Journal of Plant Biotechnology

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current status of new plant breeding technology and its efforts toward social acceptance

신식물육종기술의 현황과 사회적 수용을 위한 노력

  • Jung, Yu Jin (Department of Horticultural Life Science, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong Mi (Korea Public Management Institute) ;
  • Park, Soo-Chul (Crop Biotechnology Institute, Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Gu (Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Kwon Kyoo (Department of Horticultural Life Science, Hankyong National University)
  • 정유진 (국립한경대학교 원예생명과학과) ;
  • 김종미 (한국공공관리연구원) ;
  • 박수철 (서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) ;
  • 조용구 (충북대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 강권규 (국립한경대학교 원예생명과학과)
  • Received : 2018.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.12.14
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Although new plant breeding technologies facilitate efficient plant breeding without introducing a transgene, they are creating indistinct boundaries in the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The rapid advancement in plant breeding by genome-editing requires the establishment of a new global policy for the new biotechnology, while filling the gap between process-based and product-based GMO in terms of regulations. In this study recent developments in producing major crops using new plant breeding technologies were reviewed, and a regulatory model that takes into account the various methodologies to achieve genetic modifications as well as the resulting types of mutation were proposed. Moreover, the communication process were discussed in order to understand consumers' current situation and problems of new plant breeding technology, establish social acceptance well, and understand consumers' disputes such as GMO crops.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, oshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2012) Genome sequencing reveals gronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol 30:174-178 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2095
  2. ACRE (2002) The criteria used by ACRE to gauge harm when giving advice on the risks of releasing genetically modified organisms to the environment. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/harm/pdf/acre_harm_report.pdf
  3. Araki M and Ishii T (2015) Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. TRPLSC:1257
  4. Baker GA and Mazzocco MA (2002) Consumer response to GMO foods: branding, certification, and consumer characteristics, AAEA-WAEA Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California, July 28-31
  5. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Patron NJ, Nekrasov V (2015) Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr Opin Biotech 32:76-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007
  6. Cellini F, Chesson A, Colquhoun I, Constable A, Davies HV, Engel KH, Gatehouse AMR, Karenlampi S, Kok EJ, Leguay JJ, Lehesranta S, Noteborn HPJM, Pedersen J, Smith M (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1089-1125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.003
  7. Durai S, Mani M, Kandavelou K, Wu J, Porteus MH, Chandrasegaran S (2005) Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5978-5990
  8. Fan J, Jia H (2013) The GM corn carcinogenic study and the proper reasoning on controversial research. Chinese Bulletin of Life Science 25:552-559
  9. Holme IB, Wendt T, Holm PB (2013) Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotechnol J 11:395-407 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12055
  10. Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e188 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt780
  11. Joung JK and Sander JD (2013) TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 49-55
  12. Jung YJ, Bae SS, Lee GJ, Seo PJ, Cho YG, Kang KK (2017) A novel method for high-frequency genome editing in rice, using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J plant Biotechnol 44:89-96 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2017.44.1.089
  13. Kempe K, Gils M (2011) Pollination control technologies for hybrid breeding. MOL BREEDING 27:417-437 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9555-0
  14. Kim DS, Lee IS, Jang CS, Kang SY, Seo YW (2005) Characterization of the altered anthranilate synthase in 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice mutants. Plant Cell Rep 24:357-365 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0943-y
  15. Lee HY, Kameya T (1991) Selection and characterization of a rice mutant resistant to 5-methyltryptophan. THEOR APPL GENET 82:405-408 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588590
  16. Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B (2012) High efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. NAT BIOTECHNOL 30:390-392 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2199
  17. Moore T, Haig D (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. TRENDS GENET 7:45-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(91)90040-W
  18. Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, Nogue F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. TRENDS BIOTECHNOL 31:375-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.004
  19. Quetier F (2016) The CRISPR-Cas9 technology: Closer to the ultimate toolkit for targeted genome editing. Plant SCI 242:65-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.003
  20. Rose NR, Klose RJ (2014) Understanding the relationship between DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation. BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA 1839:1362-1372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.007
  21. Saze H, Tsugane K, Kanno T, Nishimura T (2012) DNA methylation in plants: relationship to small RNAs and histone modifications, and functions in transposon inactivation. PLANT CELL PHYSIOL 53:766-784 https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs008
  22. Shan Q, Zhang Y, Chen K, Zhang K, Gao C (2015) Creation of fragrant rice by targeted knockout of the OsBADH2 gene using TALEN technology. PLANT BIOTECHNOL J 13: 791-800 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12312
  23. Shukla VK, Doyon, Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Worden SE, Mitchell JC, Arnold NL, Gopalan S, Meng X, Choi VM, Rock JM, Wu YY, Katibah GE, Zhifang G, McCaskill D, Simpson MA, Blakeslee B, Greenwalt SA, Butler HJ, Hinkley SJ, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. NATURE 459:437-441 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07992
  24. Takagi H, Tamiru M, Abe A, Yoshida K, Uemura A, Yaegashi H, Obara T, Oikawa K, Utsushi H, Kanzaki E, Mitsuoka C, Natsume S, Kosugi S, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Urasaki N, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2015) MutMap accelerates breeding of a salt-tolerant rice cultivar. NAT BIOTECHNOL 33:445-449 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3188
  25. Van der Hoorn RA, Laurent F, Roth R, De Wit PJ (2000) Agroinfiltration is a versatile tool that facilitates comparative analyses of Avr9/Cf-9-Induced and Avr4/Cf-4-induced necrosis. MOL PLANT MICROBE INTERACTIONS 13:439-46 https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.4.439
  26. Voytas DF and Gao C (2014) Precision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001877 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001877
  27. Wakasa K, Widholm JM (1987) A 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice mutant, MTR1, selected in tissue-culture. THEOR APPL GENET 74:49-54 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290082
  28. Wu X, Johansen JV, Helin K (2013) Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. MOL CELL 49:1134-1146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.016
  29. Yan J, Shah T, Warburton ML, Buckler ES, McMullen MD, Crouch J (2009) Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLOS ONE 4:e8451 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008451
  30. Zhou X, Jacobs TB, Xue LJ, Harding SC, Tsai CJ (2015) Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the out crossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. NEW PHYTOL 208:298-301 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13470