DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of MMP-2 activation and FSH or LH Hormone Supplementation on Embryo Development in In Vitro Fertilization of Porcine

  • Kim, Sang Hwan (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Yoon, Jong Taek (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2018.12.18
  • Accepted : 2018.12.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether FSH and LH hormone treatment directly or indirectly affect embryo development in embryonic development. To determine this, we compared the development of embryonic cells through the expression pattern of MMPs. As a result, 33.8% of blastocysts were formed in FSH added group, 20.8% in LH added group and 10% in FSH + LH added group. In addition, the activity of MMP-9 was highly detected in the FSH-added group, and the expression of Casp-3 was much lower than that of the other groups. These results suggest that the addition of FSH seems to increase the activity of MMP-9 in embryonic cells, and that LH, on the contrary, may activate MMP-2 activity. In addition, the expression level of MMP-2 in the FSH-added group was high in the Trophoblast cell group and in the LH-added group, the hormone ideal secretion might affect the development of the embryonic cell.

Keywords

References

  1. Abeydeera LR. In vitro fertilization and embryo development in pigs. Reprod Suppl 2001; 58: 159-173.
  2. Anderiesz A, Ferraretti AP, Magli C, Fiorentino A, Fortini D, Gianaroli L. 2000. Effect of recombinant human gonadotrophins on human, bovine and murine oocyte meiosis, fertilization and embryonic development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 15:1140-1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.5.1140
  3. Bao B, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Salfen BE, Youngquist RS. 1997. Changes in messenger ribonucleic acid encoding luteinizing hormone receptor, cytochrome p450-side chain cleavage, and aromatase are associated with recruitment and selection of bovine ovarian follicles. Biol Reprod. 56:1158-1168. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1158
  4. Boland NI, Humpherson PG, Leese H, Gosden RG. 1993. Pattern of lactate production and steroidogenesis during growth and maturation of mouse ovarian follicles in vitro. Biol Reprod. 48:798-806. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.4.798
  5. Brackett BG, Zuelke KA. 1993. Analysis of factors involved in the in vitro production of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 39:43-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90023-X
  6. Cain LS, Chatterjee A, Collins TJ. 1995. In vitro folliculogenesis of rat preantral follicles. Endocrinology. 136:3369 3377.
  7. Cortvrindt R, Hu Y, Smitz J. 1998. Recombinant luteinizing hormone as a survival and differentiation factor increases oocyte maturation in recombinant follicle stimulating hormonesupplemented mouse preantral follicle culture. Hum Reprod. 13:1292-1302. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.5.1292
  8. Dominko T and First NL. 1992. Kinetics of bovine oocyte maturation allows selection for developmental competence and is affected by gonadotropins. Theriogenology. 37:203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90272-S
  9. Hsueh AJ, Adashi EY, Jones PB, Welsh TH. 1984. Hormonal regulation of the differentiation of cultured ovarian granulose cells. Endocr Rev. 5:76 127.
  10. Imai K, Khandoker MA, Yonai M, Takahashi T, Sato T, Ito A, 2003. Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 activities in bovine follicular fluid of different-sized follicles: relationship to intra-follocular inhibin and steroid concentrations. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 24: 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00235-7
  11. Keefer CL, Stice SL, and Dobrinsky J. 1993. Effect of Follicle- Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone During Bovine In Vitro Maturation on Development Following In Vitro Fertilization and Nuclear Transfer. MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT 36:469-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080360410
  12. Khandoker MA, Imai K, Takahashi T and Hashizume K. 2001. Role of gelatinase on follicular atresia in the bovine ovary. Biol Reprod 65: 726-732. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.3.726
  13. Kikuchi K, Kashiwazaki N, Nagai T, Nakai M, Somfai T, Noguchi J, Kaneko H. 2008. Selected aspects of advanced porcine reproductive technology. Reprod Domest 43(2): 401-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01191.x
  14. Li R, Phillips DM, Mather JP. 1995. Activin promotes ovarian follicle development in vitro. Endocrinology. 136:849-856. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.136.3.7867593
  15. McGee EA, Spears N, Minami S, Hsu S, Chun SY, Billig H. 1997. Preantral ovarian follicles in serum-free culture: suppression of apoptosis following activation of the cGMP pathway and stimulation of growth and differentiation by FSH. Endocrinology. 138:2417-2424. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.138.6.5164
  16. Moor RM, Osborn JC, Crosby IM. 1985. Gonadotrophin-induced abnormalities in sheep oocytes after superovulation. J Reprod Fertil. 74:167-172. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0740167
  17. Nemori R and Tachikawa T. 1999. A review for in situ zymographymethod for localization of protease activities in a tissue. Tissue Cult Eng 25: 361-364.
  18. Roy SK, Greenwald GS. 1989. Hormonal requirements for the growth and differentiation of hamster preantral follicles in long-term culture. J Reprod Fertil. 87:103-114. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0870103
  19. Suss U, Wuthrich K, and Stranzinger G. 1988. Chromosome configurations and time sequence of the first meiotic division in bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod 38:871-880. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod38.4.871
  20. Wen-Jui Yang, Fon-Chang Liu, Jih-Sheng Hsieh, Ching-Hung Chen, Shun-Yu Hsiao and Chih Sheng Lin. 2015. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 level in human follicular fluid is a reliable marker of human oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 13(102) doi: [10.1186/s12958-015-0099-8].
  21. Yoshioka K, Noguchi M, Suzuki C. 2012. Production of piglets from in vitro-produced embryos following non-surgical transfer. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 131: 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.018