DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale-Korean version for Elite Athletes

확인적 요인분석을 통한 엘리트 선수들의 한국형 운동수행능력 향상에 대한 태도 척도에 관한 연구

  • Park, Jaemyoung (Research Institute of Physical Education and Sport Science, Korea National Sport University) ;
  • Kim, Taegyu (Department of Marine Sports, Pukyong National University)
  • 박재명 (한국체육대학교 체육과학연구소) ;
  • 김태규 (부경대학교 해양스포츠학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.27
  • Accepted : 2018.11.20
  • Published : 2018.11.28

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the various factors structure of Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS) by using confirmatory factor analysis and to provide a suitable questionnaire for elite athletes to measure attitudes toward doping. Three hundred and fifty-five handball players participated in this study and they filled out a self-administrated 17-items PEAS. And 17-items, 11-items, 9-items, 8-items and 6-items PEAS were examined by using confirmatory factor analysis, respectively. 6-items PEAS was suitable to measure attitudes toward doping for adult athletes, and PEAS for adolscent should be developed by being consisted of suitable questions for adolscent athletes.

본 연구는 다양한 유형의 운동수행능력 향상에 대한 태도 척도 (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale, PEAS)에 대해 확인적 요인분석 (confirmatory factor analysis)을 사용하여 요인구조 (factor structure)를 확인함으로써, 한국 엘리트 선수들에게 적합한 한국형 PEAS를 제공하고자 하였다. 355명의 핸드볼 선수를 대상으로 17문항의 PEAS를 자기기입식으로 조사하여 자료를 수집하였고, 17문항과 11문항, 9문항, 8문항 및 6문항에 대해 각각 확인적 요인분석을 시행하였다. 그 결과, 6문항의 PEAS가 한국 엘리트 운동선수들에게 적합한 것으로 확인되었고, 특히 청소년 선수에 비해 성인 선수에게 더 좋은 적합도를 보였다. 이러한 결과는 성인 선수의 도핑에 대한 태도는 6문항의 PEAS를 사용하여 더 정확하게 측정할 수 있을 것을 의미하고, 청소년 선수의 도핑에 대한 태도를 확인하기 위해서는 적합한 문항으로 구성된 설문지가 개발되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

Table 1. Items of PEAS[12]

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_599_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Various types of PEAS

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_599_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Confirmatory factor analysis of various types of PEAS

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_599_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. A. R. Nicholls, D. J. Madigan & A. R. Levy. (2017). A confirmatory factor analysis of the performance enhancement attitude scale for adult and adolescent athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc, 28, 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.10.010
  2. A. R. Nicholls et al. (2014). Coach perceptions of performance enhancement in adolescence: the sport drug control model for adolescent athletes. Performance Enhancement & Health, 3(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2015.07.001
  3. S. R. Bird, C. Goebel, L. M. Burke & R. F. Greaves. (2016). Doping in sport and exercise: anabolic, ergogenic, health and clinical issues. Ann Clin Biochem, 53(2), 196-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215609952
  4. E. K. Kim & T. G. Kim. (2014). Attitudes and Dispositions toward Doping in Korean National Players. Korean Journal of Sports Science, 23(1), 215-224.
  5. A. Petroczi, D. Naughton, T. Nepusz, S. Backhouse & J. Mazanov. (2008). Comfort in big numbers: False Consensus in hypothetical performance enhancing situations. J Occupat Med Toxicol, 3, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-3-19
  6. N. Ntoumanis, J. Y. Ng, V. Barkoukis & S. Backhouse. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(11), 1603-1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4
  7. A. Petroczi & E. Aidman. (2008). Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 3(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-7
  8. L. Lazuras, V. Barkoukis & H. Tsorbatzoudis. (2015). Toward an integrative model of doping use: an empirical study with adolescent athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0232
  9. M. J. Bae, J. J. Yoon, H. Y. Kang & T. G. Kim. (2017). Influences of perfectionism and motivational climate on attitudes towards doping among Korean national athletes: a cross sectional study. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 12(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0138-x
  10. G. Zucchetti, F. Candela & C. Villosio. (2015). Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(2), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.021
  11. A. Petroczi. (2002) Exploring the doping dilemma in elite sport: Can athletes' attitudes be responsible for doping? Published Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, USA.
  12. A. Petroczi & E. Aidman. (2009). Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychol Sport Exerc, 10(3), 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.11.001
  13. A. Petroczi, E. V. Aidman & T. Nepusz. (2008). Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-1
  14. A. Petroczi & T. Nepusz. (2006). The effect of self-impression management in social science doping research. WADA International Conference'Ethics and Social Science Research in Anti-doping', Larnaca, Cyprus.
  15. A. Elbe & R. Brand. (2016). The effect of an ethical decision-making training on young athletes' attitudes toward doping. Ethics Behav, 26(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.976864
  16. D. F. Gucciardi, G. Jalleh & R. J. Donovan. (2010). Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes? Psychol Sport Exerc, 11(6), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.06.002
  17. E. J. Vargo et al. (2014). Perceptions of assisted cognitive and sport performance enhancement among university students in England. Performance Enhancement & Health, 3(2), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2015.02.001
  18. Z. Chu, Y. J. Kim & T. G. Kim. (2018). The Influence of Demographic Information, Knowledge of Doping and Education of Anti-doping on Attitude toward Doping among Elite Handball Players. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 553-560. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.553
  19. T. G. Kim & S. H. Kim. (2014). Study on the validity of PEAS for analyzing doping attitude and disposition of Korean elite player through Rasch model. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 25(3), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2014.25.3.567
  20. T. G. Kim & Y. H. Kim. (2017). Korean national athletes' knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 12(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0092-7
  21. T. G. Kim, J. H. Cha, K. S. Cha & K. H. Kim. (2016). A Study of Factors influencing the Attitudes and Dispositions of Doping in Elite Golf Players. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(8), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.8.527
  22. M. W. Browne & R. Cudeck. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  23. P. M. Bentler. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull, 107(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  24. L. R. Tucker & C. Lewis. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
  25. V. Barkoukis, K. Kartali, L. Lazuras & H. Tsorbatzoudis. (2016). Evaluation of an anti-doping intervention for adolescents: Findings from a school-based study. Sport Management Review, 19(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.12.003
  26. A. Bloodworth & M. McNamee. (2010). Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: The views of talented young British athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(4), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.009
  27. T. G. Kim & E. K. Kim. (2013). Attitudes and Dispositions toward Doping in Adolescent Elite Athletes. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5763/kjsm.2013.31.2.99