디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

현행 학교 문화예술교육 정책의 맥락에 관한 탐색 연구 : Cooper 등의 4차원 정책분석 모형 적용

A Study on the Exploration of the School Arts & Culture Education Policy : Application of Cooper's Four Dimension Model

  • 투고 : 2018.08.10
  • 심사 : 2018.11.20
  • 발행 : 2018.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 Cooper, Fusarelli와 Randall(2004)의 4차원 정책분석 모형을 활용하여 학교 문화예술교육 정책을 둘러싼 핵심 쟁점을 규범적, 구조적, 구성적, 기술적 차원별로 분석하고, 개선을 위한 시사점을 제시하였다. 연구방법은 문헌분석으로서 그동안 축적된 정책문서와 학술논문 등을 근거자료로 활용하였다. 분석결과, 학교 문화예술교육 정책의 효과적 추진을 위해 규범적 차원에서는 국가성장 이데올로기 및 과도한 관료적 합리성 추구의 극복이, 구조적 차원에서는 교사수권형 교육과정으로의 개혁을 통한 실질적 형식과 내용의 확보가, 구성적 차원에서는 문화예술교육에 대한 인식 변화를 통한 구성원 간의 명확한 역할 구분이, 그리고 기술적 차원에서는 확고한 교육학적 기준에 근거한 자원의 합리적 배분이 요청된다. 이상의 연구결과를 바탕으로 국가의 기초학술연구 진흥, 교육당사자의 의견수용, 교원의 문화경험기회 확대, 통합적 문화예술교육 연수체제 구축, 교원양성체제 정비, 예술강사의 교육전문성 강화 등을 향후 연구 및 실천과제로 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the issues of school arts & culture education policy in Korea, using the four dimensional model of Cooper, Fusarelli, & Randall(2004). Research method is literature analysis, the accumulated policy documents and academic papers were used as the basis data. As a result, the followings are required for effective policy outcome: From the normative dimension, overcoming the pursuit of national growth ideology and bureaucratic rationality; from the structural dimension, securing of practical forms and content through the reform to the teacher mandate system in curriculum operation; from the constituentive dimension, clear division of roles among members through the change of awareness about arts & culture education; and finally from the technical dimension, rational allocation of resources based on firm educational criteria. Building upon the results, promotion of basic academic research, accepting the opinions of arts & culture education parties concerned, expansion of opportunities for cultural art experience of teachers, building up the integrated arts & culture education teacher training system, the reorganization of the teacher training system, and raising the professionalism of teaching artists.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_57_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. School Arts & Culture Education

Table 1. Current Status of School Arts & Culture Education Policies

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_57_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. School Arts & Culture Education Policy Analysis frame

DJTJBT_2018_v16n11_57_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education. (2018). The Basic Plan for The Revitalization of School Arts Education.
  2. The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2018). A Comprehensive Plan for Arts & Culture Education.
  3. The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2014). Medium and Long-term Development Plans for Culture & Arts Education.
  4. G. R. Jeon. (2017). A Study of Academic Research Trend on Arts & Cultural Education. The Journal of Cultural Policy, 31(1), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.16937/jcp.31.1.201701.76
  5. M. S. Kim. (2001). Art Education Movement in Transition from 19th to 20th century in Germany. The Journal of Educational Research, 17, 29-53.
  6. Korea Creative Content Agency. (2018). Fourth Quarter 2017 and Annual Content Industry Trend Analysis Reports.
  7. A. Reble. (2005). Geschichte der padagogik. Trans. Y. G. Jung & three others. Seoul : Moonumsa.
  8. B. Cooper, L. Fusarelli & E. Randall. (2014). Better policies, better schools. Trans. S. H. Ga, B. M. Kim & J. P. Park. Seoul : Academy Press.
  9. M. H. Baek. (2016). A Study on the Professional's Perceptions of Arts & Culture Education Instructor System. The Korean Journal of Arts Education, 14(4), 1-21.
  10. Korea Arts & Culture Education Service. (2014). A Study on the Effect Analysis of the Arts Instructor Support Project.
  11. Y. K. Kim. (2017). Voices of Three Art Educators: Experience, Views and Vision of Art Educators Majored in Educational Drama to the Art Education in School. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 20(3), 259-288. https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2017.20.3.008
  12. K. W. Hong. (2014). Evaluating Arts Education Program - Policy Implication of Measuring the Effect of Orchestra Education Program. Korean Association of Arts Management, 30, 35-59.
  13. Y. S. Ha. (2016). Institutional analysis. Gyeonggi : Dasanbooks.
  14. Korea Arts & Culture Education Service. (2017). Actual Condition Investigation on School Arts & Culture Education.
  15. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. (2018). Secondary Supervision Plan.
  16. Hansun Foundation for Freedom & Happiness. (2007). Plan and practice for the advance of the korean educational reform.
  17. K. M. Baek. (2015). Arts and Culture Education in Public Education: A Study on the Perceptions of Teaching. Artists. Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 16(6), 231-238.
  18. M. S. Song & K. Y. Kim. (2013). A Study on Culture and Art Education Supporting Organizations. Journal of Korean Dance, 31(2), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.15726/jkd.2013.31.2.005
  19. https://www.arte.or.kr
  20. Board of Education, Culture, Sports and Tourism. (2016). National Assembly Inspection Result report.
  21. D. H. Jang. (2009). A Case Study of 2008 College Entrance Examination System Reform: From the Viewpoint of Institutional Congruence of Educational Policy. The Journal of Politics of Education, 16(3), 53-82.
  22. Y. G. Jung & five others. (2002). An introduction to education. Seoul : Moonumsa.
  23. D. Tyack & L. Cuban. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: a century of public school reform. Trans. C. U. Gwon & D. G. Park. Seoul : Pakyoung Story.