DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Non-Cooperative Game Joint Hidden Markov Model for Spectrum Allocation in Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Jiao, Yan (Dept. of Computer Software, Dong Seoul University)
  • Received : 2018.01.23
  • Accepted : 2018.02.23
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

Spectrum allocation is a key operation in cognitive radio networks (CRNs), where secondary users (SUs) are usually selfish - to achieve itself utility maximization. In view of this context, much prior lit literature proposed spectrum allocation base on non-cooperative game models. However, the most of them proposed non-cooperative game models based on complete information of CRNs. In practical, primary users (PUs) in a dynamic wireless environment with noise uncertainty, shadowing, and fading is difficult to attain a complete information about them. In this paper, we propose a non-cooperative game joint hidden markov model scheme for spectrum allocation in CRNs. Firstly, we propose a new hidden markov model for SUs to predict the sensing results of competitors. Then, we introduce the proposed hidden markov model into the non-cooperative game. That is, it predicts the sensing results of competitors before the non-cooperative game. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme improves the energy efficiency of networks and utilization of SUs.

Keywords

References

  1. I. Akyildiz et al, "Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A Survey," Computer networks, vol.50, no. 13, pp.2127-2159, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001
  2. W. Ahmed et al, Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Network, cdn. Intechopen. com, 2012
  3. L. S. Ronga et al, "S-Modular Games for Distributed Power Allocation in Cognitive Radio System," Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on, Tokyo, pp.13-16, Sep. 2009
  4. S.K. Jayaweera et al, "Dynamic Spectrum Leasing in Cognitive Radio Networks via Primary-Secondary User Power Control Games," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3300-3310, Jun. 2009
  5. J. Elias et al, "Non-cooperative spectrum access in cognitive radio networks: a game theoretical model," Computer Networks, vol. 55, no.17, pp. 3832-3846, Dec. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.07.022
  6. L.C. Cremene et al, "Analysis of cognitive raido scenes based on non-cooperative game theoretical modeling," IET Communications, vol.6, no.13, pp.1876-1883, Sep. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2011.0712
  7. N.D. Duong et al, "Non-cooperative power control and spectrum allocation in cognitive radio networks: a game theoretic perspective," Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 516-525, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.2202
  8. J.H. Wang et al, "On imperfect pricing in globally constrained noncooperative games for cognitive radio networks," Signal Processing, vol.117, pp. 96-101, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.04.010
  9. S.h. Huang et al, "Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks," The 27th Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2008), 13-18 April, 2008
  10. V.K. Tumuluru, and P. Wang et al, "Channel status prediction for cognitive radio networks," Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing, www.Interscience.wiley.com DOI: 10.1002/wcm, 2010
  11. T Nguyeny et al, "Hidden Markov process based dynamic spectrum assess for cognitive radio," Information Science and Systems (CISS), the 45th Annual Conference on, Baltimore MD, March, 2011, pp.1-6,
  12. X.h Xing et al, "Spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks," IEEE Wireless Communication. vol.20, no.2, pp. 90-96, April. 2013 https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2013.6507399
  13. P. P Roy and M. Muralidhar, "Hidden Markov Model based Channel state prediction in Cognitive Radio Networks," International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 4, no.2, Feb. 2015
  14. M. Maskery et al., "Decentralized Dynamic Spectrum Access for Cognitive Radios: Cooperative Design of a non-cooperative Game," IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 57, No.2, Feb. 2009, pp.459-469. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2009.02.070158