디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.179-188
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fuzzy-AHP를 활용한 벌크화물 하역 안전요인 분석에 관한 연구 : 철재화물을 중심으로

A Study on the Safety Factor Analysis of Bulk Cargo Handling Using Fuzzy-AHP : Focused on steel cargo

  • 김병화 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 박성훈 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 공정민 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원) ;
  • 여기태 (인천대학교 동북아 물류대학원)
  • Kim, Byung-Hwa (Incheon National University, Graduate school of Logistics) ;
  • Park, Sung-hoon (Incheon National University, Graduate school of Logistics) ;
  • Gong, Jeong-min (Incheon National University, Graduate school of Logistics) ;
  • Yeo, Gi-Tae (Incheon National University, Graduate school of Logistics)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.04
  • 심사 : 2018.02.20
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

철재화물의 항만하역 작업 시 재해비율은 26.3%이며, 이는 취급하는 화물 중 재해발생 비율이 가장 높은 화물인 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 측면에서 철재화물 하역 시 발생할 수 있는 사 고 요인을 분석하고, 요인 간의 중요도 우선순위를 도출하고자 한다. 요인도출을 위해 선행연구 및 경력전문가와 In-depth Interview를 실시하여 요인을 도출하고 Fuzzy-AHP를 이용해 안전요인의 우선순위를 도출하였다. 인적요인, 장비 및 설비, 안전교육, 기업환경 등 4개 상위 요인과 각각 4개의 세부요인을 통해 분석을 실시했다. 상위요인 분석결과에서는 인적요인, 안전교육, 장비 및 설비, 기업환경 순으로 가중치 순위가 나타났다. 세부요인의 요인별 우선순위는 작업자의 안전의식(0.728), 화종에 따른 적정 장비투입(0.345), 작업안전훈련(0.304)순으로 나타났다. 본 논문은 요인 간 상대적 중요도를 도출함으로 현장 작업자 및 기업의 안전의식 제고와 항만하역사고의 재해발생률을 감소하는데 기여가 있다. 향후 컨테이너화물 등 여타 재해비율이 높은 화물들을 대상으로 한 추가연구 및 집단을 구분한 연구가 필요하다.

In this paper, we analyze accident factors that occur in the unloading of steel cargoes and try to derive priority of importance among factors. The Fuzzy-AHP, which enables hierarchical analysis through pairwise comparison of factors, is used to derive priorities of safety factors to consider when unloading steel cargo. In the top factor analysis results, weights were ranked in order of human factors, safety education, equipment and facilities, and business environment. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the improvement of the safety consciousness of the field workers and enterprises and to reduce the incidence of accidents in the unloading and unloading operations by deriving the relative importance between the factors. In the future, it is necessary to study the cargoes of other disasters such as container cargo as well as steel cargo.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Statistics Korea. (2017). Trade dependence. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_2KAA806&conn_path=I2
  2. G. T. Yeo. (2013). Marine Transportation, Seoul : Dunam.
  3. Korea Port Logistics Association. (2016). Statistics and case examples of harbor cargo handling disaster. Seoul. http://www.kopla.or.kr
  4. Y. W. Nam, & C. H. Lee. (2004). A Study on Analysis of Cargo Handling Disaster In Incheon Port. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 6(3), 1-14.
  5. Kim, D. J. (2016). A risk analysis of accidents for improving port logistics productivity - A case study of a container operator of a port -, Productivity review, 30(4), 53-79.
  6. Yeun, D. H., Choi, Y. S., & Kim, .S. G. (2014). An Assesment & Analysis of Risk Based on Accident Category for Container Terminals, The Journal of shipping and logistics, 84, 843-858.
  7. Park, Y. W., & Mok, J. Y. (2001). Safety Problems Occurring in Each process of Unloading Port Operation, Research report, 12, 1-171.
  8. Yoon, C. S., & H. S. Song. (2013). A study on the a Bill for Safety Management of Freight in Port", Dankook Law Review, 37(2), 419-440. https://doi.org/10.17252/dlr.2013.37.2.017
  9. Park, Y. W., & Mok., J. Y. (2002). Improvement of work environment management in unloading of port, Research report, 2002(12), 1-155.
  10. Lee, W. H. (2016). A Study on Improvement of Cargo Handling Safety Management using AHP. Master's thesis. Korea Maritime University Graduate School, Busan.
  11. Hsu, W. K. K., Huang, S. H. S., & Yeh, R. F. J. (2015). An assessment model of safety factors for product tankers in coastal shipping, Safety Science, 76, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.022
  12. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  13. Yoo, S. J., Cha, Y. D., & Yeo, G. T. (2017). A Study on the Success Factors of Port Operation for New International Passenger Terminal Using Fuzzy Theory. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(11), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.11.91
  14. Sim, W. I., & Lee, S. Y. (2014). Customized Coupon Recommendation Model based on Fuzzy AHP Reflecting User Preference. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.395
  15. Kim, B. H., Cha, Y. D., Ma, H. M., & Yeo, G. T. (2017). A Study on Operation factors the Used automobile logistics complex using Fuzzy-AHP, The Journal of Digital convergence, 15(7). 97-109. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.1.97
  16. Joun, H. S., & Lee, S. Y. (2016). Fuzzy-AHP-Based Technology Evaluation Model for venture firms, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(7), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.363
  17. Lee, C. S., Yoon, J. W., Chun, J. H., & Lee, S. J. (2017) A Study on the Prioritization of Medical Device using Fuzzy-AHP", Management & Information Systems Review, 36(1), 147-179.
  18. Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Jornal of Perational Research, 95(1996), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  19. Hetherington, C., Flin, R., & Mearns, K. (2006). Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of safety research, 37(4), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007