Journal of Digital Contents Society (디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지)

Digital Contents Society (한국디지털콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on factors Affecting Performance Assessment of Small and Medium Business R&D Project

중소기업 기술개발사업 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2018.03.05
  • Accepted : 2018.03.25
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, the government has been interested in the creative economy in order to create new added value through industries and cultures, jobs, and growth engines for talented people who have creative ideas. The government emphasized technology commercialization as a core task for the realization of the creative economy in the '5th Technology Transfer and Commercialization Promotion Plan' based on the 'Technology Transfer and Commercialization Promotion Act' in order to ensure that the technologies developed through R&D projects lead to new industries and job creation. It is necessary to study what kind of variables are influenced by specific variables in the utilization and process of the developed technology to lead the results as the proportion of national R&D budget is increasing and it is linked to the achievement of R&D purpose. Therefore, an empirical study was conducted to measure factors affecting performance for practitioners who evaluate the performance of SME technology development projects. As a result, Readiness, Technological Performance and Competency Assessment effect Performance Assessment positively.

최근 정부에서 산업이나 문화를 통해 새로운 부가가치를 창출하고 창의적 아이디어를 가지고 있는 인재들에 대해 일자리, 성장 동력을 만들어내는 창조경제에 많은 관심을 가지고 있다. 정부는 연구개발사업을 통해 개발된 기술들이 새로운 산업이나 일자리 마련으로 이어질 수 있도록 '기술의 이전 및 사업화 촉진에 관한 법률'에 근거한 '제5차 기술이전 및 사업화 촉진 계획'에 창조경제 실현을 위한 핵심 과제로 기술 사업화를 강조했다. 국가연구개발사업 예산이 차지하는 비중의 증가와 함께 연구개발 목적에 상응하는 성과로 연결되면서 개발된 기술에 대한 활용성과 과정에서 구체적으로 어떠한 변인에 영향을 받아서 성과로 이어지는지에 대한 연구가 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 중소기업 기술개발사업 성과를 하는 실무자들을 대상으로 성과평가에 영향을 미치는 요인을 측정하고자 실증 연구를 하였다. 그 결과 준비성, 기술성과, 기술개발역량이 기술개발사업성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Institute of Science Technology Evaluation and Planning, "Comparison of R&D Investment between Korea and Major Countries," Statistics Briefing, Vol.16, 2015.
  2. K. W. Kim, "A Study on the Efficiency Analysis and Improvement of Government-Sponsored Industrial R&D Program Using Value Chain DEA Model," 2016.
  3. E. T. Park, "Economics Dictionary," Genyunsa, 2014.
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, "R&D Helper Center,".
  5. S. M. Kim, "Evaluating the Efficiency of Government Sponsored R&D Projects," 2010.
  6. H. D. Cho, "Analysis of System and Structure of Government R&D Project and Proposal of Policy," Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2003.
  7. Korea Testing Laboratory, "Study of Improvement Plan for the Licensing policy," 2002.
  8. X. S. Michael, and M. E. Parry, "The Determinants of the Japanese New Productsuccess," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34, No.1, pp.64-76, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152065
  9. J. H. Lee, "An International Comparative Study on the Factors of Successful New Product Development in Korea and the United States," 2000.
  10. D. K. Ko, "A Study on the Performance Improvement of New Product Development by Implementing R&D Six Sigma," 2003.
  11. R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, and E. P. Y. Tang, "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firma; Some Empiricalfindings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Vol.33, pp.1123-1140, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  12. X. Huang, G. N. Soutar and A. Brown, "Resourceadequacy Innew Productdevelopment: A Discriminantanalysis," European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.4, No.1, pp.53-59, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060110365574
  13. S. Valle, and L. Avella, "Cross-Functionality and Leadership of the New Product Development Teams," European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.6, No.1, pp.32-47, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456319
  14. S. H. Shin, "Development of Analytical Models for the Feasibility of Buildings ," 2009.
  15. S. J. Kim, J. J. Kim, and S. K. Kim, "A Verification of a Feasibility Study Methodology Reflecting the Risk for Expected Return at Privately Financed Construction Projects," Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, Vol.18, No.10, pp.109-116, 2002.
  16. S. M. Koo, and M. W. Jung "A Basic Study on the Current State and Problems of Feasibility Study-Focused on the Evaluation Criteria of the Existing Relative Researches," The Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol.23, No.9, pp.79-88, 2007.
  17. K. H. So, "Competency in the Context of Schooling: It's Meaning and Curricular Implications," The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies. Vol.25, No.3, pp.1-21, 2007.
  18. J. Allen, "A Multicultural Assessment Supervision Model to Guide Research and Practice," Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol.38, No.3, pp.248-258, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.248
  19. H. M. Anderson, D. L. Moore, G. Anaya, and E. Bird, "Student Learning Outcomes Assessment: A Component of Program Assessment," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol.69, No.2, pp.256-268, 2005.
  20. M. C. Kieke, K. Moroz, and A. S. Gort, "The Transformation to a Learner-Centered Community as a Result of Universitywide Assessment," On the Horizon, Vol.15, No.2, pp.107-117, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120710757343
  21. J. Brown, and B. Susan, "Skillful Inventory," Bank Marketing, Vol.31, No.8, pp.16-24, 1999.
  22. Y. H. Choi, J. K. Shin, and S. H. Kim, "The Impact of Top Management, Strategy, and Structure on Performance of Small and Medium Sized Firm," Research of Small and Medium Enterprise, Vol.25, No.2, pp.103-125, 2003.
  23. G. N. Chandler, and S. H. Hanks, "Market Attractiveness Resource-Based Capabilities, Venture Strategies, and Venture Performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.9, pp. 331-349, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6
  24. D. W. Beard, and G. G. Dess, "Corporate-Level Strategy, Business-Level Strategy and Firm Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.20, No.4, pp.836-866, 1981.
  25. M. Sashkin, "A Guide to Participative Management," In J. W. Pfeiffer and L. D. Goodstein (Eds.) The 1984 Annual, Developing Human Resources (pp.227-241). San Diego, CA: Unversity Associates, 1984.
  26. G. Devos, M. Buelens, and D. Bouckenooghe, "Contribution of Content, Context, and Process to Understanding Openness to Organizational Change: Two Experimental Simulation Studies." The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.147, No.6, pp.607-629, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.6.607-630
  27. A. E. Rafferty, and R. H. Simons, "An Examination of the Antecedents of Readiness for Fine-Tuning and Corporate Transformation Changes," Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.20, No.3, pp. 325-350, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-9013-2
  28. S. Lach, "Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence From Israel," The Journal of Nidustrial Economics, Vol,50, No.4, pp.369-390, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00182
  29. R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun, and E. P. Y. Tang, "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Vol.33, pp.1123-1140, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  30. D. S. Lee, "A Study on the Effect of Technological Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability on Business Performance in SMEs of Korea," 2009.
  31. S. K. Kim, "A Study on Technology Innovation Performance through R&D Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability of IT SMEs," 2008.
  32. P. Park, and D. K. Ko, "An Analysis of the Influence of Liquidation Price on the Resettlement of Housing Redevelopment," Korea Real Estate Academy, Vol.24, pp.180-192, 2005.
  33. H. K. Lim,"Analysis of Evaluations and Determinants on Residential Resettlement in Accordance with Urban Regeneration," 2009.
  34. Parry, S. R. "The Quest for Competencies," Training, pp.48-56, 1996.
  35. S. K. Lee, and Y. J. Park, "Distance E-learners' Motivation, Perception, and Learning Behaviour in Vocational Training Environment," Journal of DCS, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.499-508, 2017.