DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Successional changes in plant composition over 15 years in a created wetland in South Korea

  • Received : 2018.08.31
  • Accepted : 2018.10.30
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Backgrounds: The main purpose of this research was to assess changes in vegetation structure, wetland index, and diversity index for a 15-year-old created wetland in Jincheon, South Korea. The created wetland consists of four sub-wetlands: a kidney-shaped wetland, a ditch, an ecological pond, and a square wetland. Vegetation and water depth data were collected at each site in 1999 and 2013, and Shannon diversity and wetland indices were calculated. Results: The total number of plant species increased from 18 in 1999 to 50 in 2013, and the ecological pond in 1999 and the ditch in 2013 presented the highest diversity indices (2.5 and 3.2, respectively). Plant species were less diverse in 1999 than in 2013, presumably because these initial wetlands were managed periodically for water purification and installation of test beds. The proportion of wetland plants, including obligate wetland and facultative wetland species, decreased from 83 to 56%, whereas upland plants, including obligate upland and facultative upland species, increased from 17 to 44%. After ceasing water supply, water depth in all four sub-wetlands declined in 2013. Thus, upland plants established more readily at these sites, resulting in higher diversity and lower wetland indices than in 1999. Conclusions: The major floristic differences between 1999 and 2013 were an increase in the number of upland plants and a decrease in wetland species. Although wetland indices were lower in 2013, the created wetland performed important ecosystem functions by providing habitats for wetland and upland plants, and the overall species diversity was high.

Keywords

References

  1. Baart I, Gschopf C, Blaschke AP, Preiner S, Hein T. Prediction of potential macrophyte development in response to restoration measures in an urban riverine wetland. Aquat Bot. 2010;93:153-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.06.002
  2. Casanova MT, Brock MA. How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecol. 2000;147:237-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875226637
  3. Chen Y-N, Zilliacus H, Li W-H, Zhang H-F, Chen Y-P. Ground-water level affects plant species diversity along the lower reaches of the Tarim river, Western China. J Arid Environ. 2006;66:231-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.11.009
  4. Choi J-Y, Jang J-D, Jeong K-S, Joo G-J. Effects of habitat conditions in created wetlands on sustaining wintering waterfowl in riverine plains, Nakdong River, South Korea. J. Ecol. Environ. 2015;38:343-52. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.035
  5. Choung Y, Lee WT, Cho K-H, Joo KY, Min BM, Hyun J-O, Lee KS. Categorizing vascular plant species occurring in wetland ecosystems of the Korean Peninsula. Chuncheon: Center for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration; 2012.
  6. Choung Y, Lee WT, Cho K-H, Joo KY, Min BM, Hyun J-O, Lee KS, Lee K, Seo A. Status of wetland vascular plant species in Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2015;38:541-4. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.057
  7. Chu YS, Cho H, Cho K-H. Response of vegetation to shoreline alternation in a large reservoir. Ecol Resil Infrast. 2016;3:143-51 (in Korean).
  8. Cole CA, Urban CA, Russo P, Murray J, Hoyt D, Brooks RP. Herbaceous plant community composition in created wetlands over seven years in northern New York, USA. Stud Hist Gard Des. 2013;33:235-47.
  9. Coles-Ritchie MC, Roberts DW, Kershner JL, Henderson RC. Use of a wetland index to evaluate changes in riparian vegetation after livestock exclusion. J Am Water Resour As. 2007;43:731-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00058.x
  10. Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA. Macrophyte growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2006;63:1744-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.014
  11. Havens KJ, Priest I, Walter I, Berquist H. Investigation and long-term monitoring of Phragmites australis within Virginia's constructed wetland sites. Environ Manag. 1997;21:599-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900052
  12. Ho M, Richardson CJ. A five year study of floristic succession in a restored urban wetland. Ecol Eng. 2013;61:511-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.05.001
  13. Hsu C-B, Hsieh H-L, Yang L, Wu S-H, Chang J-S, Hsiao S-C, Su H-C, Yeh C-H, Ho YS, Lin H-J. Biodiversity of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng. 2011;37:1533-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.002
  14. Kim C-H, Choi Y-E, Kim J-W, Myung H, Lee S-I. 3-year change of vegetation and life form at the man-made wetland in Sinpyeoncheon city. Korean J Environ Ecol. 2011;25:57-64 (in Korean).
  15. Kim C-H, Myung H. A 4-year follow-up survey of flora at the human-made wetlands along Boknaecheon of Juam Lake. J Korea Soc Environ Restor Technol. 2008;11:25-37 (in Korean).
  16. Kivaisi AK. The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecol Eng. 2001;16:545-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00113-0
  17. Lee TB. Coloured flora of Korea. Seoul: Hyang Mun Sa; 2003. (in Korean)
  18. Makkay K, Pick FR, Gillespie L. Predicting diversity versus community composition of aquatic plants at the river scale. Aquat Bot. 2008;88:338-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.011
  19. Mitsch WJ, Day JW. Restoration of wetlands in the Mississippi-Ohio-Missouri (MOM) River Basin: experience and needed research. Ecol Eng. 2006;26:55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.09.005
  20. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink J. Wetlands. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
  21. Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Anderson CJ, Altor AE, Hernandez ME. Creating riverine wetlands: ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects. Ecol Eng. 2005;25:510-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.04.014
  22. Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Stefanik KC, Nahlik AM, Anderson CJ, Bernal B, Hernandez M, Song K. Creating wetlands: primary succession, water quality changes, and self-design over 15 years. Bioscience. 2012;62:237-50. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.3.5
  23. Moore HH, Niering WA, Marsicano LJ, Dowdell M. Vegetation change in created emergent wetlands (1988-1996) in Connecticut (USA). Wetl Ecol Manag. 1999;7:177-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008434630473
  24. Noon KF. A model of created wetland primary succession. Landscape Urban Plann. 1996;34:97-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(95)00209-X
  25. Odland A, del Moral R. Thirteen years of wetland vegetation succession following a permanent drawdown, Myrkdalen Lake, Norway. Plant Ecol. 2002;162:185-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020388910724
  26. Ortmann-Ajkai A, Csicsek G, Hollos R, Magyaros V, Wagner L, Loczy D. Twentyyears' changes of wetland vegetation: effects of floodplain-level threats. Wetlands. 2018;38:591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1002-0
  27. Park SH. New illustrations and photographs of naturalized plants of Korea. Seoul: Ilchokak Publishing Co. Ltd.; 2009. (in Korean)
  28. Pier B, Dresser B, Lee J, Boylen C, Nierzwicki-Bauer S. Ecological analysis before and after planting in a constructed wetland in the Adirondacks. Wetlands. 2015;35:611-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0652-4
  29. Rea N, Ganf GG. How emergent plants experience water regime in a Mediterranean-type wetland. Aquat Bot. 1994;49:117-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(94)90033-7
  30. Schlising RA, Sanders EL. Quantitative analysis of vegetation at the Richvale vernal pools, California. Am J Bot. 1982:734-42.
  31. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois press; 1949.
  32. Shi J, Ma K, Wang J, Zhao J, He K. Vascular plant species richness on wetland remnants is determined by both area and habitat heterogeneity. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19:1279-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9757-5
  33. Son D, Lee H, Lee EJ, Cho K-H, Kwon D. Flora and vegetation structure in a 15- year-old artificial wetland. Ecol Resil Infrast. 2015;2:54-63 (in Korean).
  34. Tiner RW. The concept of a hydrophyte for wetland identification. Bioscience. 1991;41:236-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311413
  35. Toivonen H, Lappalainen T. Ecology and production of aquatic macrophytes in the oligotrophic, mesohumic lake Suomunjärvi, eastern Finland. Ann Bot Fennici. 1980;17:69-85.
  36. Van der Valk A. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology. 1981;62: 688-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937737
  37. Vivian-Smith G. Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. J Ecol. 1997;85:71-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960628
  38. Vymazal J. Plants in constructed, restored and created wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2013;61:501-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.035
  39. Weiner SE. Long-term competitive displacement of Typha latifolia by Typha angustifolia in a eutrophic lake. Oecologia. 1993;94:451-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317123
  40. Wiegleb G, Dahms H-U, Byeon W, Choi G. To what extent can constructed wetlands enhance biodiversity? Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2017;8:561-9. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.8.1016
  41. Wilson SD, Keddy PA. Competition, survivorship and growth in macrophyte communities. Freshw Biol. 1991;25:331-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb00495.x