References
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "the social psychology of creativity.". Westview press.
- Bajarin, T. (2014, May 19). Why the Maker Movement Is Important to America's Future. Time, Retrieved from http://time.com/104210/aker-faire-maker-movement
- Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. Mac Arthur foundation series on digital learning-Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.
- Byun, M. K., & Cho, M. H. (2016). Examining ways to support engineering students for choosing a project topic in interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.1.37
- Byun, M. K., Jo, J. H., & Cho, M. H. (2015). The analysis of learner's motivation and satisfaction with 3D printing in science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(5), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0877
- Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.002
- Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. innovations, 7(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
- Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Praeger Publishers/ Geenwood Publishing Group.
- Gardner, H. (2008). 5 minds for the future. Harvard Business School Publishing.
- Gardner, H. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.
- Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Educ, State University New York Press.
- Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. London: Routledge.
- Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hwang, S. J. (2014). Discussion of 'The method of entrepreneurship development through the invention education'. Creative invention Educational Conference, 2, 135-137.
- Hyun, H. J., & Kim, K. H. (2014). Design⋅technology convergence for DIO type of training simulation. Korea Institute of Science and Art Forum, 18, 735-746.
- Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (Eds.). (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Routledge.
- Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective.
- Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
- Kalil, T. (2010). Remarks on innovation, education, and the Maker movement. New York Hall of Science. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/innovation-education-and-the-m.html
- Karakus, T. (2014). Practices and Potential of Activity Theory for Educational Technology Research. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer New York, 151-160.
- Kim, S. H. (2016a). Let's prepare for the intelligence information society future education. Retrieved from http://news.donga.com/View?gid=7882322&ate=20160501
- Kim, J. S. (2016b). Elementary School Pre-service Teachers Perception and Educational Needs toward Invention Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 28(2), 189-206.
- Kim, J. Y. (2017, Nobember, 11). 'Nuri Conflict' is now an old saying ... Reflects all of the 1 year budget of the Seoul Education Office, http://www.segye.com/newsView/20171110004679
- Kim, S. P., Byun, C. G., & Ha, H. H. (2014). Creativity and Entrepreneurship : What is The Relationship between Creativity and Entrepreneurship. Korean Management Consulting Review, 14(3), 67-78.
- Kim, Y. I., Choi, Y. H., Jeon, I. G., Lee, W. C., & Kwack, S. M. (2005). A study on the objective system and contents standards for an invention education through a school subject. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 24(3), 123-146.
- Kim, Y. J., & Nho, B. S. (2012). A study of entrepreneurship education effect on the self-leadership and entrepreneurship. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.6.023
- Kim, Y. O. (1996). Qualitative Research Methods and Design for Education and Research. Seoul: Muneumsa.
- Lee, E. S. (2015). Research Trends and Issues of Invention Education in Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education : Focussing on Journals in Korea. Journal of Practical Arts Education, 31(3), 333-356.
- Lee, B. W., Shim, K. C., & Kim, H. B. (2017). Perception of Science Educators about Invention Education in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 37(1), 17-24.
- Lee, K. N., Lee, B. W., & Park, K. M. (2013). Comparative analysis of similar studies for establishing identity of the invention education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 42-62.
- Lee, J. H., Park, G. B., Jin, S. U., Ryu, J. Y., Lee, S. C., An, S. H., & Jin, B. U. (2012). Understanding Characteristics of the Gifted in Invention for Establishing the Concept of the Gifted in Invention. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 551-573. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.551
- Lee, J. H., Park, G. B., Jin, S. U, Jun, M. L. (2014). Teachers' Perception on Differentiation of Gifted Education in Invention from Gifted Education in Science. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 597-612. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.597
- Lee, J. H., Park, K. B. (2014). Conceptions Toward ICT in Students of Giftedness in Invention Classes. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 551-573. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.551
- Lee, J. H., Yang, H. I., & Sun, J. Y. (2012). Korean science and technology innovation ODA strategy. Policy Research, 1-346.
- Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4.
- Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing modern knowledge press.
- McCue, T. J. (2011). First public library to create a maker space. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2011/11/15/first-public-libraryto-create-a-maker-space
- Milne, L. (2013). Nurturing the designerly thinking and design capabilities of five-year-olds: Technology in the new entrant classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9182-4
- Ministry of education (2014). 2015 released general remarks' highlights of the integrated curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/106888/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=339&boardSeq=56875
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014). Endless imagining room operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1677&uid=4277&mod=document
- Mun, D. Y. (2012). The Process of Inventive Idea Creation of Inventively Gifted Elementary School Students: A Case Study on the Six Thinking Hats. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 25(2), 63-83.
- Park, G. Y., & Choi, H. S. (2011). A Study of teaching-learning practices in education center for the talented in invention. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 30(4), 281-300.
- Park, Y, S. (2016). The Period of Makers. Kyung-gi: Kyobo Book Centre.
- Park, Y. S., Glenn. J., & Gorden, T. (2014). The UN Future Report 2045, Kyung-gi: Kyobo Book Centre.
- Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306
- Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
- Pink, D. H. (2006). Whole new mind : why right-brainers will rule the future. Seoul: The Korea Economic Daily.
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Routledge.
- Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
- Seo, H, A., Cho, S. H., Kim, H. W., Jung, H. C., & Sohn, Y. A. (2002). Invention Education Content Standards Development. KIPO Research Reports.
- Seo, H. E., Jeong, H. C., Son, J. W., Lee, B. J., & Maeng, H. J. (2006). Development of content standards for invention education. Seoul:Korean Educational Development Institute, Daejeon: Korea Intellectual Property Office.
- Shin, D. H. (2014), Collaboration between the human and the computer, Seoul: Communication Books.
- Sim, J. H., Lee, Y. L., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM Education, and Addressing the Issues Facing STEAM in the Korean Context. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(4), 709-723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709
- Sohn, S. J. (2013). Creative economy perspective intellectual property professionals demand outlook. Science and Technology Policy, 193, 72-88.
- Son, J. W. (2014). The method of Invention educational approaches in science education curriculum dimension when developed integrated curriculum. Korea Association for Gifted Children Alliance Conference, 2014(1), 103-110.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
- Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2014). Click here to print a maker movement supply chain: how invention and entrepreneurship will disrupt supply chain design. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12045
- Winn, W. (2002). Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068530070
- Yoo, G. U., Jung, J. W., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. B. (2012). Understanding of qualitative research methods. Seoul: Bakyoungsa.
- Yuk, G. C. (2005). Groping of a New Evaluation Method using the Knowledge State Analysis in the Selective Examination of Scientifical Gifted, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 15(1), 37-48.
- Yuk, G. C., Choi, S. N., Han, S. L., Park, S. T., Ryu, J. Y., Mang, D. S., Won, H. J., Kim, Y. S., Lee, J. M., Chun, G. K. (2011). The recommendations freedom optional multilevel selection models and observations for selected gifted invention. The new paradigm of gifted education: Meta-type development of invention gifted education, Korea Invention Promotion Association.
Cited by
- 텍스트 마이닝을 이용한 메이커 운동의 트렌드 분석 vol.18, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2018.18.12.468
- 학교내 무한상상실을 활용한 메이커교육 프로그램 적용이 초등학생의 창의적 문제해결력과 자기주도적 학습력에 미치는 효과 vol.40, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.55