Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제31권3호
  • /
  • Pages.457-466
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acidification of pig slurry effects on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and perennial ryegrass regrowth as estimated by 15N-urea flux

  • Park, Sang Hyun (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Bok Rye (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Kwang Hwa (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Tae Hwan (Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.25
  • 심사 : 2017.12.02
  • 발행 : 2018.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The present study aimed to assess the nitrogen (N) use efficiency of acidified pig slurry for regrowth yield and its environmental impacts on perennial ryegrass swards. Methods: The pH of digested pig slurry was adjusted to 5.0 or 7.0 by the addition of sulfuric acid and untreated as a control. The pig slurry urea of each treatment was labeled with $^{15}N$ urea and applied at a rate of 200 kg N/ha immediately after cutting. Soil and herbage samples were collected at 7, 14, and 56 d of regrowth. The flux of pig slurry-N to regrowth yield and soil N mineralization were analyzed, and N losses via $NH_3$, $N_2O$ emission and $NO_3{^-}$ leaching were also estimated. Results: The pH level of the applied slurry did not have a significant effect on herbage yield or N content of herbage at the end of regrowth, whereas the amount of N derived from pig slurry urea (NdfSU) was higher in both herbage and soils in pH-controlled plots. The $NH_4{^+}-N$ content and the amount of N derived from slurry urea into soil $NH_4{^+}$ fraction ($NdfSU-NH_4{^+}$) was significantly higher in in the pH 5 plot, whereas $NO_3{^-}$ and $NdfSU-NO_3{^-}$ were lower than in control plots over the entire regrowth period. Nitrification of $NH_4{^+}-N$ was delayed in soil amended with acidified slurry. Compared to non-pH-controlled pig slurry (i.e. control plots), application of acidified slurry reduced $NH_3$ emissions by 78.1%, $N_2O$ emissions by 78.9% and $NO_3{^-}$ leaching by 17.81% over the course of the experiment. Conclusion: Our results suggest that pig slurry acidification may represent an effective means of minimizing hazardous environmental impacts without depressing regrowth yield.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Outcome of animal waste generation and recycling (2006-2012). Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2013.
  2. Schroder J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer values spares the environment. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:253-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.015
  3. Fanguerio D, Maibritt H, Gioelli F. Acidification of animal slurry - a review. J Environ Manage 2015;149:46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.001
  4. Bittman S, Mikkelsen R. Ammonia emissions from agricultural operations: livestock. Better Crops 2009;93:28-31.
  5. Chantigny MH, Angers DA, Morvan T, Pomar C. Dynamics of pig slurry nitrogen in soil and plant as determined with $^{15}N$. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2004;68:637-43. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.6370
  6. Hoekstra NJ, Lalor STJ, Richards KG, et al. Slurry $^{15}NH_{4}$-N recovery in herbage and soil: effects of application method and timing. Plant soil 2010;330:357-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0210-z
  7. EEA. Ammonia ($NH_3$) emissions (APE 003) [Internet]. Copenhagen, Denmark: 2014 [cited 2014 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-ammonia-nh3-emissions-1/assessment-4
  8. Eriksen J, Norgaard JV, Poulsen HD, et al. Effects of acidifying pig diets on emissions of ammonia, methane, and sulfur from slurry during storage. J Environ Qual 2014;43:2086-95. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.03.0108
  9. Balsari P, Dinuccio E, Gioelli F. A low cost solution for ammonia emissionabatement from slurry storage. Int Congr Ser 2006;1293:323-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.045
  10. Webb J, Pain B, Bittman S, Morgan J. The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response - a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2010;137:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.001
  11. Gilsanz C, Baez D, Misselbrook TH, Dhanoa MS, Cardenas LM. Development of emission factors and efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors, DCD and DMPP. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2016;216:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.030
  12. Moeletsi ME, Tongwane MI. 2004 Methane and nitrous oxide emission from manure management in South Africa. Animals 2015;5:193-205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5020193
  13. Fangueiro D, Pereira J, Bichana A, et al. Effects of cattle-slurry treatment by acidification and separation on nitrogen dynamics and global warming potential after surface application to an acidic soil. J Environ Manage 2015;162:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.032
  14. Kai P, Pedersen P, Jensen JE, Hansen MN, Sommer SG. A whole-fram assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emission. Eur J Agron 2008;28:148-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.06.004
  15. Birkmose T, Vestergaard A. Acidification of slurry in barns, stores and during application: review of Danish research, trials and experience. In: Proceedings from the 15th RAMIRAN Conference; 2013 Jun 3-5: Versailles, France.
  16. Petersen J, Lemming C, Rubaek GH. Side-band injection of acidified cattle slurry as starter P-fertilization for maize seedlings. In: Proceedings from the 15th RAMIRAN Conference; 2013 Jun 3-5: Versailles, France.
  17. Gustafsson G, Jeppsson KH. Ammonia reduction from dairy houses. In: Geers R, Madec F, editors. Livestock production and society. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2006. p. 167-79.
  18. Ourry A, Bourcaud J, Salette J. Partitioning and remobilization of nitrogen during regrowth of ryegrass subjected to nitrogen deficiency. Crop Sci 1990;30:1251-4.
  19. Kim TH, Ourry A, Boucaud J, Lemaire G. Changes in sourcesink relationship for nitrogen during regrowth of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) following removal of shoots. Aust J Plant Physiol 1991;18:593-602.
  20. Ndegwa PM, Vaddella VK, Hristov AN, Joo HS. Measuring concentration of ammonia in ambient air or exhaust air steam using acid traps. J Environ Qual 2009;38:647-53. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0211
  21. Kim TH, Kim BH. Ammonia microdiffusion and colorimetric method for determining nitrogen in plant tissues. J Korean Soc Grassl Sci 1996;16:253-9.
  22. Guo Y, Li B, Di H, Zhang L, Gao Z. Effects of dicyandiamide (DCD) on nitrate leaching, gaseous emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide in a greenhouse vegetable production system in northern China. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2012;58:647-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.726921
  23. Kelly H, Annemie R, Hauke S, Dirk S, Winnie D. Determinants of the microbial community structure of eutrophic, hyporheic river sediments polluted with chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2014;87:715-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12260
  24. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Statistics (fourth ed.). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 1982.
  25. Park SH, Lee BR, Cho WM, Kim TH. Comparative nitrogen use efficiency of urea and pig slurry for regrowth yield and nutritive value in perennial ryegrass sward. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:514-22.
  26. Burger M, Jackson LE. Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 2003;35:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00233-X
  27. Choi WJ, Ro HM, Chang SX. Recovery of fertilizer-derived inorganic-$^{15}N$ in a vegetable field soil as affected by application of an organic amendment. Plant Soil 2004;263:191-201. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047726.09394.d3
  28. Fangueiro D, Surgy S, Coutinho J, Vasconcelos E. Impact of cattle slurry acidification on carbon and nitrogen dynamics during storage and after soil incorporation. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 2013;176:540-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200117
  29. Sorensen P, Eriksen J. Effect of slurry acidification with sulphuric acid combined with aeration on the turnover and plant availability of nitrogen. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2009;131:240-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.024
  30. Gandhapudi SK, Coyne MS, Angelo EMD, Matocha C. Potential nitrification in alum treated soil slurries amended with poultry manure. Biores Technol 2006;97:664-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.017
  31. Frost JP, Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ. Effect of separation and acidification of cattle slurry on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. J Agric Sci 1990;115:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600073901
  32. Xu X, Zhou L, Van Cleemput O, Wang Z. Fate of Urea-$^{15}N$ in a soil-wheat system as influenced by urease inhibitor bydroquinone and nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide. Plant Soil 2000;220:261-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004715827085
  33. Zaman M, Zaman S, Adhinarayanan C, et al. Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on the efficient use of urea for pastoral systems. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2013;59:649-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2013.812940
  34. Choi WJ, Jin SA, Lee SM, RO HM, Yoo SH. Corn uptake and microbial immobilization of $^{15}N$-labeled urea-N in soil as affected by composted pig manure. Plant Soil 2001;235:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011896912888
  35. Fangueiro D, Ribeiro H, Coutinho J, et al. Nitrogen mineralization and $CO_{2}\;and\;N_{2}O$ emissions in a sandy soil amended with original or acidified pig slurries or with the relative fractions. Biol Fertil Soil 2010;46:383-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0444-1
  36. Wang K, Huang D, Ying H, Luo H. Effects of acidification during storage on emissions of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from digested pig slurry. Biosyst Eng 2014;122:23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.002
  37. Erisman JW, Schaap M. The need for ammonia abatement with respect to secondary PM reductions in Europe. Environ Pollut 2004;129:159-63.
  38. Dai X, Karring H. A determination and comparison of urease activity in feces and fresh manure from pig and cattle in relation to ammonia production and pH changes. PLoS One 2014;9:e110402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110402
  39. Petersen SO, Andersen AJ, Eriksen J. Effects of cattle slurry acidification on ammonia and methane evolution during storage. J Environ Qual 2012;41:88-94. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0184
  40. Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ, Frost JP. Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries. J Agric Sci 1989;113:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600070106
  41. Nyord T, Liu D, Eriksen J, Adamsen APS. Effect of acidifcation and soil injection of animal slurry on ammonia and odour emission In: Proceedings from the 15th RAMIRAN Conference; 2013 Jun 3-5: Versailles, France.
  42. Bussink DW, Huijsmans JFM, Ketelaars JJMH. Ammonia volatilization from nitric-acid-treated cattle slurry. Neth J Agric Sci 1994;42:4.
  43. Pain BF, Misselbrook TH, Rees YJ. Effects of nitrificaiton inhibitor and acid addition to cattle slurry on nitrogen losses and herbage. Grass Forage Sci 1994;49:209-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb01994.x
  44. Velthof G, Oenema O. Nitrous oxide from nitric-acid-treated cattle slurry applied to grassland under semi-controlled conditions. Neth J Agric Sci 1993;41:81-93.
  45. Berg W, Turk M, Hellebrand HJ. Effects of acidifying liquid cattle manure with nitric or lactic acid on gaseous emissions. Workshop on Agricultureal Air Quality. Washington D.C USA: State of the Science, Department of Communication Service, North Carolina State University, Potomac, Maryland, USA; 2006. p. 492-8.
  46. Morvan T, Leterme P, Arsene GG, Mary B. Nitrogen transformations after the spreading of pig slurry on bare soil and ryegrass using $^{15}N$-labelled ammonium. Eur J Agron 1997;7:181-8.
  47. Cookson WR, Rowarth JS, Cameron KC. The effect of autumn applied $^{15}N$-labelled fertilizer on nitrate leaching in a cultivated soil during winter. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 2000;56:99-107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009823114444

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Injection Application of Pig Slurry on Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Timothy (<i>Phleum pretense</i> L.) Sward vol.38, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.3.145
  2. Aeration of pig slurry affects ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions vol.16, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02388-2
  3. A 4-year field measurement of N2O emissions from a maize-wheat rotation system as influenced by partial organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer vol.263, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110384
  4. Effects of slurry acidification on soil N2O fluxes and denitrification vol.184, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100095
  5. Urease and nitrification inhibitors with pig slurry effects on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and nitrogen use efficiency in perennial ryegrass sward vol.34, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0046