구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제34권4호
  • /
  • Pages.280-289
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악 구치 단일임플란트 수복에서 임플란트 길이에 따른 치관-임플란트 비율이 임플란트안정성 및 변연골소실에 주는 영향

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio of short vs long implants on implant stability and marginal bone loss in the mandibular single molar implant

  • 백연화 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김봉주 (서울대학교 치과병원 치의생명과학연구원) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 권호범 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임영준 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Baek, Yeon-Wha (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Bongju (Dental Life Science Research Institute and Clinical Translational Research Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Ho-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.07
  • 심사 : 2018.10.10
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 임플란트의 길이 및 치관-임플란트 비율(crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio)이 임플란트의 안정성과 임플란트 변연골 소실량(MBL)에 영향을 주는지 알아보기 위함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 연구대상자로 하악 구치부에 단일치를 상실한 46명의 환자를 선별하였다. 대조군에는 총 19개의 직경 5.0 mm, 길이 10 mm의 임플란트(CMI IS-III $active^{(R)}$ long implant)를 식립하였고, 실험군에는 직경 5.5 mm, 길이 6.6, 7.3, 8.5 mm의 임플란트 총 27개(CMI IS-III $active^{(R)}$ short implant)를 식립하였다. 각각의 임플란트는 디지털 방식으로 술 전 제작한 수술가이드를 사용하여 식립하였고 임시보철물을 장착하여 즉시부하를 시행하였다. 술 후 3개월에 CAD-CAM 방식으로 제작한 지르코니아 크라운으로 최종 수복하였다. 술 후 48주에 ISQ 값과 변연골 소실량을 측정하여 치관-임플란트 비율과 ISQ 및 변연골 소실량 간의 상관관계를 비교하였다. 결과: 두 그룹 모두 안정도 및 변연골 소실량 면에서 성공적인 결과를 나타내었다. 술 후 48주에 측정한 두 그룹간 ISQ와 변연골 소실량 값은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 없었다(P > 0.05). 치관-임플란트 비율과 안정성 및 치관-임플란트 비율과 변연골 소실량 간에 어떤 상관관계도 관찰되지 않았다(P > 0.05). 결론: 두 그룹의 하악 단일 임플란트에서 치관-임플란트 비율은 안정성 및 변연골 소실량에 영향을 주지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 골높이가 부족한 하악에서 단일 임플란트 수복 시, 짧은 임플란트는 상대적으로 높은 치관-임플란트 비율에도 불구하고 제한된 조건 하에서 적절한 대안이 될 수 있다.

Purpose: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether implant length and the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio influence implant stability and peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and Methods: 46 patients with single tooth missing in the posterior molar region of the mandible were included in this study. 19 implants (CMI IS-III $active^{(R)}$ long implant) of 5.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length were installed for the control group, while 27 implants (CMI IS-III $active^{(R)}$ short implant) of 5.5 mm diameter and 6.6, 7.3 or 8.5 mm length were placed for the experimental group. Each implant was inserted and immediately loaded using the digitally pre-fabricated surgical template and provisional restoration. The CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crown was fabricated at 3 months after the surgery as a definitive restoration. The ISQ value and the MBL was measured at 48 weeks after the surgery. The correlation between the C/I ratio, MBL, and secondary implant stability was analyzed. Results: Successful results in terms of ISQ and MBL were achieved with both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of ISQ values and MBL at 48 weeks after the surgery (P > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the C/I ratio and secondary stability as well as the C/I ratio and the MBL (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The influence of C/I ratio in both groups was not shown on the stability nor the marginal bone loss in implants supporting single crown of the mandible. Short implant could be a preferable alternative option in the reduced bone height mandible under the limited condition despite its higher C/I ratio.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:502-10.
  2. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-53.
  3. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:220-30.
  4. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 1: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:381-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x
  5. Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia C. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough-surface dental implants. J Periodontol 2009;80:1700-18. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090107
  6. Mangano FG, Shibli JA, Sammons RL, Iaculli F, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of followup. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:933-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12181
  7. Rossi F, Botticelli D, Cesaretti G, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:458-64.
  8. Esposito M, Cannizzaro G, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone? Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:301-11.
  9. Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Ghisolfi M, Storelli S. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review. Minerva Stomatol 2010;59:23-31.
  10. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:667-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01736.x
  11. Grossmann Y, Sadan A. The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:559-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.006
  12. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implantsupported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:119-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x
  13. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis; Elsevier; 2006. p. 42-81.
  14. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago; Quintessence; 1997. p. 85-103.
  15. Pommer B, Heuberer S, Nahler L, Watzek G. How much bone loss can be prevented by alveolar ridge preservation? Systematic literature review and meta- analysis. ImplantNewsPerio 2012;9:795-9.
  16. Simons WF, De Smit M, Duyck J, Coucke W, Quirynen M. The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1051-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12398
  17. Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of nonsubmerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.110207.x
  18. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  19. Bulaqi HA, Mousavi Mashhadi M, Safari H, Samandari MM, Geramipanah F. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:548-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.007
  20. Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF, Mattos Mda G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution on morse taper implants surface. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:206-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.02.003
  21. Cinar D, Imirzalioglu P. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:e1-e10.
  22. Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, Consonni D, Nocini PF. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:240-51.
  23. Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:1090-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12546
  24. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:67-72.
  25. Hof M, Pommer B, Zukic N, Vasak C, Lorenzoni M, Zechner W. Influence of prosthetic parameters on peri-implant bone resorption in the first year of loading: a multi-factorial analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17 Suppl 1:e183-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12153
  26. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:275-82.
  27. Mangano F, Frezzato I, Frezzato A, Veronesi G, Mortellaro C, Mangano C. The Effect of Crownto-Implant Ratio on the Clinical Performance of Extra-Short Locking-Taper Implants. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:675-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002562
  28. Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY. Stability of implants placed in different bone types. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007;42:292-3.
  29. Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, Tozum TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:113-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00097.x
  30. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83.
  31. Robling AG, Turner CH. Mechanical Signaling for Bone Modeling and Remodeling. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2009;19:319-38. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i4.50
  32. Norton MR. The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1333-43.
  33. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:233-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01473.x
  34. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk R, Denzer A, Cochran D, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
  35. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional $SLA^{(R)}$ titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:481-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01341.x
  36. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
  37. Piattelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Piattelli M. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:805-10.
  38. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87:303-11.
  39. Kim JH, Yang JY, Kim YK, Heo YK, Yeo IS. Retrospective results of implants for partially edentulous posterior jaws according to time points of early loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1293-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2884
  40. Kumar ABT, Khalia N, Gayathri GV, Kumar BHD, Mehta DS. Peri-implant crestal bone preservation: Where do we stand? Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2013;4:72-7. https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-Journals-10012-1096
  41. Ryu HS, Namgung C, Lee JH, Lim YJ. The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:547-54. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.547
  42. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-8.
  43. Renouard F, Arnoux JP, Sarment DP. Five-mmdiameter implants without a smooth surface collar: report on 98 consecutive placements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:101-7.
  44. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Peled M. Resonance frequency analysis in immediate loading of dental implants. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993) 2003;20:80-8, 104.
  45. Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:89-95.
  46. Baggi L, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G, Sannino G. Comparative Evaluation of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Based on Platform-Switching Concept: Influence of Diameter, Length, Thread Shape, and In-Bone Positioning Depth on Stress-Based Performance. Comput Math Methods Med 2013;2013:250929.
  47. Simunek A, Strnad J, Kopecka D, Brazda T, Pilathadka S, Chauhan R, Slezak R, Capek L. Changes in stability after healing of immediately loaded dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1085-92.
  48. Dominiak M, Gedrange T. New perspectives in the diagnostic of gingival recession. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014;23:857-63. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/27907
  49. Yazicioglu D, Bayram B, Oguz Y, Cinar D, Uckan S. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model with Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol 2016;42:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-doi-D-14-00003
  50. Zietek M, Gedrange T, Mikulewicz M. Long term evaluation of biomaterial application in surgical treatment of periodontosis. J Physiol Pharmacol 2008;59 Suppl 5:81-6.