DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전문가 인식조사를 통한 녹색건축물 교육 실태분석과 개선방안 연구

The Current Status Analysis and Improvement of Green Building Education through Expert Survey

  • 투고 : 2017.10.16
  • 심사 : 2017.12.21
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the current condition of green building education, which is a necessary condition to activate green architecture, with the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the building sector. The main results are as follows. First, the level of education and the level of domestic green architecture were generally underestimated. Second, in order to increase the satisfaction of participants in green building education, it is necessary to increase the number of courses and to increase the number of lecturers who have excellent practical skills. Third, there is a need to strengthen green building programs related to BEMS and green remodeling. Fourth, it is necessary to expand the education on green architecture for the people in the architectural planning and design field and the related field officials. Fifth, green building education needs to be implemented in conjunction with curriculum of elementary, middle and high school. Sixth, it is necessary to diversify the PR(public relations) channels of the green building education program and to provide a way to give the employment increase point when the curriculum is completed. Seventh, there is a need to expand administrative and financial incentives for green architecture in order to revitalize green architecture education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, Y. & Kwon, H. (2008). The Attitude of Construction Students toward Sustainability in the Built Environment, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(3), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2008.11.3.70
  2. AURI (Architecture & Urban Research Institute). (2015). 2015 Architecture & Urban Research Review. 20.
  3. Cho, S. & Kim, Y. (2013). Compiling and Analyzing GHGs Emission Statistics in Building Sector for Green Building Policy, Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 3.
  4. Eom, J. & Chung, D. (2013). Analysis of Contents & Hands-on Activity Tasks for Eco-Construction Technology of 'Construction Technology and Environment' Unit in Middle School Technology Subject, THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 13(3), 70-89.
  5. Hankyoreh Newspaper. (2016). South Korea Becomes 'World's Four Most Negligent Climate Change Countries', 6th November 2016, http://www.hani.co.kr, accessed 7th July 2017.
  6. Kim, H. & Lee, K. (2014). Development of an Eco-Friendly House Construction Hand -on Activity Task for Technology Education of Middle Schools, THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 14(3), 105-124.
  7. Kim, K. (2017). Smart Housing plus Zero Energy Architecture, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 23th January 2017, http://www.molit.go.kr, accessed 5th July 2017.
  8. KOSTAT (Korea National Statistical Office). (2016), Results of construction industry survey as of 2015, 23th December 2016, http://kostat.go.kr, accessed 14th July 2017.
  9. Lee, S. & Lee, S. (2014). A Study on the Development of G-SEED Accredited Professional System, The journal of educational environment research, 13(1), 32-40.
  10. Lee, W., Park E., Kim, D., Kwak, R. & Kim, J. (2007). Study on the role of simulation for education in sustainable building design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 27(1), 749-752.
  11. OPM (Office for Government Policy Coordination, Prime Minister's Secretariat). (2016). Climate Change Response Basic Plan Press Release. 6th December 2016.
  12. Slownews. (2017). Coal addiction Korea, 'dangerous' OECD 5th anniversary, 21st March 2017, http://slownews.kr, accessed 7th July 2017.