DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시재생 뉴딜사업 주거지 재생을 위한 정책 개선 방안 연구

A Study of the Policy Improvement for the Housing Area as the Urban Regeneration of New Deal Project

  • 투고 : 2018.09.13
  • 심사 : 2018.11.14
  • 발행 : 2018.12.30

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the status and limitations of the activation plan as a result of the change in urban regeneration paradigm. In particular, the change in housing life was considered following the guidelines of the New Deal project. Specifically, the three types - General Neighborhood, Housing Support, and DongneSaligi - were analyzed from the perspective of organization, space and program. In addition, the master plan and unit project, the organization and progress, and the budget plan were reviewed. As a result, the New Deal project for urban regeneration is importance on economic regeneration, which, unlike the integrated and continuous guide proposed by the government, could limit the individual progress of transitional organizations, 2-dimensional planing and various programs. Thus, first, in order to supplement the organization's verticality and inefficiency in progress, the annual business assessment should be discouraged and the permit and progress of the project should be determined at the local government level. Second, integrated and multidimensional planning is necessary to produce synergy effects in the physical environment. Finally, the link between program unit projects and the economic effects can be considered.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Park, H. (2018). A Study of Urban Regeneration in Local Cities through the Establishment of Compact City in Japan, Residnetial Environment Institute of Korea, 16(2), 197-219.
  2. Yoo, H., & Yoon, H. (2012). A Study on the Support System and Indicators for Rehabilitation of Deteriorated Residential Blocks in Japan, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(11), 185-194.
  3. Lee, J., & Nam, J. (2016). Study on the Legal Coherence of The Urban Regeneration and Assistance Act and Urban Regeneration-related Law, Korea Urban Management Association, 29(1), 35-62.
  4. Jung, K., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2016). An Empirical Study on Project Type and Funds Supply Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Priority Regions, The Korean Regional Development Association, 28(2), 19-27.
  5. Park, S., Seo, S., & Lim, K. (2015). The Roles and Supporting Strategies of National Urban Regeneration Assistance Agency, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 16(4), 29-46.
  6. Kwon, Y., & Joo, S. (2015). Study of Urban Regeneration Strategy Based on Creating Shared Value, Urban Design Institute of Korea, 16(6), 35-51.
  7. Shin, Y., & Lee, S. (2016). A Study on the Governance of Domestic and Overseas Urban Regeneration Projects, Korea Institute of Spatial Design, 11(6), 157-172.
  8. Grant, K., Princen, B., Zielony, T., & Douglas, S. (2006). Shrinking Cities: Volume 1: International Research, Hatje Cantz Publishers, 20-34.
  9. Ministry of Construction and Transportation, The understanding of a policy for 'Making a Livable City', 2007.
  10. Intereangency Committees, New Deal Roadmap to Change My Life, 2018.3.
  11. Reports from the Cabinet Office, The New Deal pilot project _68 locations, the Cabinet Office, 2017.12.14
  12. MOLIT, The City Manual, MOLIT, 2017, 184.
  13. MOLIT, 2017' the Selection Plan of the New Deal Projects, MOLIT, 2017.9.
  14. MOLIT, The Guideline of the Urban Regeneration Plan and Implementation for the New Deal Projects_ Focused on Urban Economic Infrastructure, MOLIT, 2016.
  15. MOLIT, The Guideline of the Urban Regeneration Plan and Implementation for the New Deal Projects, MOLIT, 2018.
  16. AURI, The Suggestions of Improvement Schemes for Urban Regeneration Act, 2015.
  17. KRIHS, Future Prospect and Strategy for Urban Regeneration Project, 2017.
  18. KRIHS, Urban Regeneration Policy of Packaged Style for Urban and Regional Resilience, 2017.
  19. KRIHS, Feasible Strategies to Address Gentrification - relataed Issues in Urban Regeneration Areas, 2017.