Smart Structures and Systems

  • 제21권3호
  • /
  • Pages.373-387
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-1584(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-1991(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Semi-active leverage-type isolation system considering minimum structural energy

  • Lin, Tzu-Kang (Department of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University) ;
  • Lu, Lyan-Ywan (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University) ;
  • Chen, Chi-Jen (Department of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.12
  • 심사 : 2018.02.16
  • 발행 : 2018.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Semi-active isolation systems based on leverage-type stiffness control strategies have been widely studied. The main concept behind this type of system is to adjust the stiffness in the isolator to match the fundamental period of the isolated system by using a simple leverage mechanism. Although this system achieves high performance under far-field earthquakes, it is unsuitable for near-fault strong ground motion. To overcome this problem, this study considers the potential energy effect in the control law of the semi-active isolation system. The minimal energy weighting (MEW) between the potential energy and kinetic energy was first optimized through a series of numerical simulations. Two MEW algorithms, namely generic and near-fault MEW control, were then developed to efficiently reduce the structural displacement responses. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed method, a two-degree-of-freedom structure was employed as a benchmark. Numerical results indicate that the dynamic response of the structure can be effectively dampened by the proposed MEW control under both far-field and near-fault earthquakes, whereas the structural responses resulting from conventional control methods may be greater than those for the purely passive control method. Moreover, according to experimental verifications, both the generic and near-fault MEW control modes yielded promising results under impulse-like earthquakes. The practicability of the proposed control algorithm was verified.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anusonti-Inthra, F.G.P. (2003), "Adaptive control of semiactive variable stiffness devices for narrow-band disturbance rejection", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 14.
  2. Battista, R.C., Carvalhob, E.M.L. and de Almeida Souza, R. (2008), "Hybrid fluid-dynamic control devices to attenuate slender structures oscillations", Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3513-3522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.022
  3. Chung, L.L., Reinhorn, A.M. and Soong, T.T. (1988), "Experiments on active control of seismic structures", J. Eng. Mech., 114(2).
  4. De la Cruz, S.T., Lopez-Almansa, F. and Oller, S. (2007), "Numerical simulation of the seismic behavior of building structures equipped with friction energy dissipators", Comput Struct, 85(1-2), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.050
  5. Du, H., Li, W. and Zhang, N. (2011), "Semi-active variable stiffness vibration control of vehicle seat suspension using an MR elastomer isolator", Smart Mater. Struct., 20(10), 105003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105003
  6. Lin, P.Y., Roschke, P.N. and Loh, C.H. (2007), "Hybrid controlled base-isolation with magneto-rhgeological damper and fuzzy control", Struct. Control Health Monit., 14(3), 384-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.163
  7. Lu, L.Y., Chu, S.Y., Yeh, S.W. and Chung, L.L. (2012), "Seismic test of least-input-energy control with ground velocity feedback for variable-stiffness isolation systems", J. Sound Vib., 331(4), 767-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.012
  8. Lu, L.Y., Chu, S.Y., Yeh, S.W. and Peng, C.H. (2011), "Modeling and experimental verification of a variable-stiffness isolation system using leverage mechanism", J. Vib. Control, 17(12), 1869-1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546310395976
  9. Lu, L.Y. and Lin, G.L. (2009), "Improvement of near-fault seismic isolation using a resettable variable stiffness damper", Eng. Struct., 31(9), 2097-2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.011
  10. Martinez Rueda, J.E., (2002), "On the evolution of energy dissipation devices for seismic design", Earthq Spectra, 18(2), 309-346. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1494434
  11. Naeim, F. and Kelly, J.M. (1999), Design of Seismic Isolated Structures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
  12. Narasimhan, S. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2005), "A STFT semiactive controller for base isolated buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems", Eng. Struct., 27(4), 514-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.010
  13. Nagarajaiah, S and Sahasrabudhe, S. (2006), "Seismic response control of smart sliding isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: an experimental and numerical study", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 35(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.514
  14. Shariatmadar, H. and Razavi, H.M. (2014), "Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(4), 547-564. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.4.547
  15. Tamura, Y., Fujii, K., Ohtsuki, T., Wakahara, T. and Kohsaka, R. (1995), "Effectiveness of tuned liquid dampers under wind excitation", Eng. Struct., 17(9), 609-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00031-2
  16. Tsai, C., Chen, H.W., Hong, C.P. and Su, Y.F. (1993), "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction", Earthq. Spectra, 9(3), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727
  17. Yang, J.N., Kim, J. and Agrawal, A. (2000), "Resetting semi-active stiffness damper for seismic response control", J. Struct. Eng., 26, 1427-1433.
  18. Zhang, X.Z., Cheng, F.Y., Jiang, H.P. (2006), "Hybrid actuator-damper-bracing control (HDABC) system with intelligent strategy and soil-structure interaction", Eng. Struct., 28(4), 2010-2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.030
  19. Zhou, N. and Liu, K. (2010), "A tunable high-static-low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator", J. Sound Vib., 329(9), 1254-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.11.001