Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predictability of Elementary Students' Self-Regulated Learning, GRIT and Parents Support on Computational Thinking and Learning Satisfaction in Online Software Education

온라인 SW교육에서 초등학생의 컴퓨팅사고력 및 학습만족도에 대한 자기조절학습, 그릿, 부모지원의 예측력 규명

  • Lee, Jeongmin (Dept of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Chae, Yoojung (KAIST Global Institute for Telented Education) ;
  • Lee, Myunghwa (Dept of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이정민 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 채유정 (카이스트 과학영재교육원) ;
  • 이명화 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.23
  • Accepted : 2018.12.26
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prediction of self-regulated learning, GRIT and parents support on computational thinking and learning satisfaction in online software education. The participants were 71 elementary students who attended to an online software education which K university offered in Spring 2018. The 63 of cases were used to analyze by SPSS. The key findings were as follows: First, self-regulated learning and GRIT significantly predicted computational thinking. Second, self-regulated learning and GRIT significantly predicted learning satisfaction. This research suggested the implications for computational thinking and learning satisfaction in online software education.

본 연구의 목적은 온라인 SW교육에서 초등학생의 컴퓨팅사고력과 학습만족도에 대한 자기조절학습, 그릿, 부모지원의 예측력을 규명하는데 있다. 이를 위해 2018년 여름 광역시 소재 K대학교의 온라인 SW교육프로그램을 수강한 초등학생 71명이 본 연구에 참여하였으며, 최종적으로 63명의 데이터가 분석에 사용되었다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 자기조절학습, 그릿은 컴퓨팅사고력을 유의하게 예측하였다. 둘째, 자기조절학습, 그릿은 학습 만족도를 유의하게 예측하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 온라인 SW교육에서 초등학생의 컴퓨팅사고력과 학습만족도 향상을 위한 요인을 규명하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2014). Research for Introducing Computational Thinking into Primary and Secondary Education. Seoul : Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  2. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  3. Kim, J. M. & Lee, W. K. (2014). Controversial Issues in Knowledge and Problem Solving Skills of Information Subjects Observed after Amending the Curriculum in the U.K. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 17(3), 54-64,
  4. The Korean Ministry of education (2015). Software education operating guide. Seoul: The Korean Ministry of education.
  5. Song, U. & Gil, J. (2017). Development and Application of Software Education Program Based on Blended Learning for Improving Computational Thinking of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers. Korea Information Processing Society, 6(7), 353-360.
  6. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development & Korea Education & Research Information Service (2004). White paper on ICT in Education Korea. Seoul : Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  7. Chae, Y., Lee, S., & Parrk, S. (2016). Analysis of The Perception of Effectiveness and Satisfaction According to Learners' Background Variables and Characteristics in Online Gifted Education Program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 26(4), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.4.611
  8. Sung, E. Jin, S. H., & Yoo. M. (2016). Exploring Learning Data for Supporting Self-Directed Learning in the Perspective of Learning Analytics. Korean Society and Educational Technology, 32(3), 487-533.
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  10. Kim, D., & Keum, J. (2015). The Effect of Mobile Self Efficacy, Achievement Goal Orientation and School Belonging on School Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Open Middle School. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 11(3), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2015.08.11.3.39
  11. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
  12. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  13. Joo, Y. J. & Kim, D. (2016). Influence of Grit (Perseverance of Effort and Consistency of Interest), Teacher Support, and Parent Support on Self-Regulation and Educational Satisfaction in Children in a Gifted Education Program. Special Education Research, 15(1), 24-49.
  14. Song, Y. H. (2011). Effects of Parent Educational Supporting Activities on Learning Motivation and Study Habit of Elementary Students. Journal of elementary education studies, 18(2), 183, 202.
  15. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi delta kappan, 76(9), 701-712.
  16. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
  17. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  18. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12 A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
  19. Chung, M. (2005). The Development of Self-Regulated Learning Test for University Students. Korean Society for Educational Evaluation, 18(3), 155-181.
  20. Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  21. Huh, J. (2014). Variables Related to the Self-regulating Ability of Elementary School Children. The Korean Entertainment Industry Association, 8(1), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2014.03.8.1.87
  22. Azevedo, R. & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
  23. Hwang, M, Ha, H. S., & Kim, M. (2017). Grit and Academic Achievement among Elementary School Students: The Mediating Role of Academic Self-Regulation. The Korean Journal of Elementary Counseling, 16(3), 301-319.
  24. Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. (2016). How Does Grit Impact College Students' Academic Achievement in Science? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 33-43.
  25. Davidson, B. (2014). Examining the relationship between non-cognitive skills and leadership: The influence of hope and grit on transformational leadership behavior. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  26. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131378
  27. Lee, J. L., & Kwon, D. H. (2016). An Analysis of Structural Relationship among Locus of Control, Mindset, Grit, and Academic Achievement. Korea Youth Research Association, 23(11), 245-264.
  28. Epstein, J. L., Herrick, S. C., & Coates, L. (1996). Effects of summer home learning packets on student achievement in language arts in the middle grades. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(4), 383-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345960070406
  29. Mun, E. S., & Kim, C. H. (2003). of Parental Involvement and the Academic Motivation and Achievement of Elementary and Middle School Students. Korea educational Psychology Association, 17(2), 271-288.
  30. Joo. Y., Kim, D. & Lim, E. (2015). The Structural Relationship among Task Commitment, Self Regulation Learning Ability, Parent Support, Satisfaction and Achievement in Gifted Education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(4), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.4.529
  31. Kim, M. S. (2007). An Analysis of the Gifted Students" and Their Parents" Satisfaction on Gifted Education. The Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 6(2), 165-188.
  32. McCoy, C. W. (2001). The relationship of self-directed learning, technological self-efficacy, and satisfaction of adult learners in a digital learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama.
  33. Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (2015). Examining structural relationships among self-regulated learning, flow, satisfaction, and continuous intention to use smart learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 127-150.
  34. King, A. L. D., Huebner, S., Suldo, S. M., & Valois, R. F. (2006). An ecological view of school satisfaction in adolescence: Linkages between social support and behavior problems. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-007-9021-7
  35. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  36. DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self-and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
  37. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
  38. Korkmaz, O., Cakir, R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2015). Computational thinking levels scale (ctls) adaptation for secondary school level. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences, 1(2), 143-162.
  39. Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 48-58.
  40. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16