DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship Between Noise-Related Risk Perception, Knowledge, and the Use of Hearing Protection Devices Among Para Rubber Wood Sawmill Workers

  • Thepaksorn, Phayong (Trang Research Center for Occupational Health, Sirindhorn College of Public Health) ;
  • Siriwong, Wattasit (College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University) ;
  • Neitzel, Richard L. (School of Public Health, University of Michigan) ;
  • Somrongthong, Ratana (College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University) ;
  • Techasrivichien, Teeranee (School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University)
  • Received : 2016.11.11
  • Accepted : 2017.06.07
  • Published : 2018.03.30

Abstract

Background: The understanding of the relationship between risk perception, knowledge, and protective behaviors could play a major role in occupational risk control and management. Research exploring how workers perceive, recognize, and react to risks in different occupational settings is scarce in Thailand. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of noise-related risk perceptions and knowledge to the use of hearing protective devices (HPDs) among sawmill workers in Thailand. Methods: Sawmill workers (n = 540) from four factories in Trang, Southern Thailand, participated in a questionnaire interview from December 2015 to January 2016. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to explore the risk factors related to HPD use. Path diagram analysis was demonstrated and used to evaluate associations. Results: Risk perception was significantly correlated with HPD use (p < 0.01), HPD training (p = 0.01), and the number of years of work experience (p = 0.03). Sawmill workers were likely to use HPDs based on their risk perception and HPD training. However, HPD training was inversely correlated with age and the number of years of work experience. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of risk perceptions and knowledge, and these factors should be emphasized in the design and implementation of any personal safety intervention program for sawmill workers.

Keywords

References

  1. Thepaksorn P, Pongpanich S. Occupational injuries and illnesses and associated costs in Thailand. J Saf Health Work 2014;5:66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.04.001
  2. Thepaksorn P, Keifer M, Daniell W, Padungtod C. Occupational accidents and injuries in Thailand. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007;13:290-4. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.290
  3. Siripanich S, Meanpoung P, Sangchatip A. Trends and characteristics of occupational injuries in Thailand, 2002-2010. OSIR 2014;7:8-15.
  4. Ford MT, Tetrick LE. Relations among occupational hazards, attitudes, and safety performance. J Occup Health Psychol 2011;16:48-66.
  5. Garcia AM, Boix P, Canosa C. Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:239-46.
  6. Leiter MP, Zanaletti W, Argentero P. Occupational risk perception, safety training, and injury prevention: testing a model in the Italian printing industry. J Occup Health Psychol 2009;14:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.14.1.1
  7. Inouye J. Risk perception: theories, strategies, and next steps. The Campbell Institute. National Safety Council; 2014.
  8. Oppong S. Risk chain process model: linking risk perception to occupational health. Siggurnost 2015;57:25-34.
  9. De Giusti M, Corrao CR, Mannocci A, Palazzo C, Riccardi R, Schmidt SL, Sernia S, La Torre G. Occupational biological risk knowledge and perception: results from a large survey in Rome, Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2012;48:138-45. https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_12_02_06
  10. Cezar-Vaz MR, Rocha LP, Bonow CA, Santos da Silva MR, Cezar Vaz J, Cardoso LS. Risk perception and occupational accidents: a study of gas station workers in Southern Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012;9:2362-77. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9072362
  11. McCool JP, Reeder AI, Robinson EM, Peterie KJ, Gorman DF. Outdoor workers' perceptions of the risks of excess sun-exposure. J OccupHealth 2009;51:404-11.
  12. Jahangiri M, Mirzaei R, Aansari H. Risk perception, knowledge and safety attitude and hearing protector use in petrochemical industry's workers. Audiology 2008;17:11-8.
  13. Pidgeon N. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science program: why we do need risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1998;59:5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
  14. Risk perception and risk communication with regard to nanomaterials in the workplace. European Risk Observatory Literature Review. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
  15. Risk & risk perception: a literature review. Canberra (Australia): Australian National University; 2004. Report No.04/043.
  16. Olta C, Sala R. A review of the social research on public perception and engagement practices in urban air pollution. Madrid (Spain): Ministerio De Economia Y Competitividad; 2014.
  17. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety [Internet]. [cited 2015 June 20]. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/jobhaz.html.
  18. Thepaksorn P, Jaijong S, Tohtuptiang K, Rakthong C. Occupational accidents and injuries of insured workers in Trang Province, Thailand. In: The 29th Annual Conference of Asia Pacific Occupation Safety & Health Organization, Bangkok. July 2-6, 2014.
  19. Thepaksorn P, Thongjerm S, Incharoen S, Siriwong W, Harada K, Koizumi A. Job safety analysis and hazard identification for work accident prevention in Rubber wood sawmills in Trang Province, Thailand. J Occup Health 2017 [in press].
  20. Thepaksorn P, Fadrilan-Camacho V, Siriwong W. Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory function defects among Para rubber wood sawmill workers in the South of Thailand. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1285221 [in press].
  21. Research and Human Resource Development Department. Ministry of Labor (MOL) [Internet]. [cited 2015 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.mol.go.th/employee/Welfare_workers. [In Thai].
  22. Arezes PM, Miguel AS. Hearing protection use in industry: the role of risk perception. Safe Sci 2005;43:253-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.07.002
  23. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a metaanalysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:1103-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172

Cited by

  1. Actual Air Pollution, Environmental Transparency, and the Perception of Air Pollution in China vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496518821713
  2. A comparison of owner/operator and worker perspectives on workplace safety in the West Virginia logging industry vol.64, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23228
  3. Examining Organizational, Cultural, and Individual-Level Factors Related to Workplace Safety and Health: A Systematic Review and Metric Analysis vol.36, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1731913
  4. Occupational noise-related perception and personal protection behavior among Chinese construction workers vol.147, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105629