로지스틱회귀분석을 이용한 등산로 훼손요인 분석: 고루포기산~생계령 대상으로

Analysis of Factors Affecting Hiking Trails by Logistic Regression Analysis: Focus on Golupogisan~Saenggyelyeong

Abstract

본 연구에서는 백두대간 등산로 훼손에 영향을 미치는 자연환경요인을 선정하고 영향 관계를 분석하였다. 연구대상지는 백두대간 고루포기산~생계령 구간 내 표본지 총 123개소이며 등산로 훼손, 임상, 하층식생, 수관밀도와 FGIS를 통해 얻은 경사, 토성, 암석노출 총 7가지 정보를 분석에 활용하였다. 등산로 훼손 발생지 43곳과 미발생지 80곳을 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 분석한 결과, 등산로 훼손에 영향을 미치는 자연환경요인으로 경사도, 하층식생, 토성, 암석노출 총 4가지를 선정하였다. 경사도와 하층식생은 양의 상관관계를 보였고 암석노출은 음의 상관관계로 나타났다. 토성은 미사 비율이 낮고 모래 비율이 높은 토성일수록 양의 상관관계를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 등산로 훼손을 줄이기 위해서는 경사도, 하층식생, 토성, 암석노출 4가지 자연환경요인들을 적절하게 관리하여야 한다.

The study was carried out to select natural environmental factors that affect damage to hiking paths and to provide directions for facility management of hiking paths by a logistic regression analysis. The study sites is a total of 123 sample sites that located in the Baekdudaegan Guropo-Gisaengnyeong hiking trails. The variables used in the analysis model included mountain trail damage, forest type, herb of soil and crown density obtained through a field survey and included slope, soil and rock exposure obtained through FGIS. A logistic regression analysis of 43 sites and 80 undeveloped sites, 4 elements were selected for slope, herb of soil, soil and rock exposure. The slope and the herb of soil were positively correlated and the exposure of rock was negative. Soil has shown a positive correlation with its low missile and high sand ratio Saturn. Therefore, the management of the mountain hiking paths facilities should be established and restored considering the slope, herb of soil, soil and rock exposure.

Figure 1. Map showing the investigated line Golupogisan~Saenggyelyeong.

Figure 2. Independent variable selection procedures.

Figure 3. Evaluation criteria picture of hiking trail damage (Occurrence, Not Occurrence).

Figure 4. Herb of soil Evaluation standards(A lot, Some, Any).

Table 1. Code of Hiking Trail Damage and Evaluation Criteria.

Table 2. The Construction of Environmental Factors Data.

Table 3. A Classified Table.

Table 4. Logistic Regression Coefficient of Significance Test.