The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Innovative Culture and Participation on Firm Performance and Turnover Intention

혁신적 조직문화와 참여가 성과와 이직의도에 미치는 효과

  • Kim, Jinhee (Business School, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 김진희 (대구가톨릭대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2017.12.02
  • Accepted : 2018.02.05
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between innovative culture, participation of employee, turnover intention and organizational performance. Data were extracted from the Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training(KRIVET)'s human capital corporate panel survey(HCCP) from 2015, and the analysis used 411 companies. To test the research model, structural equation model employed. The model shows that innovative culture was positively related to participation, organizational performance. And turnover intention was a negatively related to innovative culture, participation, organizational performance.

본 논문은 조직의 혁신적 조직문화가 종업원 참여와 이직의도에 대해 미치는 효과와 최종적으로 조직성과에 미치는 효과에 대해 분석하였다. 분석을 위한 자료는 한국직업능력개발원의 인적자본패널에 대한 6차년도(2015년) 조사로 수집된 411개 기업에 대한 자료를 활용하였다. 연구모형의 분석에는 구조방정식분석을 활용하였으며, 분석결과 혁신문화는 조직 내 종업원의 참여를 높이고 이직의도는 낮추는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 혁신문화는 조직성과에도 긍정적인 효과를 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 마지막으로 종업원 참여의 수준이 높을수록 종업원의 이직의도는 줄어들며, 이직의도가 높아지면 조직차원의 성과에도 부정적인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheng, W. & Hahm, S. (2017). Cultural Approach for Future Plan Orientation: Chinese Students Study Abroad, International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 5(4), 38-43.
  2. Kim, J. (2007). The Relationship between Organizational Culture, Organizational Commitment and Performance: An Examination of Public Employment Service, Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 7(2), 103-134.
  3. Ravasi, D. & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture, Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433-458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794663
  4. Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture, Academy of Management Journal, 49(2). 395-406. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786086
  5. Quinn, R. E. & Kimberly, L. R. (1984). Paradox, Planning, and Perseverance: Guidelines for Managerial Practice. Kimberly, J. R. & Quinn, R. (eds). Managing Organizational Transitions. pp. 295-313. Dow Jones-Irwin.
  6. Sashittal, H. C. & Jassawalla, A. R. (2002). Cultures that Support Product-Innovation Process. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 42-54.
  7. Wagner III, J. A. (1994). Participation's Effects on Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of research evidence, Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210753
  8. Klein, K. J. & Sorra, J. S. (1996), The Challenge of Innovation Implementation, Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863
  9. Becker, T. E.(1992). Foci ana Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making, Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.5465/256481
  10. Yoon, K. & Chang, Y. (2016). IOT-based SMEs Producing Standardized Information System Model Analysis and Design, The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 2(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2016.2.1.87
  11. Dyer, L. & Reeves, T. (1995). Human Resource Strategies and Firm Performance: What Do We Know and Where Do We Need to Go?" International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199500000041
  12. McGraw, K. O. & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming Inferences about Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
  13. MacCallum, R. C. & Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
  14. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluation Structural Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312