보면 차별화된 시사점을 얻을 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 '2017년 벤처기업정밀실태조사' 데이터를 기반으로 기업의 외부 협력 정도 및 벤처기업 지원제도 활용 정도가 경쟁력과 성과에 미치는 영향이 기업의 수명주기별로 상이함을 확인하였다. 분석 결과 도입기와 초기성장기, 고도성장기, 성숙기, 쇠퇴기별로 기업경쟁력에 영향을 미치는 영향이 상이하게 나타났으며, 경영성과 역시 영향을 미치는 요인들이 상이한 것으로 나타났다. 이는 무분별하게 경영전략의 모델들을 구사하기보다 기업수명주기 단계에 맞는 경쟁전략을 실시하는 접근이 필요하며, 성과를 창출하는 경쟁력을 구축하는 방식 역시 차별적이어야 함을 보여준다.

Business environment is always full of challenges. Despite various strategic efforts, there are so many failure cases of misfit. With the weaker resource base and institutional foundation, startup firms find it more difficult to find the right spot in the stiff competition. In the middle of evolutionary process, the startup firms need proper strategies meeting the differential challenges along the multiple stages of growth. Following the idea of product life cycle, this study applies the four stages of growth-startup, initial growth, accelerated growth, matured, and decliing. The next step for the startup manager is meeting each stage of growth with proper strategic efforts, including strategy, structure, decision-making pattern, and control method. When the knowledge factor is introduced, there is a potential for higher performance. Based on the 'Detailed Survey on Startup Ventures in 2017,' this study explores the impact of the government subsidy program on the firm competitiveness and performance-along the four stages of growth. In each stage, the strategy factors showed differential impact.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, E., & Narus, J.(1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 42-58.
  2. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., & Vickers, J.(2001). Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation, The Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), 467-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00177
  3. Aguilar, F. J.(1967). Scanning the Business Environment, Macmillan.
  4. Asiedu, E.(2002). On the Determinants of FDI to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different?, Word Development, 30(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00100-0
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko A.(2001). Effects of market and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on production innovation, Organizational Science, 12(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.54.10121
  6. Burgelman, R. A.(1996). A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 193-214.
  7. Cardullo, M. W.(1999). Technological entrepreneurism: enterprise formation, financing and growth, Research Studies Press.
  8. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J.(2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press on Demand.
  9. Dickinson, V.(2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle, The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969-1994. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10130
  10. Edler, J., & Georghiou, L.(2007). Public procurement and innovation-Resurrecting the demand side, Research policy, 36(7), 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
  11. Galende, J.(2006). Analysis of technological innovation from business economics and management, Technovation, 26(3), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.006
  12. Ghemawat, P.(1991). Commitment, Simon and Schuster.
  13. Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D.(2008). Venture capital investment cycles: The impact of public markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.12.002
  14. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B.(2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290004555
  15. Howitt, P., & Aghion, P.(1998). Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 3(2), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009769717601
  16. Jambulingam, T., Kathuria, R., & Doucette, W. R.(2005). Entrepreneurial orientation as a basis for classification within a service industry: the case of retail pharmacy industry, Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.003
  17. Kazanjian, R. K., & Drazin, R.(1989). An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model, Management Science, 35(12), 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1489
  18. Kim, D. J., & Park, D. I.(2016). The Impact of Corporate Strategies and Government Support Policies on the Corporate Performance: Focusing on Certification of Innovation, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entreprenruship, 11(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.1.201602.13
  19. Kim, Y. B., & Ha, S. Y.(2000). Types of Korean Ventures: An Empirical Analysis on Ventures Designated by Korean Government, Journal of Strategic Management, 3(1), 25-60.
  20. Kirca, A. H., S. Jayachandran., & Bearden, W. O.(2005). Market orientation: A metaanalytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance, Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761
  21. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A.(1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000406
  22. Laursen, K., & Salter, A.(2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?, Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  23. Lee, D. K.(2014). This week 's debate: Current status and improvement of Korean entrepreneurial ecosystem, Weekly Financial Brief, 23, 3-9.
  24. Lee, B. H., Lee, S. W., & Wi, S. A.(2014). The Effect of Government R&D Support on SMEs' Technological Innovation Performance in Korea, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(5), 157-171.
  25. Love, J. H., & Roper, S.(1999). The determinants of innovation: R & D, technology transfer and networking effects, Review of Industrial Organization, 15(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963
  26. Mata, J., & Portugal, P.(1994). Life duration of new firms, Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(3), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950567
  27. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H.(1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle, Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  28. March, J. G.(1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  29. Miller, D., De Vries, M. F. K., & Toulouse, J. M.(1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment, Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/255988
  30. Murray, A. I.(1988). A contingency view of Porter's generic strategies, Academy of management review, 13(3), 390-400. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1988.4306951
  31. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P.(1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests, Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140205
  32. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G.(1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited, The American Economic Review, 72(1), 114-132.
  33. Penrose, E. T.(1960). The growth of the firm-a case study: the Hercules Powder Company, Business History Review, 34(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3111776
  34. Pellenbarg, P. H., & Van Steen, P. J.(2003). Spatial perspectives on firm dynamics in the Netherlands, Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(5), 620-630.
  35. Porter, M. E.(1990). Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Press.
  36. Porter, M. E.(1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, New York: Free Press 43, 214.
  37. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G.(1999). The core competence of the corporation, In Knowledge and Strategy, HBR. 41-59.
  38. Schiffer, M., & Weder, B.(2001). Firm Size and the Business Environment: Worldwide Survey Results, World Bank, IFC Discussion Paper. 43.
  39. Roger, H.(1998). The Dynamics of Industrial Location: The Factory, the Firm and the Production System, John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Sandberg, W. R., & Hofer, C. W.(1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90016-4
  41. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V.(1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches, Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976
  42. Weerawardena, J.(2003). Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy, European Journal of Marketing. 37(3/4), 407-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310459023