DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

관계의 유대지향성 및 자기표현성향이 구전활동에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Relational Intentionality and Self-presentation Tendency on Word-of-mouth Activities

  • 노민정 (경희대학교 경영대학 빅데이터 연구센터) ;
  • 주우진 (서울대학교 경영대학 경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.13
  • 심사 : 2018.03.12
  • 발행 : 2018.03.28

초록

소셜미디어 상에서 소비자로서의 자신을 얼마나 드러낼 것인지의 여부는 자기표현에 따른 긍정적 보상과 부정적 위협 중에서 어느 것에 보다 초점을 맞출지에 따라 달라질 수 있다. 또한 긍정적 보상과 부정적 위협 중에서 어느 것에 보다 초점을 맞추게 될 것인지의 여부는 자신을 드러내고자 하는 관계의 상대방이 누구인지에 따라 달라질 수 있다. 자기표현의 청중을 관계의 유대지향성에 따라 구분한다고 할 때, 직장동료와 같이 업무파트너로서 이해 증진에 목적을 두는 관계 상대방은 도구적 유대지향성의 청중이라고 하는 반면 학창시절 친구와 같이 우정과 같은 감정적 유대를 기반으로 하는 관계 상대방은 표현적 유대지향성의 청중이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 직장동료와의 관계에서처럼 도구적 유대지향성이 강한 상대방에 대해서는 자기표현의 실패로 인한 부정적 위협의 여파가 자기표현의 성공으로 인한 긍정적 보상보다 더욱 치명적일 수 있기 때문에 긍정적 보상보다는 부정적 위협의 예방에 초점을 맞춰 수세적으로 자기표현을 하려 든다고 예측하여 보았다. 실증결과는 페이스북 상에서 직장동료들의 비중이 증가할수록 수세적 자기표현에 의한 매개 효과는 증대되는 데 반면, 쟁취적 자기표현에 의한 매개 효과는 감소하고 있음을 확인시켜 주고 있었다.

The decision to actively reveal oneself as a consumer on social media depends on whether the focus is more on positive rewards than negative threats associated with self-presentation, that is, who the other party is in that relationship. The audience of self-presentation could also be divided into expressive and instrumental ties: work partners can be classified as an audience of instrumental ties, whereas school friends can be regarded as an audience of expressive ties. This study accordingly predicted that people would focus more on prevention of negative threats than positive reward, exhibiting defensive self-presentation in relationships with strong instrumental ties because the fallout from negative threats due to failed self-presentation have a more detrimental effect than a positive reward from successful self-presentation. The empirical findings thereby indicated that as the proportion of coworkers increased among Facebook friends, the mediation effect through defensive self-presentation increased, whereas such effect through acquisitive self-presentation decreased.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. R. M. Arkin, "Self-Presentation Styles," In J. T. Tedeschi (ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York: Academic Press, pp.311-333, 1981.
  2. R. N. Wolfe, R. D. Lennox, and B. L. Cutler, "Getting Along and Getting Ahead: Empirical Support for a Theory of Protective and Acquisitive Self-Presentation," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.50, No.2, pp.356-361, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.356
  3. A. Chernev, "Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.31, No.3, pp.557-565, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1086/425090
  4. R. Chitturi, R. Raghunathan, and V. Mahajan, "Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.44, No.4, pp.702-714, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.4.702
  5. T. J. Brown, T. E. Barry, P. A. Dacin, and R. F. Gunst, "Spreading the Word: Investigating Antecedents of Consumers' Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.33, No.2, pp.123-138, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304268417
  6. L. F. Feick and L. L. Price, "The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information," Journal of Marketing, Vol.51, No.1, pp.83-97, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251146
  7. T. Hennig-Thurau, K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D. D. Gremler, "Electronic Word of‐Mouth via Consumer‐Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?" Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.18, No.1, pp.38-52, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  8. C. Saenger, V. L. Thomas, and J. W. Johnson, "Consumption‐Focused Self‐Expression Word of Mouth: A New Scale and Its Role in Consumer Research," Psychology & Marketing, Vol.30, No.11, pp.959-970, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20659
  9. A. C. Ahuvia, "Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.32, No.1, pp.171-184, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1086/429607
  10. L. R. Flynn, R. E. Goldsmith, and J. K. Eastman, "Opinion Leaders and Opinion Seekers: Two New Measurement Scales," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.24, No.2, pp.137-147, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396242004
  11. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, "The 'What' and 'Why' of Goal Pursuit: Human Needs and the Self Determination Theory of Behavior," Psychology Inquiry, Vol.11, No.4, pp.227-268, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  12. 진보래, 노현주, "페이스북 친구들의 반응과 관계적 유용성: 자기노출 성향의 영향력과 성별의 조절효과," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제15권, 제7호, pp.449-459, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.07.449
  13. A. Nadkarni and S. G. Hofmann, "Why Do People Use Facebook?," Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.52, No.3, pp.243-249, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
  14. A. Barasch and J. Berger, "Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.51, No.3, pp.286-299, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0238
  15. R. F. Baumeister, D. M. Tice, and D. G. Hutton, "Self-Presentational Motivations and Personality Differences in Self-Esteem," Journal of Personality, Vol.57, No.3, pp.547-579, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x
  16. M. R. Leary and A. B. Allen, "Personality and Persona: Personality Processes in Self-Presentation," Journal of Personality, Vol.79, No.6, 1191-1218, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00704.x
  17. 박남수, 백강희, "페이스북 이용자의 자기노출, 페이스북 이용강도, 프라이버시 인식과 프라이버시 관리 능력이 페이스북 지속적 이용의향에 미치는 영향: 프라이버시 관리 능력의 조절효과를 중심으로," 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제16권, 제11호, pp.53-62, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.11.053
  18. S. Atkinson, "Senior Management Relationships and Trust: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.19, No.6, pp.571-587, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551499
  19. C. P. Lin, "To Share or Not To Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.70, No.4, pp.411-428, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0
  20. A. H. Maslow, "A Theory of Human Motivation," Psychological Review, Vol.50, No.4, pp.370-396, 1943. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  21. K. M. Sheldon and J. C. Hilpert, "The Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) Scale: An Alternative Domain General Measure of Need Satisfaction," Motivation and Emotion, Vol.36, No.4, pp.439-451, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
  22. N. Bozionelos, "Intra-Organizational Network Resources: Relation to Career Success and Personality," International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol.11, No.1, pp.41-66, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028962
  23. A. F. Hayes, "PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling" [White paper], Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf, 2012.
  24. T. Jackson, "Protective Self-Presentation, Sources of Socialization, and Loneliness among Australian Adolescents and Young Adults," Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.43, No.6, pp.1552-1562, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.012