Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Intrapreneurship on the Organizational Performance: Focused on the Mediating Effects of Open Innovation -Focused on small and medium enterprises in Busan-

사내기업가정신이 조직성과에 미치는 영향: 개방형 혁신의 매개효과를 중심으로 -부산지역 중소기업 중심으로-

  • Received : 2018.01.08
  • Accepted : 2018.03.20
  • Published : 2018.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discover the relationship of intrapreneurship, open innovation and organizational performance. For the empirical analysis, data were collected from convenient sample of 310 employees at small and medium enterprises in Busan. All collected data were analyzed using with SPSS 21. The results of this research as followed: firstly, the relationship between the intrapreneurship and the inbound open innovation is positively related. Secondly, there was a partial positive correlation between the inbound open innovation and the organizational performance. Finally, the open innovation played as a partial mediator on the relationship between the intrapreneurship and the organizational performance. Based on these results, researcher suggest the limitations of the study and directions for future studies.

본 연구의 목적은 사내기업가정신, 개방형 혁신 및 조직성과 간의 관계를 살펴보는 데 있다. 실증 분석을 위해 부산의 중소기업 310명의 직원을 대상으로 데이터를 수집 하였다. 수집된 모든 데이터는 SPSS 21을 사용하여 분석되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사내기업가정신과 내향적 개방형 혁신은 긍정적인 관계가 있다. 둘째, 내향적 개방형 혁신과 조직성과 간에 정의 관계가 있다. 셋째, 개방형 혁신은 사내기업가정신과 조직성과 간의 단계에서 부분적인 매개효과를 나타난다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 연구의 한계점과 향후 연구 방향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Zahra, S. A. & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00036-1
  2. Bordean, O., Borza, A., & Maier, V. (2011). The involvement of boards in strategy implementation. Review of International Comparative Management, 12(5), 986-992.
  3. Churchill, N. C. (1992). Research issues in entrepreneurship. The state of the art of entrepreneurship, 579-596.
  4. Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
  5. Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S. & Covin, J. G. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1-2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.005
  6. Duane Ireland, R., Kuratko, D. F. & Morris, M. H. (2006). A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: innovation at all levels: part I. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660610640137
  7. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  8. Lee, H. Y. & Lee, S. W. (2012). Analyzing the Characteristics of Open Innovation Activity and the External Collaboration Network in SMEs. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 15(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2012.15.2.147
  9. Chesbrough, H. & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  10. Linton, J. D. (2012). What's hot and what's not: A summary of topics and papers in technology innovation management that are getting attention..Technovation, 32(12), 653-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.10.002
  11. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39(4), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00561.x
  12. Hung, K. P. & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10-11), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.006
  13. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9630-8
  14. Baruah, B., & Ward, A. (2015). Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 811-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0318-3
  15. Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
  16. Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N
  17. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  18. Rogers, E. M., Medina, U. E., Rivera, M. A. & Wiley, C. J. (2005). Complex adaptive systems and the diffusion of innovations. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 10(3), 1-26.
  19. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 400, 1-19.
  20. Bianchi, M., Croce, A., Dell'Era, C., Di Benedetto, C. A. & Frattini, F. (2016). Organizing for inbound open innovation: how external consultants and a dedicated R&D unit influence product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12302
  21. Schumpeter, J. & Backhaus, U. The theory of economic development.(2003). Springer, Boston, MA.
  22. Hayton, J. C. (2003). Strategic human capital management in SMEs: An empirical study of entrepreneurial performance. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10096
  23. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  24. Oly Ndubisi, N., & Iftikhar, K. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance: Comparing small and medium-size enterprises. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 214-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715201211271429
  25. Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneurship. New York.
  26. Seshadri, D. V. R., & Tripathy, A. (2006). Innovation through intrapreneurship: The road less travelled. Vikalpa, 31(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920060102
  27. Rhee, J. H., & Yang, H. J. (2011). Relationships Among International Entrepreneurship, Core Competence, and Internationalization. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(6), 3247-3271.
  28. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  29. Asakawa, K., Nakamura, H., & Sawada, N. (2010). Firms' open innovation policies, laboratories' external collaborations, and laboratories' R&D performance. R&D Management, 40(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00598.x
  30. Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J. & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687-717. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
  31. Chang, S. D. & Zhu, Y. M. (2012). Corporate Entrepreneurship, Social Capitals, and SMEs' Performance in China. The e-Business Studies, 13(2), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.13.2.201206.283
  32. Hwang, S. K. (2013). The Effects of Corporate Entrepreneurship on Self-Efficacy and Firm Performance in Small and Medium-sized Firms of Gyeongnam Region. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 15(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2013.15.4.345
  33. Lassen, A. H., Gertsen, F. & Riis, J. O. (2006). The nexus of corporate entrepreneurship and radical innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00406.x
  34. Hoque, Z., & James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance. Journal of management accounting research, 12(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.1