Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Integration of Objects and Environment in the Surface with Changing Materiality of Prada Aoyama Epicenter

프라다 아오야마 에피센터 건축에서 나타나는 환경과 사물과 통합되는 다층적 물질성의 표면에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.08.18
  • Accepted : 2018.01.02
  • Published : 2018.02.28
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze integration of the surface of Prada Aoyama Epicenter by Herzog & de Meuron. To understand various aspects of surfaces & constituents related, each elevations are analyzed minutely by distance both inside and outside. The results of this study were as follows; the individual surface of Prada Aoyama Epicenter sets a multi-layered relationship with the actual environment. Their architectural surface still has a significance in presenting a way of creating a building along with everyday surroundings.

Keywords

References

  1. Vidler, A. (1999). The Architectural Uncanny, The MIT Press, 221, 219.
  2. Chung, MY. (2005). Architecture as Re - Presentation of Corporeality - From G. Semper's Bekleidung to Herzog & de Meuron's Surface -, Journal of Architectural History, Vol. 41(1), 107-122.
  3. Sudjic, D. (2003). Commerce and Culture, Domus, Vol. No. 861, 44-61.
  4. Herzog, J. & De Meuron, P. (2002). El Croquis, 109/110, 9.
  5. Herzog, J. & De Meuron, P. (2003). Prada Aoyama Tokyo, Fondazione Prada, 17-18.
  6. Herzog, J. (1998). Kopie, J. (Ed.). Art and Architecture, Chinati Foundation, 39.
  7. Frampton, K. (2007). Song, M. (2017). Modern Architecture: A Critical History(4th ed.), Mati, 303, 445, 446.
  8. Lee, B. & Choi, I. (2009). A Study on the visual Presentation in Works of Herzog & de Meuron -focus on the anti-transparency of glass-, JRAAIK, Vol.11(3), 1-8.
  9. Lim, S. (2014). On Tactile Sense and Depth in Sapce - focused on Herzog & De Meuron's Architecture -, JAIK, Vol. 30(2), 187-194.
  10. Park, M. (2017). Place-forming of minimal object through expanded presentness, Seoul National University Graduate school, 105, 106, 123.
  11. De Meuron, P. & Herzog, J. (2005). Ursprung, P. (Ed.). Herzog & De Meuron: Natural History, Lars Muller Publishers, 19-20, 83, 364.
  12. Moneo, R. (2004). Lee, Y., Jung, T., Lee, S. & Lim, G. (2008). Theoretical Anxiety and Design Strategies in the Work of Eight Contemporary Architects, Space, 450.
  13. Krauss, R. (1981). Yoon, N. (1997). Passages in modern sculpture, Yekyoung, 6.
  14. Krauss, R. (1999). Bachelors, MIT Press, 82.
  15. Jung, S. (2010). A Study on the Modem Architecture in Connection of Skin and Inside Space -Focused on Projects of Herzog & de Meuron-, Journal of Basic Design & Art, Vol.11(6), 529-535.
  16. Park, W. (2007). A Critique of Ocularcentric Architecture and the Opacity of the Space, Philosophy, Vol.18(4), 61.