정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.113-122
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학습자의 컴퓨터 문제해결 선호방법 분석

Analysis of Learners' Preferences for Computer Solving Methods

  • 박선주 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Park, Sunju (Dept. of Computer Science Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.19
  • 심사 : 2018.02.21
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

성공적인 학습 성과를 위해 동료 학습자간의 상호 협력 및 도움은 매우 중요한 요소이지만 학생들은 점점 혼자 해결하려는 경향이 나타나므로 학생들의 컴퓨터 문제해결 선호 방법 및 상호 관계성 등을 조사하여 이에 관한 학생들의 생각을 파악하고 학생들에게 알맞은 실습지도를 할 필요가 있다. 그러므로 본 논문에서는 K교육대학교 학생 231명을 대상으로 컴퓨터 사용 중 어려움을 겪을 때 선호하는 해결 방법 및 학생들 상호 관계성을 분석한 결과, 컴퓨터 사용 중 어려움 발생정도가 적을수록 컴퓨터 활용능력이 높을수록 학년이 올라갈수록 스스로 해결하는 방법을 선호하였다. 그리고 가족 및 친척 등 친밀도가 높은 혈연관계에게 직접 물어보는 방법과 인터넷을 활용하여 스스로 해결하는 방법에 만족도가 높았다. 또한, 학과동기생 사회연결망 분석을 통해 학과 안에서 컴퓨터 문제해결 관계망을 파악할 수 있어 동료 학습자 선정시 참고자료로 활용할 수 있으므로 개인별 맞춤형 컴퓨터 교육실습 운영에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

Collaboration and assistance among peer learners are essential factors for successful learning outcomes. However it is important to investigate students' preferences for computer problem solving methods and interrelationships, since students tend to solve problems more and more by themselves. This is because of the importance of giving appropriate instructions to students. In this context, this paper shows the analysis of the preferred methods and interrelationships of studnets' preferences upon encountering difficulties during computer usage by collecting data from 231 students in K national university of education. As a result, the result shows that students tend to solve problems without asking as they have higher abilities in computer usage, which was also shown to increase along with their grade levels. Furthermore, it showed that students who have family members and relatives, and who are using the internet are more satisfied with their problem solving. Lastly, it is possible to grasp the computer problem solving network within the department by using social network analysis, so it can be used as reference data for selecting the peer learners, which will help to operate the customized computer education practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Pedagogy (3rd edition). New York: Pearson Education.
  2. Byongsu Choi, Sangmi Yoo (2013). Investigation of H model blended e-learning technique in enhanced effectiveness of class learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(3), 49-60.
  3. Choongkyo Jeong (2017). Effects of Pair Programming in an Introductory Programming Course for College Students : Academic Performance and Student Satisfaction. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(5), 537-545. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.5.537
  4. EunBok Lee, OkHwa Lee, SoonSun Jang (2015). The Feasibility Study of the Use of Self-evaluation and Peer-evaluation in a Computer Practice Class at Higher Education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(1), 65-89.
  5. EunSoon Kim, ByungHo Park, HeeOk Heo (2004). The Effects of Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Peer Relationship in Programming Language Learning. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 7(4), 111-120.
  6. Heasook Park (2014). A Case Study on the Activity of Self-Initiated Learning of Computer Graphics Classes with Peer Tutoring. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 15(2), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2014.15.2.191
  7. HyeJin Kim, MimiBong, SungHee Park (2009). Effects of Pairing Strategies for Peer Tutoring on Self-Efficacy, Performance, and Satisfaction Toward Computer Use in Middle School Computer Classes. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 187-212.
  8. Jeongrang Kim (2016). Effects of Pair Programming on Creative Problem-Solving Ability and Efficiency. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 20(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.1.21
  9. Jiyoung Han, Eunhwa Lee (2010). Learner's perception and Learning Satisfaction on e-learning in the University Blended Learning Environment. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(6), 69-77.
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1997). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice_Hall.
  11. Jongjung Woo, et al. (2009). A Study on the Blended Learning as An Alternative of Face-to-Face Learning in University. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 7(2), 219-225.
  12. Kyoungho Choi, JinAh Yoo (2015). A reviews on the social network analysis using R. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.1.077
  13. Kyungmi Kim, Hyunsook Kim (2017). A Study on Customized Software Education method using Flipped Learning in the Digital Age, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(7), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.55
  14. ManHee Lee (2013). Computer Education Curriculum and Instru ction : Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Satisfaction: Focused on Application Practices in Computer Operating System Lab Education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(3), 61-70.
  15. Miyoung Kim, Wonsik Choi (2006). A Case Study on the Design and Operation of Blended Learning in Engineering College Instruction - Focus on Class Operation of C University-. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 9(3), 37-48.
  16. Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464
  17. Piaget, J. (1970). The science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
  18. SeoJeong Heo, SonDong Cheul, ChangSuk Kim (2017). Learning Effect Analysis for Flipped Learning based Computer Use Instruction. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(1), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.1.155
  19. Shinnam Lee (2010). A Study on the Effects of Blended Learning on Satisfaction and Academic Achievement. Korean Academic Society of Accounting, 15(3), 113-131.
  20. Storch, N., & Aldosari, M. (2010). Learners' use of first language in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362
  21. Sungjin Jang (2017). Design of Effective Teaching-Learning Method in Algorithm theory Subject using Flipped Learning. Journal of the Korea Institute Of Information and Communication Engineering, 21(5), 1042-1048. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2017.21.5.1042
  22. SunJu Park (2018). Trend Analysis of Computer Problem Solving by Grades. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(1), 67-72.
  23. Vygotsky (1978). The Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological presesses. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
  24. Wanseop Kim (2015). Analysis of Student Satisfaction Survey on Computer Practice Subject by Applying Blended Learning. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 19(3), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.373
  25. Webb, N, M. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475
  26. Youngho Seo, Jonghoon Kim (2017). The effect of SW education applying Design Thinking on creativity of elementary school pre-service teachers. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.351