디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권12호
  • /
  • Pages.243-256
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

융복합시대의 기술적 기업가정신, 흡수역량과 창의성과 간에서 동기부여의 조절효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Moderating Effects of Motivation in Technological Entrepreneurship, Absorption Capacity and Creative Product in the Convergence Era

  • 조용화 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅대학원) ;
  • 한병철 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 김은경 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Cho, Yong-Hwa (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Han, Byung-Cheol (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyeong (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Song, Chan-sub (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Kyu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.25
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 조직의 창의성과를 높이고 외부 지식의 활용을 위한 방안으로 기술적 기업가정신과 흡수역량(잠재흡수역량, 실현흡수역량), 창의성과의 관계를 실증 분석하고, 동기부여의 조절 효과를 밝히고자 한다. 이러한 변수간의 관계를 밝히기 위해 문헌 연구를 통해 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였고, 경북의 전자 산업 종사자를 대상으로487부의 설문지를 수집하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 기술적 기업가정신은 창의성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것과 기술적 기업가정신에서 흡수역량, 창의성과로의 절차적인 효과를 확인하였다. 또한 기술적 기업가정신과, 잠재흡수역량의 관계에서 내재적 동기부여의 조절효과와 잠재흡수역량, 실현흡수역량의 관계에서 외재적 동기부여의 조절 효과를 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 외부 지식의 활용과 창의성과를 제고하는데 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

To use external knowledge for Creative product, This study suggests the model of Technological entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity - Potential absorptive capacity(PACAP), Realized absorptive capacity (RACAP), Creative product and moderating effect of Motivation. This model was set up though literature research method. Empirical analysis was conducted by using 487 questionnaires from workers of electronic industry in Kyung-buk. Results of study are as followings; 1. Technological entrepreneurship related positively to Creative product. 2. Creative product was affected through process in order of Technological entrepreneurship, PACAP, RACAP. 3. Intrinsic motivation strengthens the relation between Technological entrepreneurship and PACAP. 4. Extrinsic motivation strengthens the relation between PACAP and RACAP. This results will contribute to the improvement of Creativity and the utilization of external knowledge.

키워드

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Model of absorptive capacity[4]

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Research model

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Result of Structural Equation Model

Table 1. Structure of the sample

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Reliability Analysis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Confirmation factor analysis

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Squared Multiple Correlation

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Construct Reliability and AVE

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Coefficient of Correlation’s square and EVA

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Model fit

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Result of Intrinsic group’s CMIN difference and coefficient

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Result of Extrinsic group’s CMIN difference and coefficient

DJTJBT_2018_v16n12_243_t0009.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. D. Richard & T. Byers. (2005). Technology ventures: from idea to enterprise. Newyork : McGraw-hill.
  2. H. Chesbrough & C. Winter. (2014). Managing Inside-Out Open Innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 208. DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0011
  3. F. T. Rothaermel, S. Kotha & H. K. Steensma. (2006). International Market Entry by U.S. Internet Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Country Risk, National Culture, and Market Size. Journal of Management, 32(1), 56-82. DOI : 10.1177/0149206305277793
  4. S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. DOI : 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  5. A. Zaheer & G. G. Bell. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809-825. DOI : 10.1002/smj.482
  6. P. J. Lane & M. Lubatkin. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 461-477. DOI : 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::aid-smj 953>3.3.co;2-c
  7. N. H. Park. (2004). Organizational Behavior, Seoul : Pakyoungsa. DOI : 10.978.897189/3371
  8. Y. B. Park. (2009). Modern Business and Management, Seoul : Chungram. DOI : 10.978.895972/1092
  9. H. Stevenson & D. Gumpert. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship.
  10. M. L. Morris & M. R. Bellon. (2004). Participatory plant breeding research: Opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica, 136(1), 21-35. DOI : 10.1023/b:euph.0000019509.37769.b1
  11. S. Globe, G. W. Levy & C. M. Schwartz. (1973). Key Factors and Events in the Innovation Process. Research Management, 16(4), 8-15. DOI : 10.1080/00345334.1973.11756189
  12. R. Rothwell & W. Zegveld. (1982). Innovation and the small and medium sized firm. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Pub.
  13. D. Miller. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  14. J. G. Covin & D. P. Slevin. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250100107
  15. A. H. Lassen, F. Gertsen & J. O. Riis. (2006). The Nexus of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Radical Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4), 359-372. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00406.x
  16. S. S. Kim. (2014). Entrepreneurship Successful Creative Executives: Theory and practice, Seoul : Topbooks.
  17. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  18. D. L. Sexton & N. Bowman-Upton. (1990). Female and male entrepreneurs: Psychological characteristics and their role in gender-related discrimination. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 29-36. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(90)90024-n
  19. C. W. Lee. (1999). A Study on the Role and Organizational Performance of Organizational Entrepreneurship: Focused on Fundamental Theories of Resources. Ph.D Thesis, Seoul National University Graduate School.
  20. C. Petti & S. Zhang. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7-25. DOI : 10.1108/17468771111105631
  21. W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. DOI : 10.2307/2393553
  22. M. Alavi & D. E. Leidner. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136. DOI : 10.2307/3250961
  23. B. S. Kim & H. S. Kim. (2009). Knowledge exploration, absorption capacity and speed of innovation. Strategic Management Research, 12(1), 1-24.
  24. A. C. Boynton, R. W. Zmud & G. C. Jacobs. (1994). The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299. DOI : 10.2307/249620
  25. F. A. J. Van den Bosch, H. W. Volberda & M. de Boer. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568. DOI : 10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
  26. A. K. Gupta & V. Govindarajan. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic management journal, 473-496.
  27. A. Y. Kim & A. O. Soon. (2001). Classification of motive type according to degree of self - crystallinity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(4), 97-119.
  28. T. M. Amabile. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  29. R. W. Woodman, J. E. Sawyer & R. W. Griffin. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
  30. A. Cummings & G. R. Oldham. (1997). Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38. DOI : 10.2307/41165920
  31. D. Miller & P. H. Friesen. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management science, 24(9), 921-933. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.921
  32. S. A. Zahra. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289-321. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(95)00128-x
  33. C. E. Shalley. (1995). Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483-503. DOI : 10.5465/256689
  34. S. Boerner & D. Gebert. (2005). Organizational culture and creative processes: Comparing German theater companies and scientific institutes. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(2), 209-220. DOI : 10.1002/nml.101
  35. L. D. McLean. (2005). Organizational Culture's Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246. DOI : 10.1177/1523422305274528
  36. A. B. Hargadon & B. A. Bechky. (2006). When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500. DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
  37. N. K. Napier & M. Nilsson. (2006). The Development of Creative Capabilities in and out of Creative Organizations: Three Case Studies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3), 268-278. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00396.x
  38. S. Gilmore & S. Warren. (2007). Themed article: Emotion online: Experiences of teaching in a virtual learning environment. Human Relations, 60(4), 581-608. DOI : 10.1177/0018726707078351
  39. B. J. Zimmerman. (n.d.). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, 202-231. DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511527692.009
  40. J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
  41. E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York : Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  42. J. M. Harackiewicz & G. Manderlink. (1984). A process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20(6), 531-551. DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(84)90042-8
  43. W. K. Lee. (2013). The Effect of the Motivation Induced by Management Accounting System on Firm Performance. Management Research, 28, 267-298.
  44. Y. J. Jo. (2014). A Study on the Effect of Entrepreneurship on the Intention of Entrepreneurship. Digital convergence research, 12(11), 197-208. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.11.197
  45. J. Y. Choi. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effect of the Absorption Capacity of Venture Firms on Technological Innovation Performance. Digital convergence research, 16(1), 125-134. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.1.125
  46. K. O'Quin & S. P. Besemer. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 267-278. DOI : 10.1080/10400418909534323