DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic behavior of beam-to-column connections with elliptic slit dampers

  • Received : 2017.01.08
  • Accepted : 2017.10.24
  • Published : 2018.02.10

Abstract

The rigid steel connections were suffered severe damage because of low rotational capacity during earthquakes. Hence, many investigations have been conducted on the connections of steel structures. As a solution, steel slit dampers were employed at the connections to prevent brittle failure of connections and damage of main structural members. Slit damper is a plate or a standard section with a number of slits in the web. The objective of this paper is to improve the seismic performance of steel slit dampers in the beam-to-column connection using finite element modeling. With reviewing the previous investigations, it is observed that slit dampers were commonly fractured in the end parts of the struts. This may be due to the low participation of struts middle parts in the energy dissipation. Thus, in the present study slit damper with elliptic slits is proposed in such a way that end parts of struts have more energy absorption area than struts middle parts. A parametric study is conducted to investigate the effects of geometric parameters of elliptic slit damper such as strut width, strut height and plate thickness on the seismic performance of the beam-to-column connection. The stress distribution is improved along the struts in the proposed slit damper with elliptic slits and the stress concentration is decreased in the end parts of struts. The average contributions of elliptic slit dampers, beam and other sections to the energy dissipation are about 97.19%, 2.12% and 0.69%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS, Version 9.10 (2010), Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
  2. ABAQUS/CAE User's Manual (2010), Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
  3. AISC (2005), Seismic Provision for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL., USA.
  4. Bayat, M. and Bayat, M. (2014), "Seismic behavior of special moment-resisting frames with energy dissipating devices under near source ground motions", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(5), 533-557. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.533
  5. Benavent-Climent, A. (2010), "A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections", Eng. Struct., 32(4), 1113-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.037
  6. Bergman, D.M. and Goel, S.C. (1987), "Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel plate devices for added damping and stiffness", Report No. UMCE87-10.MI; University of Michigan, MI, USA.
  7. Chan, R.W.K. and Albermani, F. (2008), "Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation", Eng. Struct., 30(4), 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.005
  8. FEMA-350 (2000), Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  9. Ghabraie, K., Chan, R., Huang, X. and Xie, Y.M. (2010), "Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy", Eng. Struct., 32(8), 2258-2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.028
  10. Hedayat, A.A. (2015), "Prediction of the force displacement capacity boundary of an unbuckled steel slit damper", J. Constr. Steel Res., 114, 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.003
  11. Karavasilis, T.L., Kerawala, S. and Hale, E. (2012), "Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings", J. Constr. Steel Res., 70, 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.010
  12. Ke, K. and Chen, Y. (2014), "Energy-based damage-control design of steel frames with steel slit walls", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 52(6), 1157-1176. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1157
  13. Ke, K. and Yam, M.C.H. (2016), "Energy-factor-based damagecontrol evaluation of steel MRF systems with fuses", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 22(3), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.589
  14. Kobori, T., Miura, Y., Fukusawa, E., Yamada, T., Arita, T., Takenaka, Y., Miyagawa, N., Tanaka, N. and Fukumoto, T. (1992), "Development and application of hysteresis steel dampers", Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, July.
  15. Koken, A. and Koroglu, M.A. (2014), "Experimental study on beam-to-column connections of steel frame structures with steel slit dampers", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., ASCE, 29(2), 04014066.
  16. Lee, J. and Kim, J. (2015), "Seismic performance evaluation of moment frames with slit-friction hybrid dampers", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 9(6), 1291-1311. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1291
  17. Lee, M.-H., Oh, S.-H., Huh, C., Oh, Y.-S., Yoon, M.-H. and Moon, T.-S. (2002), "Ultimate energy absorption capacity of steel plate slit dampers subjected to shear force", Steel Struct., 2(2), 71-79.
  18. Lima, C., Martinelli, E. and Faella, C. (2015), "Cost-competitive steel devices for seismic retrofitting of RC frames: Model identification and nonlinear analysis", J. Steel Struct. Constr., 1, 104.
  19. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2010a), "Pipe damper, part I: experimental and analytical study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(8-9), 1088-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.010
  20. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2010b), "Pipe damper, part II: application to bridges", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(8-9), 1096-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.011
  21. Maleki, S. and Mahjoubi, S. (2013), "Dual-pipe damper", J. Constr. Steel Res., 85, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.004
  22. Nakashima, M., Iwai, S., Iwata, M., Takeuchi, T., Konomi, S., Akazawa, T. and Saburi, K. (1994), "Energy dissipation behaviours of shear panels made of low yield steel", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23(12), 1299-1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290231203
  23. Oh, S.-H. (1998), "Seismic design of energy dissipating multi-story frame with flexible-stiff mixed type connection", Ph.D. Dissertation; Tokyo University, Japan.
  24. Oh, S.-H., Kim, Y.-J. and Ryu, H.-S. (2009), "Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers", Eng. Struct., 31(9), 1997-2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.003
  25. Saffari, H., Hedayat, A.A. and Poorsadeghi Nejad, M. (2013), "Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility", J. Constr. Steel Res., 80, 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.023
  26. Soong, T.T. and Spencer Jr., B.F. (2002), "Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice", Eng. Struct., 24(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X
  27. Tagawa, H. and Gao, J. (2012), "Evaluation of vibration control system with U-dampers based on quasi-linear motion mechanism", J. Constr. Steel Res., 70, 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.09.004
  28. Tagawa, H., Yamanishi, T., Takaki, A. and Chan, R.W.K. (2016), "Cyclic behavior of seesaw energy dissipation system with steel slit dampers", J. Constr. Steel Res., 117, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.014
  29. Tsai, K., Chen, H., Hong, C. and Su, Y. (1993), "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction", Earthq. Spectra, 9(3), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727
  30. Wada, A., Huang, Y.H., Yamada, T., Ono, Y., Sugiyama, S., Baba, M. and Miyabara, T. (1997), "Actual size and real time speed tests for hysteretic steel damper", Proceedings of Stessa, Kyoto, Japan, August, pp. 778-785.
  31. Zahrai, S.M. (2015), "Cyclic testing of chevron braced steel frames with IPE shear panels", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(5), 1167-1184. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.5.1167
  32. Zhang, C., Zhou, Y., Weng, D.G., Lu, D.H. and Wu, C.X. (2015), "A methodology for design of metallic dampers in retrofit of earthquake-damaged frame", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 56(4), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.4.569

Cited by

  1. Further study on improvement on strain concentration in through-diaphragm connection vol.39, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.2.135