디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권11호
  • /
  • Pages.329-334
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사용자 정의 웹 서비스를 위한 IoT 정보 자동생성 도구에 관한 연구

A Study on IoT information Generation Tool for User Defined Web Services

  • 심성호 (세명대학교 정보통신학부)
  • Sim, Sungho (School of Information and Communication Sciences, Semyung University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.10
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

웹 서비스는 네트워크 및 관련 표준을 통하여 운영체제 및 프로그램 언어에 제한을 받지 않고 상호 운영이 가능하도록 해주는 표준화된 소프트웨어 기술로써 서비스를 제공, 발견하여 다양한 서비스를 이용할 수 있게 해주는 분산 컴퓨팅 서비스이다. 웹 서비스의 검색 방법은 기능적 측면만을 고려해 서비스 선정 시 사용자 위주의 검색에 한계점을 가지고 있다. 이러한 문제점을 개선하기 위해 본 연구에서는 IoT 정보 자동생성 도구를 제안하여 웹 서비스 검색 시 IoT 확장 정보를 제공하여 사용자에게 적합한 서비스를 선정할 수 있도록 문제점을 개선한다. 제안하는 IoT 확장 정보 자동생성 도구는 사용자, 사물, 서비스로 구성된 세 가지 요소가 분산된 환경에서 상호 자율적으로 협업하여 Sensing, networking, 정보처리 등에서 발생하는 다양한 정보를 수집 저장한다. 사용자에 의해 생성된 정보를 웹 서비스 검색 시 확장정보로 제공함으로써 사용자에 적합한 서비스 검색을 지원한다. 제안방법은 4차 산업 분야 전반에 걸쳐 적용됨으로 다양한 환경의 요구사항에 맞는 사용자 정의 서비스를 제공 할 수 있다.

Web services are standardized software technologies that enable interoperability of operating systems and programming languages through networks and related standards. Web services are distributed computing services that provide and discover services making it possible to access various services. Since the search method of web service considers only the functional aspect, it has a limitation on user-oriented search when selecting a service. In order to solve these problems, this study proposes an automatic IoT information generation tool, and provides IoT extension information when searching a web service, thereby improving the problem so that a suitable service can be selected for a user. Automatic IoT extension information generation tool proposed in this study collects and stores various information generated in the process of sensing, networking, and information processing by collaborating autonomously in a distributed environment of user, object, and service. The proposed method supports the service search suitable for the user by providing the information generated by the user as extended information when searching the web service. The proposed method can be applied to the 4th industry sector to provide a customized service that meets various environment requirements.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_329_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Convergence of different visions of IoT

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_329_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. User defined IoT Information generator

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_329_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. IoT Information generation process

Table 1. Device Specification Item

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_329_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparative evaluation of the proposed method

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_329_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic & M. Palaniswami. (2013). Internet of Things(IoT): A vision, atchitectural elements, and future directions, Journal on future Generation Computer systems, 29(07), 1645-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010
  2. H. Sundmaeker, P. Guillemin, P. Friess & S. Woelffle. (2010). Vision and challenges for realizing the Internet of Things, European commission-Information Society and Media DG.
  3. G. D. Yeom & K. C. Lee. (2014). A Broker-Based Framework for QoS-Aware Mobile Web Services Selection, Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 19(12), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.12.209
  4. C. J. Kim & C. Y. Song. (2015). A MetaModel for Dynamic Mobile Web Service, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial, 16(10), 6458-6465. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.10.6458
  5. Yiqiao Wang & Eleni Stroulia. (2003), Flexible Interface matching for WebService discovery, Fourth International conference on web Information Systems Engineering, 147-156.
  6. S. Ran. (2003). A model for web services discovery with QoS, ACMSIGecom Exchange, 1(1), 1-10.
  7. Ray Farmer, Adam raybone, Rehan Uddin, Michael Odetayo & Kuo-Ming Chao. (2008). Metadata discovery for a Service-broker Architecture, Internatinal conference on e-Business Engineering, 173-178.
  8. Y. G. Seo & Y. G. Song. (2008). Design and Implementation of Quality Broker Architecture to Web Service Selection based on Autonomic Feedback, The KIPS Transactions:PartD, 15(2), 223-234.
  9. A. Ali, O. Rana, R. AL-Ali & D. Walker. (2003). UDDIe: An Extended Registry for Web Services, Proc. of 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops, 85-89.
  10. L. Atzori & G. Morabito. (2010). The Internet of Thing: A Survey, Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
  11. G. Santucci. (2009). From Internet to Data to Internet of Things, Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Trends of the Internet, 54(15), 2787-2805.
  12. A. Katasonov, O. Kaykova, O. Khriyenko, S. Nikitin & V. Terzizan. (2008). Smart Semantic Middleware for the Internet of Things, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inofrmatics in Control Automation and Robotics.
  13. W. Wahlster. (2008). Web 3.0: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of services and of Things, Lecture at the 2008 Dresden Future Forum.
  14. I. Vazquez. (2009). Social Devices: Semantic Technology for the Internet of Things, Week@ESI.
  15. I. Toma, E. Simperl & G. Hench. (2009). A Joint Roadmap for Semantic Technologies and the Internet of Things, Proceedings of the 3rd STI Roadmapping Workshop.
  16. D. Guinard & T. Vlad. (2009). Toward the Web of Things: Web Mashups for Embedded Devices, Proceedings of the International World wide Web Conference(WWW2009).
  17. OASIS Standard: Web-Services Dynamic Discovery, Version 1.1. Url:http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-dd/discovery/1.1/wsdd-discovery-1.1-spec.html
  18. Bonjour Protocol Specification. Url: http://developer.apple.com/networking/bonjour.
  19. Simple Service Discovery Protocol/1.0. Operating without an Arbiter. http://quimby.gnus.org/internet-drafts/draft-cai-ssdp-v1-03.txt.
  20. Debasis Bandyopadhyay & Jaydip Sen. (2011). Internet of Things-Application and Challenges in Technology and Standardization, Wireless Personal Communications, 58(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5