DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recommendation for the modelling of 3D non-linear analysis of RC beam tests

  • Sucharda, Oldrich (Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava) ;
  • Konecny, Petr (Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava)
  • Received : 2017.05.16
  • Accepted : 2017.09.11
  • Published : 2018.01.25

Abstract

The possibilities of non-linear analysis of reinforced-concrete structures are under development. In particular, current research areas include structural analysis with the application of advanced computational and material models. The submitted article aims to evaluate the possibilities of the determination of material properties, involving the tensile strength of concrete, fracture energy and the modulus of elasticity. To evaluate the recommendations for concrete, volume computational models are employed on a comprehensive series of tests. The article particularly deals with the issue of the specific properties of fracture-plastic material models. This information is often unavailable. The determination of material properties is based on the recommendations of Model Code 1990, Model Code 2010 and specialized literature. For numerical modelling, the experiments with the so called "classic" concrete beams executed by Bresler and Scordelis were selected. It is also based on the series of experiments executed by Vecchio. The experiments involve a large number of reinforcement, cross-section and span variants, which subsequently enabled a wider verification and discussion of the usability of the non-linear analysis and constitutive concrete model selected.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE (1982), Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete, State of the Art Rep. No., 545.
  2. Barzegar, F. (1988), "Layering of RC membrane and plate elements in nonlinear analysis", J. Struct. Div., 114(11), 2474-2492. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:11(2474)
  3. Bazant, Z. and Planas, J. (1998), Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials, CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.
  4. Bazant, Z.P., Caner, F.C., Carol, I., Adley, M.D. and Akers, S.A. (2000), "Microplane model M4 for concrete: I. formulation with work-conjugate deviatoric stress", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(9), 944-961. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(944)
  5. Bresler, B. and Scordelis, A.C. (1963), "Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams", J. Am. Concrete Inst., 60(1), 51-72.
  6. Cervenka, J. and Papanikolaou, V.K. (2008), "Three dimensional combined fracture-plastic material model for concrete", Int. J. Plast., 24(12), 2192-2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.01.004
  7. Cervenka, V., Jendele, L. and Cervenka, J. (2007), ATENA Program Documentation-Part 1: Theory, Praha, Czech Republic.
  8. Chen, W.F. (1982), Plasticity in Reinforced Concrete, New York, Graw Hill.
  9. Filippou, F.C. (1986), "A simple model for reinforcing bar anchorages under cyclic excitations", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 112(7), 1639-1659. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:7(1639)
  10. Gamino, A.L., Manzoli, O.L., de Oliveira e Sousa, J.L. and Bittencourt, T.N. (2010), "2D evaluation of crack openings using smeared and embedded crack models", Comput. Concrete, 7(6), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2010.7.6.483
  11. ISO 2394 (1998), General Principles on Reliability for Structures, ISO.
  12. JCSS (2016), Probabilistic Model Code, JCSS Working Material, http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/.
  13. Kwak, H.G. (1990), "Material nonlinear finite element analysis and optimal design of reinforced concrete structures", Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST, Korea.
  14. Kwak, H.G. and Filippou, F.C. (1995), "New reinforcing steel model with bond-slip", Struct. Eng. Mech., 3(4), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1995.3.4.299
  15. Kwak, H.G. and Filippou F.C. (1990), "Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures under monotonic loads", Report No. UCB/SEMM-90/14, Berkeley, California.
  16. Lehky, D., Kersner, Z. and Novak, D. (2013), "FraMePID-3PB software for material parameter dentification using fracture tests and inverse analysis", Adv. Eng. Softw., 72, 147-154.
  17. Lu, W.Y., Hsiao, H.T., Chen, C.L. Huang, S.M. and Lin, M.C. (2015), "Tests of reinforced concrete deep beams", Comput. Concrete, 15(3), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.15.3.357
  18. Menetrey, P. and Willam, K.J. (1995) "Triaxial failure criterion for concrete and its generalization", ACI Struct. J., 92(3), 311-318.
  19. Model Code 1990 (1993), Final draft, fib, Bulletin no. 213/214.
  20. Model Code 2010 (2012), Final draft, fib, Bulletin no. 65 and 66, 1-2.
  21. Planas, J., Guinea, G.V. and Elices, M. (1999), "Size effect and inverse analysis in concrete fracture", Int. J. Fract., 95, 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018681124551
  22. Shah, S.P. (1990), "Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete", Mater. Struct., 23(6), 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472030
  23. Strauss, A., Zimmermann, T., Lehky, D., Novak, D. and Kersner, Z. (2014), "Stochastic fracture-mechanical parameters for the performance-based design of concrete structures", Struct. Concrete, 15(3), 380-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300077
  24. Sucharda, O. and Brozovsky, J. (2011), "Models for reinforcement in final finite element analysis of structures", Tran. VSB-Tech. Univ. Ostrava, Civil Eng. Ser., 11(2), 1804-4824.
  25. Sucharda, O. and Brozovsky, J. (2013), "Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced concrete beams", Int. J. Mech., 7(3), 192-200.
  26. Sucharda, O., Pajak, M., Ponikiewski, T. and Konecny, P. (2017) "Identification of mechanical and fracture properties of selfcompacting concrete beams with different types of steel fibres using inverse analysis", Constr. Build. Mater., 138, 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.077
  27. Vecchio, F.J. (2000), "Disturbed stress field model for reinforced concrete: Formulation", J. Struct. Eng., 126(9), 1070-1077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1070)
  28. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1986), "The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear", J. Am. Concrete Inst., 83(2), 219-231.
  29. Vecchio, F.J. and Shim, W. (2004), "Experimental and analytical reexamination of classic concrete beam tests", J. Struct. Eng., 130(3), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:3(460)
  30. Vesely, V., Sobek, J., Malikova, L., Frantik, P. and Seitl, S. (2013), "Multi-parameter crack tip stress state description for estimation of fracture process zone extent in silicate composite WST specimens", Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 25, 69-78.
  31. Vos, E. (1983), "Influence of loading rate and radial pressure on bond in reinforced concrete", Ph.D. Dissertation, Delft University, 219-220.
  32. Willam, K. and Tanabe, T. (2001), "Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures", ACI Special Publication, No. SP-205, 399.
  33. Yu, T., Teng, J.G., Wong, Y.L. and Dong, S.L. (2010), "Correspondence address finite element modelling of confined concrete-I: Drucker-Prager type plasticity model", Eng. Struct., 32(3), 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.014

Cited by

  1. Punching Shear Failure of Concrete Ground Supported Slab vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0263-6
  2. Mechanical properties of concrete with small fibre for numerical modelling vol.596, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/596/1/012036
  3. Experiments on Fiber Concrete Foundation Slabs in Interaction with the Subsoil vol.12, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093939
  4. Identification of Fracture Mechanic Properties of Concrete and Analysis of Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams without Transverse Reinforcement vol.13, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122788
  5. Numerical Modeling and Analysis of Concrete Slabs in Interaction with Subsoil vol.12, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239868
  6. Elasto-Damage constitutive modelling of recycled aggregate concrete vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.28.1.013