The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.29-34
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Mobility and Gait Assessment Tools for Patients with Stroke

  • Jang, Ho Young (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Hoon (Department of Occupational Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh, Jung Lim (Department of Physical Therapy, Daewon University College) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Soo (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Suk Min (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Sahmyook University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.09
  • 심사 : 2018.02.28
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically analyze the reliability and validity of Korean versions of mobility and gait assessment tools for patients with stroke. Methods: Two reviewers conducted an independent literature search and systematically reviewed the literature. Literature published until June of 2017 was searched using search engines for electronic databases. The 2 reviewers reviewed the title and abstract of each article. Among the articles examined, we read the full text of those judged to be suitable for our study. We classified the selected data into research methods and results. The determination was made through mutual agreement. Results: The reviewers selected 5 articles related to the purpose of this study. The DGI was found to be moderately associated with BBS, 10MWT, and TUG in intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.92), inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.88), and concurrent validity tests. The FGA demonstrated a high level of reliability with intra-rater (ICC=0.92-0.95) and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.91, 0.95). The intra-rater reliability of the RMI was high at ICC=0.98. Its concurrent validity showed a high association with STREAM and BI. The intra-rater reliability of the MAS was ICC=0.75-0.99. Its inter-rater reliability was very high, exceeding 0.99. The inter-rater reliability of the Tinetti-gait Scale was ICC=0.91, and its concurrent validity was moderately associated with the DGI, 10WMT, OLST, FM-L/E, and STS. Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that the reliability and validity of the Korean versions of the mobility and gait assessment tools were high.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bohannon RW, Williams Andrews A, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehab Research. 1988;11:181-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198806000-00012
  2. Behrman AL, Lawless-Dixon AR, Davis SB et al. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005;85(12):1356-71.
  3. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4
  4. Jung T, Ozaki Y, Lai B et al. Comparison of energy expenditure between aquatic and overground treadmill walking in people post-stroke. Physiother Res Int. 2014;19:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1564
  5. Yu KH, Jeon HS. The effects of dual-task gait training on gait performance under cognitive tasks in chronic stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2015;27(5):364-8. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2015.27.5.364
  6. Ham SC, Lim CG. The effects of robot-assisted gait training with visual feedback on gait, balance and balance confidence in chronic stroke patients. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(2):71-6. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.2.71
  7. Kim HM, Son SM. Effect of action observation training with auditory feedback for gait function of stroke patients with hemiparesis. J Kor Phys Ther. 2017;29(5):246-54. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2017.29.5.246
  8. Horak FB. Clinical assessment of balance disorders. Gait Posture. 1997;6:76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(97)00018-0
  9. Tyson S, DeSouza L. The measurement of balance and walking poststroke. Part 2: functional performance tests. Phys Ther Rev. 2002;7:187-91. https://doi.org/10.1179/108331902235001615
  10. Tyson S, DeSouza L. A systematic review of methods to measure balance and walking post-stroke. Part 1: ordinal scales. Phys Ther Rev. 2002;7:173-86. https://doi.org/10.1179/108331902235001589
  11. Kim BO. Methods in clinical gait analysis. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1994;18:191-202.
  12. Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometrics properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:1018-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509339004
  13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  14. An SH, Seo HD, Chung YJ. Reliability and validity the Korean version of the dynamic gait index in patients with stroke. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2011;50:289-306.
  15. Won JI, Yu KH. Reliability of the functional gait assessment in patients with stroke. Phys Ther Korea. 2011;18:64-73.
  16. Kang HK, Jung KS, Chung YJ. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of Rivermead mobility index in patients with stroke. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2013;52:183-96.
  17. Cha YR, Jung KS, Chung YJ. Reliability of the Korean version of motor assessment scale in patients with stroke. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2013;52:279-93.
  18. An SH, Lee DG, Lee YB et al. Inter-rater absolute reliability and concurrent validity of Tinetti-gait scale (Korean version) in stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2014;9(2):201-11. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2014.9.2.201
  19. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
  20. Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK et al. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004;84(10):906-18.
  21. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF et al. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13(2):50-4. https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166684
  22. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175
  23. Tinetti ME. Performance oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34(2):119-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x
  24. Jang HY, Kim YL, Kim SJ et al. Perception and use of gait measures among physical therapists in South Korea. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2017;6(2):90-5. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2017.6.2.90
  25. Jang HY, Kim YL, Oh JL et al. Barriers to using balance and gait assessment tools by physical therapists in patients with neurological impairments: a systematic review. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2017;8(4):309-14.
  26. An SH, Lee GC, Lee KB et al. The inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the modified Rivermead mobility index for stroke survivors. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2016;55:277-95. https://doi.org/10.23944/isers.2016.09.55.4.14
  27. Park CS. The inter-rater absolute reliability and validity of the figure of 8 walk test in patients with chronic stroke. J Korea Acad Industr Coop Soc. 2017;18(5):467-74. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.1.467
  28. Park CS, An SH. The reliability and validity of the four square step test in stroke patients. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2017;56:309-25.
  29. Jang HY, Lee JH, Lee SM. The analysis on the reliability and validity of Korean-version balance assessment tools. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2017;12(4):139-46. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.4.139

피인용 문헌

  1. Development of Korean the Version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-K) vol.32, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.1.44