디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권12호
  • /
  • Pages.147-152
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

럭셔리 vs. 비(非)셔리 브랜드의 광고에서 배경음악 내 적합도가 브랜드 기억에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Fit in Background Music on Brand Memory for Luxury vs. Non-luxury Brand Advertising

  • Min, Dongwon (School of Business and Economics, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.18
  • 심사 : 2018.12.20
  • 발행 : 2018.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

선행문헌들은 사람들이 럭셔리 브랜드에 대해 非럭셔리 브랜드보다 추상적으로 아이덴티티를 형성하며, 브랜드 처리에 있어 적합의 영향을 많이 받음을 보여왔다. 본 연구는 럭셔리 브랜드에 대해 非럭셔리 브랜드 광고에 있어 실행단서 내의 적합 vs. 非적합이 브랜드의 기억에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 특히 음악에 주목하여 배경음악과 사운드 로고가 적합하거나 그렇지 않은 조건에서 피험자들이 브랜드를 얼마나 잘 기억하는 지 살펴보았는데, 럭셔리 브랜드 광고에서 적합의 긍정적 영향이 강하게 나타났다. 이 같은 결과는 실행단서와 브랜드 이미지나 실행단서 간 적합 뿐 아니라 실행단서 '내'에서의 적합 또한 긍정적 영향력이 있음을 보여준다는 데에서도 의미가 있다. 본 연구는 이 같은 결과를 바탕으로 학문적 및 시사점을 제안하였다.

Current research examined the effect of fit in the executional cue on brand memory for luxury and non-luxury brand advertising. In particular, this research looked at music to see how well individuals memorize information about brands where background music and sound logo fit or non-fit in the advertisement. As results, the influence of fit in music was higher in the luxury brand advertisement than that of non-luxury brand. The findings demonstrate fit leads more positive response not only in the relationship between the executional cue and the brand image or executional cues, as seen in the literature, but also in the executional cue. Moreover, the effect of fit in the executional cue is greater for the luxury (vs. non-luxury) brand. Based on the results, present research proposes the academic and practical implications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. E. Ko & C. M. Megehee. (2012). Fashion Marketing of Luxury Brands: Recent Research Issues and Contributions. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1395-1398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.004
  2. Deloitte. (2018). https://www2.deloitte.com
  3. D. Min. (2016). The Influences of Charity and Negative on Purchase Intention toward Counterfeit Products Perception of Production on Purchase Intent toward Luxury brand: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Guilt Reduction. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(6), 85-91. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.6.85
  4. A. J. Kim & E. Ko. (2012). Do Social Media Marketing Activities Enhance Customer Equity? An Empirical Study of Luxury Fashion Brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014
  5. C. M. Albrecht, C. Backhaus, H. Gurzki & D. M. Woisetschlager. (2013). Drivers of Brand Extension Success: What Really Matters for Luxury Brands. Psychology and Marketing, 30(8), 647-659. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.70.2.18
  6. Q. Bian & S. Forsythe. (2012). Purchase Intention for Luxury Lrands: A Cross- cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1443-1451. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010
  7. P. Randhawa, R. J. Calantone & C. M. Voorhees. (2015). The Pursuit of Counterfeited Luxury: An Examination of the Negative Side Effects of Close Consumer-brand Connections. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 2395-2403.
  8. C. Tynan, S. McKechnie & C. Chhuon. (2010). Co-creating Value for Luxury Brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1156-1163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.012
  9. J. N. Kapferer & V. Bastien. (2009). The Specificity of Luxury Management: Turning Marketing Upside Down. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5-6), 311-322. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2008.51
  10. I. Phau & G. Prendergast. (2001). Consuming Luxury Brands: The Relevance of the Rarity Principle. Journal of Brand Management, 8(2), 122-137. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540013
  11. H. Moon & D. E. Sprott. (2016). Ingredient Branding for a Luxury Brand: The Role of Brand and Product Fit. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5768-5774. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.173
  12. P. E. Green, Y. Wind & A. K. Jain. (1972). Preference Measurement of Item Collections. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 371-377. DOI: 10.2307/3149298
  13. A. S. Mattila & J. Wirtz. (2001). Congruency of Scent and Music as a Driver of In-store Evaluations and Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 273-289. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00042-2
  14. F. Yalch. (1991). Memory in a Jingle Jungle: Music as a Mnemonic Device in Communicating Advertising Slogans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 268-275. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.268
  15. C. II, Bruner. (1990). Music, Mood, and Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 94-104. DOI: 10.2307/1251762
  16. D. S. Dunbar. (1990). Music and Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 9(3), 197-203. DOI: 10.1080/02650487.1990.11107148
  17. D. J. MacInnis & C. W. Park. (1991). The Differential Role of Characteristics of Music on High- and Low- Involvement Consumers' Processing of Ads. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 161-173. DOI: 10.1086/209249
  18. D. Min. (2016), The Effect of Emotional Congruency in Advertising Music on Memory. Korean Management Research, 45(4), 1309-1337. DOI: 10.17287/kmr.2016.45.4.1309
  19. D. MacCannell. (1978). Public Places and Private Spaces: The Psychology of Work, Play, and Living Environments. Albert Mehrabian. American Journal of Sociology, 83(4), 1060-1062. DOI: 10.1086/226666
  20. R. E. Radocy & J. D. Boyle. (2003). Psychological Foundations of Musical Behavior, 4th ed. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Ltd. ISBN- 13: 978-0398088033
  21. C. L. Krumhansl. (1990). Melodic Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Descriptions, in Music, Language, Speech, and Brain, Johan Sundberg, Lennart Nord, and Rolf Carlson, ed. London: MacMillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_25
  22. D. Min. (2016). The Effect of Psychological Disposition on Omni-Channel Shopping in the Age of Digital Convergene: Focusing on Extraversion- Introversion and Variety-Seeking Tendency. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(1), 91-97. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.1.91