Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.187-193
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of fracture characters on flow distribution under different Reynold numbers

  • Wang, Jing (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Li, Shu-Cai (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Li, Li-Ping (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University) ;
  • Gao, Cheng-Lu (Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.19
  • 심사 : 2017.07.11
  • 발행 : 2018.02.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Water inrush through the destruction of water resisting rock mass structure was divided into direct water inrush, key block water inrush and splitting water inrush. In the direct water inrush, the Reynolds numbers has a significant effect on the distribution of the water flow and vortex occurred in the large Reynolds numbers. The permeability coefficient of the fracture is much larger than the rock, and the difference is between 104 and 107 times. The traditional theory and methods are not considering the effect of inertia force. In the position of the cross fracture, the distribution of water flow can only be linearly distributed according to the fracture opening degree. With the increase of Reynolds number, the relationship between water flow distribution and fracture opening is studied by Semtex.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Natural Science Foundation of China, South China University of Technology, China University of Mining & Technology

참고문헌

  1. Barton, K.J. and Derham, J. (1987), "Geophysical surveys over fracture-zones in the galway granite at mace head, Co Galway, Ireland", Geophys. J. Royal Astron. Soc., 89(1), 456-456.
  2. He, Y., Tao, Y. and Yang, L. (2010), "Experimental research on hydraulic behaviors in a single joint with various values of JRC", Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 29(S1), 3235-3240.
  3. Indraratna, B. and Ranjith, P.G. (2001), "Laboratory measurement of two-phase flow parameters in rock joints based on high pressure triaxial testing", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 127(6), 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:6(530)
  4. Johnson, J., Brown, S. and Stockman, H. (2006), "Fluid flow and mixing in rough-walled fracture intersections", J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 111(B12), 206.
  5. Kosakowski, G. and Berkowitz, B. (1999), "Flow pattern variability in natural fracture intersections", Geophys. Res. Lett., 26(12), 1765-1768. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900344
  6. Li, S.C., Wu, J., Xu, Z.H., Li, L.P., Huang, X., Xue, Y.G. and Wang, Z.C. (2016), "Numerical analysis of water flow characteristics after inrushing from the tunnel floor in process of karst tunnel excavation", Geomech. Eng., 10(4), 471-526. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.10.4.471
  7. Mourzenko, V.V., Thovert, J.F. and Adler, P.M. (1995), "Permeability of a single fracture: Validity of the Reynolds equation", J. Phys. II, 5(3), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1051/jp2:1995133
  8. Nelson, R. (2001), Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, Gulf Professional Publishing, Woburn, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
  9. Niroumand, H., Mehrizi, M.E.M. and Saaly, M. (2016), "Application of mesh-free smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for study of soil behavior", Geomech. Eng., 11(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.1.001
  10. Patera, A.T. (1984), "A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: Laminar flow in a channel expansion", J. Comput. Phys., 54(3), 468-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90128-1
  11. Singhal, B.B.S. and Gupta, R.P. (2010), Fractures and Discontinuities, Springer, The Netherlands.
  12. Singhal, B.B.S. and Gupta, RP. (2010), Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks, Springer, The Netherlands.
  13. Sultan, M.A., Fonte, C.P., Dias, M.M., Lopes, J.C.B. and Santos, R.J. (2012), "Experimental study of flow regime and mixing in T-jets mixers", Chem. Eng. Sci., 73, 388-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.02.010
  14. Tartakovsky, AM., Trask, N. and Pan, K. (2016), "Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and its applications for multiphase flow and reactive transport in porous media", Comput. Geosci., 20(4), 807-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9468-9
  15. Wang, Z.L., Shen, L.F., Li, S.J and Xu, Z.M. (2017), "Seepage characteristics of a single fracture based on lattice Boltzmann method", Rock Soil Mech., 38(4), 1203-1210.
  16. Wang, Z.S., Li, Y., Zhu, W.S., Xue, Y.G., Jiang, B. and Sun, Y.B. (2017), "Field monitoring of splitting failure for surrounding rock masses and applications of energy dissipation model", Geomech. Eng., 12(4), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.4.595
  17. Wilson, C.R. and Witherspoon, P.A. (1976), "Flow interference effects at fracture intersections", Water Resour. Res., 12(1), 102-104. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i001p00102
  18. Zhou, Y. (2015), "Study on water inrush mechanism and early warning of filled piping-type disaster and its engineering applications in tunnels", Ph.D. Dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

피인용 문헌

  1. Permeability Characteristics of Water-Sand Seepage in Fracture by Experiment vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7199627