Journal of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회지)

The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of OVOIL oil on B6D2F1 Mice Oogenesis

  • Lee, Dan-Bi (Department of Animal Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Kee Sang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Byoung Boo (Department of Animal Resources, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2018.11.27
  • Accepted : 2018.12.14
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the effect of types of oil (OVOIL vs. OIL) on B6D2F1 mice oogenesis. In this study, B6D2F1 F1 mice were used in order to maximize oogenesis. The expansion rate of cumulus cells ($82.0%{\pm}0.2$ vs. $78.0%{\pm}0.1$), in vitro fertilization rate ($92.0%{\pm}0.1$ vs. $88.0%{\pm}0.1$), developmental rate ($91.0%{\pm}0.1$ vs. $87.0%{\pm}0.2$), blastocysts formation rate ($56.0%{\pm}0.1$ vs. $57.0%{\pm}0.1$), and zona hatched rate($41.4%{\pm}0.2$ vs. $24.0%{\pm}0.1$) were not different between groups (NS; P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in maturation rate; the OVOIL group showed higher maturation rate compared to that of the OIL group ($96.0%{\pm}0.1$ vs. $87.0%{\pm}0.1$; P<0.05). In the blastocysts cell numbers, the total cell numbers ($83.9{\pm}26.1$ vs. $56.9{\pm}23.9$), ICM cell numbers ($15.7{\pm}8.8$ vs. $6.3{\pm}3.5$), TE cell numbers ($68.3{\pm}25.7$ vs. $50.7{\pm}24.1$), % ICM ($21.6%{\pm}0.1$ vs. $12.7%{\pm}0.1$), and the ratio of ICM:TE ($1:6.2{\pm}6.5$ vs. $1:10.3{\pm}7.0$) were significantly higher in the OVOIL group than the OIL group (P<0.05). These results suggested that it is expected to achieve the more developmental ability of B6D2F1 mice depending on the type of oil (OVOIL vs. OIL). In addition, the results can provide essential information for culture condition on B6D2F1 mice. Henceforth, thus, it is expected that these results herein might be used for in vitro culture of human embryos.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashworth CJ, Toma LM and Hunter MG. 2009. Nutritional effects on oocyte and embryo development in mammals: implications for reproductive efficiency and environmental sustainability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Bio. Sci. 364: 3351-3361 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0184
  2. Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Van Montfoort AP, Nelissen, EC, Coonen, E, Derhaag JG, Schreurs IL, Dunselman GA, Kester AD, Geraedts JP and Evers JL. 2010. Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns. Hum. Reprod. 25(3): 605-612. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep456
  3. Erbach GT, Bhatnagar P, Baltz JM and Biggers JD. 1995. Zinc is a possible toxic contaminant of silicone oil in microdrop cultures of preimplantation mouse embryos. Hum. Repro. 10: 3248-3254. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135897
  4. Lee DB, Park KS and Seo BB. 2016. Effect of Transfer Temperature of Epididymis on Survival Rate of Semen and B6D2F1 Mice Developmental Capacity. J. Emb. Trans. 31(4): 323-330. https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2016.31.4.323
  5. Lee S, Cho M, Kim E, Kim T, Lee C, Han J and Lim J. 2004. Renovation of a drop embryo cultures system by using refined mineral oil and the effect of glucose and/or hemoglobin added to a serum-free medium. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66: 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.66.63
  6. Lonergan P, Fair T, Corcoran D and Evans ACO. 2006. Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos. Theriogenology 65: 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.028
  7. Park SB, Kim HJ, Choi YB, Ahn KH, Lee KH, Yang JB, Yu CS and Seo BB. 2014. The effect of various assisted hatching techniques on the mouse early embryo development. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 41(2): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.2.68
  8. Reinsberg J, Ackermann D and van der Ven H. 2004. Pitfalls in assessment of progesterone production by granulosa cells cultured in contact with silicone rubber or paraffin oil. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 270: 174-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-003-0539-0
  9. Sifer C, Pont JC, Porcher R, Martin-Pont B, Benzacken B and Wolf JP. 2009. A prospective randomized study to compare four different mineral oils used to culture human embryos in IVF/ICSI treatments. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 147: 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.06.023
  10. Tae JC, Kim EY, Lee WD, Park SP and Lim JH. 2006. Sterile filtered paraffin oil supports in vitro developmental competence in bovine embryos comparable to co-culture. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 23: 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9024-6
  11. Van Soom A, Mahmoudzadeh AR, Christophe A, Ysebaert MT and de Kruif A. 2001. Silicone oil used in microdrop culture can affect bovine embryonic development and freezability. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 36: 1169-1176.
  12. Yoon J, Yoon S, Ko Y and Lim J. 2006. Effect of filtration of mineral oil on the mouse embryonic development in vitro. Fertil. Steril. 86(Suppl 2): S232.
  13. You YA, Mohamed EA, Oh SA, Pang MG. 2009. Optimized methods to maintain motility and viability in normozoospermic males. Kor. J. Reprod. Med. 36(1):45-53.
  14. Xu KP, Hoier R and Greve T. 1988. Dynamic changes of estradiol and progesterone concentrations during in vitro oocyte maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 30: 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(88)90174-4
  15. Zhang X and Armstrong DT 1989. Effects of follicle-stimulating hormone and ovarian steroids during in vitro meiotic maturation on fertilization of rat oocytes. Gamete. Res. 23:267-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120230304