DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Simulation of Interaction between Composite Breakwater and Seabed under Regular Wave Action by olaFlow Model

olaFlow 모델에 의한 규칙파작용 하 혼성방파제-해저지반의 상호작용에 관한 수치시뮬레이션

  • Bae, Ju-Hyun (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Graduate School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Ho (Dept. of Energy and Plant Eng., Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Jung, Uk Jin (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Graduate School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Kim, Do-Sam (Dept. of Civil Eng., Korea Maritime and Ocean Univ.)
  • 배주현 (한국해양대학교 대학원 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 이광호 (가톨릭관동대학교 에너지플랜트공학과) ;
  • 정욱진 (한국해양대학교 대학원 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김도삼 (한국해양대학교 건설공학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.28
  • Accepted : 2018.12.21
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The behavior of wave-induced pore water pressure inside the rubble mound and seabed, and the resultant structure failure are investigated, which are used in design of the composite breakwater representing the coastal and harbor structures. Numerical simulation techniques have been widely used to assess these behaviors through linear and nonlinear methods in many researches. While the combination of strongly nonlinear analytical method and turbulence model have not been applied yet, which can simulate these characteristics more accurately. In this study, olaFlow model considering the wave-breaking and turbulent phenomena is applied through VOF and LES methods, which gives more exact solution by using the multiphase flow analytical method. The verification of olaFlow model is demonstrated by comparing the experimental and numerical results for the interactions of regular waves-seabed and regular waves-composite breakwater-seabed. The characteristics of the spatial distributions of horizontal wave pressure, excess-pore-water pressure, mean flow velocity and mean vorticity on the upright caisson, and inside the rubble mound and seabed are discussed, as well as the relation between the mean distribution of vorticity size and mean turbulent kinetic energy. And the stability of composite breakwater are also discussed.

해안 항만구조물을 대표하는 혼성방파제의 설계에서 파랑하중에 의한 사석마운드 및 해저지반의 내부에서 과잉간극수압의 거동과 그에 따른 구조물의 파괴가 논의되어 왔고, 이를 수치시뮬레이션기법으로 규명하려는 시도가 있어왔다. 수치시뮬레이션에 관한 대부분의 연구에서는 선형 및 비선형의 해석법이 적용되었지만, 난류모델를 고려한 강비선형해석법이 적용된 사례는 거의 없었다. 본 연구에서는 VOF 법에 의한 쇄파현상과 LES 법에 의한 난류모델을 고려하는 고정도의 혼상류해석법인 olaFlow 모델을 적용하였으며, 규칙파-해저지반 및 규칙파-혼성방파제-해저지반의 상호작용해석에 관한 기존의 수치해석해 및 실험치와의 비교로부터 olaFlow 모델의 타당성을 입증하였다. 이로부터 혼성방파제의 케이슨과 사석마운드에서뿐만 아니라 해저지반의 내부에서 규칙파랑하중에 의한 수평파압, 과잉간극수압의 공간분포, 평균유속, 평균와도의 공간분포에 관한 특성 및 와도 크기의 평균분포와 평균난류 운동에너지와의 관계를 검토하였으며, 나아가 혼성방파제의 안정성을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Biot, M.A. (1941). General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics, 12(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886
  2. Burcharth, H.F. and Christensen, C. (1991). On stationary and non-stationary porous flow in coarse granular materials. European Community, MAST G6-S: Project 1, Wave Action on and in Coastal Structures.
  3. Chang, Y.S. and Park, Y.G. (2016). Suspension of sediment particles over a ripple due to turbulent convection under unsteady flow conditions. Ocean Science Journal, 51(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-016-0011-2
  4. Chang, Y.S. and Scotti, A. (2006). Turbulent convection of suspended sediments due to flow reversal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111(C7).
  5. Goda, Y. (2010). Random seas and design of maritime structures, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
  6. Higuera, P., Lara, J.L. and Losada, I.J. (2014). Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using Open-FOAM(R). Part II: Application. Coastal Engineering, 83, 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.09.002
  7. Higuera, P., Liu, P.F., Lin, C., Wong, W.Y. and Kao, M.J. (2018). Laboratory-scale swash flows generated by a non-breaking solitary wave on a steep slope. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 847, 186-227. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.321
  8. Hsu, J.R.C. and Jeng, D.S. (1994). Wave-induced soil response in an unsaturated anisotropic seabed of finite thickness. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 18(11), 785-807. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610181104
  9. Hsu, T.J., Sakakiyama, T. and Liu, P.L.F. (2002). A numerical model for wave motions and turbulence flows in front of a composite breakwater. Coastal Engineering, 46(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(02)00045-5
  10. Jeng, D.S., Cha, D.H., Lin, Y.S. and Hu, P.S. (2001). Wave-induced pore pressure around a composite breakwater. Ocean Engineering, 28(10), 1413-1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(00)00059-7
  11. Jeng, D.S., Ye, J.H., Zhang, J.S. and Liu, P.F. (2013). An integrated model for the wave-induced seabed response around marine structures: Model verifications and applications. Coastal Engineering, 72, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.08.006
  12. Jensen, B., Jacobsen, N.G. and Christensen, E.D. (2014). Investigations on the porous media equations and resistance coefficients for coastal structures. Coastal Engineering, 84, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.11.004
  13. Kim, C.H. (2007). Nonlinear dynamic responses of soil on seabed and wave field around coastal?ocean structures under the wave action. Doctoral Thesis, Korea Maritime and Ocean University (in Korean).
  14. Kim, D.S., Hong, S.H., Kim, J.S. and Jeong, Y.T. (2000). Linear wave pressure distributions and loads acting on the vertical caisson of composite breakwater, and resulting wave reflection and transmission coefficients. Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 20(5B), 747-754.
  15. Kissling, K., Springer, J., Jasak, H., Schutz, S., Urban, K. and Piesche, M. (2010). A coupled pressure based solution algorithm based on the volume-of-fluid approach for two or more immiscible fluids. European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD.
  16. Lee, K.H., Bae, J.H., An, S.W., Kim, D.S. and Bae, K.S. (2016). Numerical analysis on wave characteristics around submerged breakwater in wave and current coexisting field by OLAFOAM. Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 28(6), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.9765/KSCOE.2016.28.6.332
  17. Maeno, S. and Nage, H. (1988). Settlement of a concrete block into a sand bed under wave pressure variation. Modeling Soil-Water-Structure Interactions, 67-76.
  18. Mase, H., Sakai, T. and Sakamoto, M. (1994). Wave-induced porewater pressures and effective stresses around breakwater. Ocean Engineering, 21(4), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(94)90010-8
  19. McDougal, W.G., Tsai, Y.T. and Sollitt, C.K. (1986). Verification of the analytical model for ocean wave-soil-caisson interaction. Proc. 20th Coastal Engineering, ASCE, 2089-2103.
  20. Moshagen, N.H. and Torum, A. (1975). Wave induced pressure in permeable seabeds. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 101, ASCE, 49-58.
  21. Mostafa, A.M., Mizutani, N. and Iwata, K. (1999). Nonlinear wave, composite breakwater, and seabed dynamic interaction. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 125(2), ASCE, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1999)125:2(88)
  22. Mynett, A.E. and Mei, C.C. (1982). Wave-induced stresses in a saturated poro-elastic sea bed beneath a rectangular caisson. Geotechnique, 32(3), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1982.32.3.235
  23. Okusa, S. (1985). Wave-induced stresses in unsaturated submarine sediments. Geotechnique, 35(4), 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.517
  24. Putnam, J.A. (1949). Loss of wave energy due to percolation in a permeable sea bottom. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 30(3), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR030i003p00349
  25. Sassa, S., Takahashi, H., Morikawa, Y. and Takano, D. (2016). Effect of overflow and seepage coupling on tsunami-induced instability of caisson breakwaters. Coastal Engineering, 117, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.08.004
  26. Sleath, J.F. (1970). Wave-induced pressures in beds of sand. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 96(2), ASCE, 367-378.
  27. Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 91(3), 99-164. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
  28. Sumer, B.M. (2014). Liquefaction around marine structures. World Scientific, New Jersey.
  29. Ulker, M.B.C., Rahman, M.S. and Jeng, D.S. (2009). Waveinduced response of seabed: various formulations and their applicability. Applied Ocean Research, 31(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2009.03.003
  30. Verruijt, A. (1969). Elastic storage of aquifers. Flow through Porous Media, 331-376.
  31. Yamamoto, T., Koning, H.L., Sellmeijer, H. and Van Hijum, E.P. (1978). On the response of a poro-elastic bed to water waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 87(1), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078003006
  32. Zen, K., Yamaguchi, H. and Watanabe, A. (1987). Wave induced liquefaction and densification on seabed. Rep. Port and Harbour Res. Inst., Nagase, Yokosuka, Japan, 26, 125-180.
  33. Zhang, J., Li, Q., Ding, C., Zheng, J. and Zhang, T. (2016). Experimental investigation of wave-driven pore-water pressure and wave attenuation in a sandy seabed. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8(6), 1-10.