Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The need for DICOM encapsulation of 3D scanning STL data

  • Hwang, Jae Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung, Yun-Hoa (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Bong-Hae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.09.23
  • Accepted : 2018.10.05
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  2. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
  3. Mustra M, Delac K, Grgic M. Overview of the DICOM standard. 50th International Symposium ELMAR-2008; 2008 Sep 10-12; Zadar, Croatia. Berlin; Springer; 2008. p. 39-44.
  4. Schutze B, Kroll M, Geisbe T, Filler TJ. Patient data security in the DICOM standard. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51: 286-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.08.001
  5. Juneja M, Thakur N, Kumar D, Gupta A, Bajwa B, Jindal P. Accuracy in dental surgical guide fabrication using different 3-D printing techniques. Addit Manuf 2018; 22: 243-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.012
  6. Carneiro Junior JT, de Moraes PH, de Oliveira DV, Carneiro NCM. Custom-made titanium miniplates associated with ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene graft in orthognathic surgery: an adjunct to maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76: 1091.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.01.018
  7. Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W. Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45: 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.009
  8. Hiller JD, Lipson H. STL 2.0: a proposal for a universal multimaterial additive manufacturing file format [Internet]. Autstin: Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin [cited 2018 Oct 6]. Available from: http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2009/2009-23-Hiller.pdf.
  9. McHenry K, Bajcsy P. An overview of 3D data content, file formats and viewers. Urbana (IL): National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Image Spatial Data Analysis Group; 2008 Oct 31. Report No.: isda08-002.
  10. Bajcsy P, Kooper R, Marini L, McHenry K, Ondrejecek M. A framework for understanding file format conversions. Proceedings of the 2010 Roadmap for Digital Preservation Interoperability Framework Workshop; 2010 Mar 29-31; Gaithersburg, USA. New York: ACM. Artiocle No. 10.
  11. Bathala LR, Rachuri NK, Rayapati SR, Kondaka S. Prosthodontics an "arsenal" in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016; 8: 173.
  12. DICOM Standards Committee (US). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine PS3.2 2018d: Conformance. Virginia: The Committee. 2018. Avaliable from: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part02.html
  13. DICOM Standards Committee (US). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine PS3.3 2018d: Information Object Definitions. Virginia: The Committee. 2018. Avaliable from: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part03.html
  14. Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 2014; 24: 313-21.
  15. Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent (in press).
  16. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1289-96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
  17. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Bosmans H, Schulze R. Future prospects for dental cone beam CT imaging. Imaging Med 2012; 4: 551-63. https://doi.org/10.2217/iim.12.45

Cited by

  1. Linear Accuracy of Full-Arch Digital Models Using Four Different Scanning Methods: An In Vitro Study Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine vol.10, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082741