DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantification of Carbon Reduction Effects of Domestic Wood Products for Valuation of Public Benefit

  • Chang, Yoon-Seong (Department of Forest Products, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Sejong (Department of Forest Products, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Mo (Department of Forest Products, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Yeo, Hwanmyeong (Department of Forest Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shim, Kug-Bo (Department of Forest Products, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • Received : 2018.02.07
  • Accepted : 2018.03.20
  • Published : 2018.03.25

Abstract

This study was carried out to quantify degree of contribution of harvested wood product (HWP) on mitigation of climate change by valuation of public benefits, environmentally and economically. The potential carbon dioxide emission reduction of HWP was estimated by accounting carbon storage effect and substitution effect. Based on 2014 statistics of Korea Forest Service, domestic HWPs were sorted by two categories, such as wood products produced domestically from domestic and imported roundwood. The wood products were divided into seven items; sawnwood, plywood, particle board, fiberboard (MDF), paper (including pulp), biomass (wood pellet) and other products. The carbon stock of wood products and substitution effects during manufacturing process was evaluated by items. Based on the relevant carbon emission factor and life cycle analysis, the amount of carbon dioxide emission per unit volume on HWP was quantified. The amounts of carbon stock of HWP produced from domestic and from imported roundwood were 3.8 million $tCO_{2eq}$., and 2.6 million $tCO_{2eq}$., respectively. Also, each reduction of carbon emission by substitution effect of HWP produced from domestic and imported roundwood was 3.1 million $tCO_{2eq}$. and 2.1 million $tCO_{2eq}$., respectively. The results of this study, the amount of carbon emission reduction of HWP, can be effectively used as a basic data for promotion of wood utilization to revise and establish new wood utilization promotion policy such as 'forest carbon offset scheme', and 'carbon storage labeling system of HWP'.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, Y.S., Kim, S.J., Son, W.L., Lee, S.J., Shim, K.B., Yeo, H., Kim, K.M. 2016. Assessment of Carbon Emission for Quantification of Environmental Load on Structural Glued Laminated Timber in Korea. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 44(3): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.3.449
  2. Chang, Y.S., Kim, S.J., Son, W.L., Lee, S.J., Shim, K.B., Yeo, H., Kim, K.M. 2016. Assessment of Carbon Emission for Quantification of Environmental Load on Structural Glued Laminated Timber in Korea. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 44(3): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.3.449
  3. FAO. 2004. Valuation methods for environmental benefits in forestry and watershed investment projects. p.52.
  4. Fuchigami, Y., Hara, K., Kita, T., Uwasu, M., Kurimoto, S. 2016. Analysis of effect on $CO_2$2 emission reduction and cost estimation for the use of Bio-coke: a case study of Osaka, Japan. Journal of Wood Science 62: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-015-1515-6
  5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. 2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol.
  6. Kim, J.H. 1989. Valuation of Nonmarket Forest Resources. Nifos Research Information 29: 1-2.
  7. Kim, J.H., Lee, K.H., Park, C.W., Kim, K.H., Youn, H.J., Son, Y.M., Lee, S.W., Park, C.R., Seo, J.W., Oh, J.S. 2005. Valuation of Nonmarket Forest Resources. Nifos Research Report No.05-07. p.244.
  8. Kim, J.H., Kim, J.J., Jeon, J.H., Son, Y.M., Kim, K.H., Youn, H.J., Park, C.R., Lee, S.W. 2007. Valuation of Nonmarket Forest Resources. Nifos Research Report No.07-07. p.354.
  9. Kim, J,H., Kim, K.D., Kim, R.H., Park, C.R., Youn, H.J., Lee, S.W., Choi, H.T., Kim, J.J. 2010. Valuation of Nonmarket Forest Resources. Nifos Research Report No.10-26. p.205.
  10. Korea Forest Service. 2015. Wood supply record.
  11. Korea Forest Service. 2015. Statistical yearbook of forestry.
  12. Korea Forest Service. 2015. Wood utilization actual condition survey.
  13. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute. 2016. Guideline of Carbon Footprint Labelling Certification.
  14. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute. 2014. Project of Estimation for environmentally friendliness by life cycle inventory database of wood products(I)
  15. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute. 2015. Project of Estimation for environmentally friendliness by life cycle inventory database of wood products(II)
  16. Krieger, D.J. 2001. Economic value of forest system services: A review. p.31.
  17. National Institute of Forest Science. 2016. Notification on Specifications and Quality Standards of Wood Pellets.
  18. Park, D.K. 1996. Development of forest resource account and its use for policy impact analysis: with a special reference to timber, carbon sequestraton, and forest recreation. Doctoral thesis. Seoul National University. Republic of Korea.
  19. Shin, Y.K., Jang, C.S. 2006. A Study of Compensation Structure on Forestry Sector as a Public Good.
  20. Son, W.L., Bang, Y.Y., Kim, S.J. 2016. Evaluation of life cycle inventory of domestic wood products and its environmental impact. Proceeding of 2016 annual meeting of the Korean society of Wood Science and Technology. Seoul, Korea, 15-16 April 2016.
  21. Tonosaki, M. 2009. Harvested wood products accounting in the post Kyoto commitment period. Journal of Wood Science 55: 390-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1052-2
  22. Tsunetsugu, Y., Tonosaki, M. 2010. Quantitative estimation of carbon removal effects due to wood utilization up to 2050 in Japan: effects from carbon storage and substitution of fossil fuels by harvested wood products. Journal of Wood Science 56: 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1107-4
  23. Willis, K.G., Garrod, G., Scarpa, R., Macmillan, D., Bateman, I. 2000. Non-market benefits of forestry (Phase 1), Report to the Forestry Commission, Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom. p.126.
  24. Willis, K.G., Garrod, G., Scarpa, R., Powe, N., Lovett, A., Bateman, I.J., Hanley, N., Macmillan, D.C. 2003. The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain (Phase 2), Report to the Forestry Commission, Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom.