대한화학회지 (Journal of the Korean Chemical Society)

  • 제62권2호
  • /
  • Pages.137-147
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1017-2548(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-8530(eISSN)
대한화학회 (Korean Chemical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학 관련 사회적 쟁점(Socio-Scientific Issues, SSI)을 활용한 국내 프로그램 분석

Analysis of Socio-Scientific Issues(SSI) Programs in Korea

  • 박현주 (조선대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 김나형 (조선대학교 화학교육과)
  • Park, HyunJu (Department of Chemistry Education, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Nahyung (Department of Chemistry Education, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.08
  • 심사 : 2018.01.17
  • 발행 : 2018.04.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 과학 관련 사회적 쟁점(Socio-Scientific Issues, SSI)의 국내 프로그램 123개를 SSI 준거틀에 따라 분석하였다. 준거틀은 프로그램의 주제, 학교급, 도입, 과학적 증거, 사회적 내용, 과학적 지식의 사용, 갈등 수준, 평가와 성찰 등으로 구성된다. 분석한 결과에 따른 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 우리나라 SSI 프로그램은 초등학교급 프로그램이 가장 많았고, 중학교급 프로그램이 상대적으로 적게 나타났다. 둘째, SSI 프로그램의 도입은 실제 상황과 픽션과 논픽션 상황이 주된 것으로 나타났고, 논쟁과 갈등이 포함된 상황은 10% 미만으로 나타났다. 셋째, SSI 프로그램은 과학적 증거에 기반하지만 개인의 가치, 인식 등에 따라 영향을 받는 내용이 주로 나타났다. 넷째, SSI 프로그램의 사회적 내용은 윤리/도덕/가치, 정치/사회생활/경제, 환경 내용이 주로 개발되었다. 다섯째, SSI 프로그램에서 과학적 지식의 사용은 과학적 의사결정, 과학적 비판적 사고, 정보 탐색이 주로 나타났다. 그러나 과학 탐구, 위험평가, 비용 효과는 10% 미만으로 나타났다. 과학적 탐구는 과학교육의 핵심이며, 과학과 교육과정의 핵심역량이다. SSI 교육을 통해 학생들의 다양한 이해당사자의 관점을 경험하고, 평가하고, 반성하는 학습 경험을 제공해야 한다.

The purpose of this study was to analysis total number of 123 SSI programs by SSI criteria. The criteria was consisted of subject, school level, starting point, scientific evidence, social content, use of scientific knowledge, level of conflict of interest, and evaluation and reflection. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, elementary school programs were the most and middle school programs were relatively few. Second, starting point was mainly in the actual situation, the fiction and nonfiction situation, and the situation including the controversy and conflict was less than 10%. Third, it was based on scientific evidence but mainly influenced by individual values and perceptions. Fourth, social contents were developed mainly in ethics/morality/value, political/social life/economy, environment contents. Fifth, the use of scientific knowledge mainly consisted of scientific decision making, scientific critical thinking, and information search. However, science inquiry, risk assessment, and cost effectiveness were less than 10%. Scientific inquiry is the essential factor of science education, and one of core competencies of national science curriculum. SSI program should be able to experience various kinds of conflicts, and to evaluate and reflect through reflection.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Shim, M. Y.; Cho, H. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2009, 29, 513.
  2. Pak, U. J. Journal of the Korea Bioethics Association 2015, 16, 1.
  3. Ryu, S. ChemWorld 2017, 3, 55.
  4. Park, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2016, 36, 413. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0413
  5. NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States; National Academics Press: 2013.
  6. Ryu, S; Sandoval, W. A. Science Education 2012, 96, 488. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21006
  7. Zeidler, D. L.; Sadler, T. D.; Simmons, N. L.; Howes, E. V. Science Education 2005, 89, 357. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
  8. Park, H. J.; Baek, Y.; Sim, J. Developing Teaching-Learning Program for Socio-Scientific Issues; Project Report, Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity, 2016.
  9. Zeidler, D. L.; Nichols, B. H. Journal of Elementary Science Education 2009, 21, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
  10. Zeidler, D. L. Socioscientific Issues as a Curriculum Emphasis: Theory, Research and Practice. In Handbook of Research on Science Education; Lederman N. G., Abell S. K. eds.; Routledge: New York, 2014; pp 697-726.
  11. Zeidler, D. L. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Netherlands, 2003.
  12. Aikenhead, G. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1984, 21, 167. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210208
  13. Flower, S. R.; Zeidler, D. L.; Sadler, T. D. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31, 279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
  14. Sadler, T. D. Studies in Science Education 2009, 45, 1.
  15. Zeidler, D. L.; Walker, K. A.; Ackett, W. A.; Simons, M. L. Science Education 2002, 86, 343. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
  16. Lee, H. J.; Chang, H. S. Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation 2008, 10, 189.
  17. Lee, H. O. Construction of Nature of Technology Framework and Its Utilization for Investigation of Changes in College Students' Perception of Nature of Technology Through SSI-based Program. Ph.D. Thesis, Ewha Womans University, Korea, 2015.
  18. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (Notification No. 2009-41); Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology: Seoul, 2010.
  19. Millar, R.; Osborne, J. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future; King's College London School of Education: London, 1998.
  20. Ministry of Education. 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. (No. 2015-74); 2009.
  21. Ministry of Education and Science Technology. 2009 Revised National Science Curriculum. (2009-14); Ministry of Education and Science Technology: 2009.
  22. Berkowitz, M. W.; Simmons, P. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2003.
  23. Sadler, T. D.; Barab, S. A.; Scott, B. Research in Science Education 2007, 37, 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
  24. Ekborg, M.; Ideland, M.; Malmberg, C. NorDiNa 2009, 5, 35.
  25. Yang, J.; Kim, H.; Gao, L.; Kim, E.; Kim, S.; Lee, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2012, 1, 113.
  26. Mitchener, C. P.; Anderson, R. D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1989, 26, 351. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260407
  27. Lee, H. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2016, 36, 539. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539
  28. Lee, H. J.; Chang, H. S. Journal of Korean Association in Science Education 2010, 30, 353.
  29. Yoo, J. S.; Choi, S. Y.; Lee, H. J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2011, 15, 415.
  30. Yang, J. E.; Kim, H. J.; Gao, L.; Kim, E. J.; Kim, S. W.; Lee, H. J. Journal of Korean Association in Science Education 2012, 32, 113. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.113
  31. Ekborg, M.; Ottander, C. Science in Social Contexts (www.sisc.se) 2013.
  32. Lee, H. J.; Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Choi, K. H. Canadian Jo 6, 97.
  33. Lee, H. J.; Witz, K. Journal of Science Education 2009, 31, 931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903
  34. Sadler, T. D.; Murakami, C. D. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educacao em Ciencias 2014, 14, 2.
  35. Choi, K. H.; Cho, H. H. Journal of Korean Association in Science Education 2003, 23, 131.
  36. Ratcliffe, M.; Grace, M. Teaching Socio-scientific Issues; Open University Press: Maidenhead, 2003.
  37. Yakob, N.; Yunus, H. M.; May, C. Y. US-China Education Review 2015, 5, 634.
  38. Ottander, C.; Ottander, K. Teachers' Design of Socio-scientific Inquiry Based Teaching and Learning Sessions. Proceeding of the ESERA 2017 Conference, Irlend, 2017.
  39. Greer, K.; Glaze, A. Socio-scientific Argumentation as a Driver for Science Learning. New Perspectives in Science Education; Conference Proceedings, 5th Eds.; PIXEL: 2016.
  40. Bruguiere, C.; Tiberghien, A.; Clement, P. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions; Springer: 2014.
  41. Ekbord, M. Ekborg, M. Journal of Biological Education, 2008, 42, 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2008.9656112
  42. Elam, M.; Bertilsson, M. European Journal of Social Theory 2003, 6, 233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431003006002005
  43. Nowotny, H.; Scott, P.; Gibbons, M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty; Polity Press: Cambridge, 2002.
  44. Mogensen, F.; Mayer, M. A Comparative Study on Ecoschool Development Process; ENSI/SEED: Wien, 2005.
  45. Zeidler, D. L.; Kahn, S. It's Debatable!: Using Socioscientific Issues to Develop Scientific Literacy K-12; National Science Teachers Association Press: Arlington, VA, 2014.
  46. Weizman, A.; Shwartz, Y.; Fortus, D.; Krajcik, J. Developing the Practice of Scientitic Modeling through Classroom Discussion. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference, Baltimore, 2008.
  47. Scott, A.; Zeidler, D. L.; Chiodo, K. L. Using Socioscientific Issues as Contexts for Teaching Concepts and Content. Exemplary Science for Resolving Societal Challenges; National Science Teachers Association Press: VA, 2010.
  48. Song, I. Liberal Education 2015, 9, 265.
  49. Dilon, J.; Scott, W. International Journal of Science Education 2002, 24, 1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210137737
  50. Lindahl, B. R.; Ekborg, M. I.; Ottander, C. S. US-China Education Review 2011, 342.
  51. Gough, S. Environmental Education Research 2002, 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120109664
  52. Texley, J; Wild, A. NSTA Pathways to the Science Standards, High School Edition; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 1996.
  53. Klosterman, M. L.; Sadler, T. D. Research in Science Education 2011, 42, 51.
  54. Kolsto, S. D. Science Education 2001, 85, 291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
  55. Ham, E. H.; Jang, H.; Shin, T. S. Korean Journal of Educational Research 2015, 53, 305.

피인용 문헌

  1. 도둑게의 유생털이를 위한 이동 특성을 활용한 해양 환경교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용 vol.32, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2019.32.2.222