DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumers' Perceptions and Valuation of an Organic Chicken in Malawi

유기농 닭에 대한 말라위 소비자 인식 및 가치 추정

  • Shaba, Samson M. (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Se-Hyun (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Pusan National University) ;
  • Chung, Won-Ho (Department of Food and Resource Economics, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2018.01.04
  • Accepted : 2018.02.13
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

In general, an increase in consumer income increases interest in safe foods and increases consumption of environmental friendly foods. Meanwhile, even in Malawi, interest in safe food and environmentally friendly food has been increasing due to increase in per capita income, but research related to this has not been done yet. The purpose of this study is to estimate the value of environmentally friendly foods in Malawi consumers. For this purpose, we surveyed the consumption patterns and estimated the value of organic chicken for consumers visiting supermarkets. As a value estimation technique, Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) was used. Probit model analysis showed that price, expenditure on regular chicken, and knowledge of organic food affect the willingness to pay for organic chicken. CVM analysis shows that Malawi supermarket consumers are willing to pay MK2,514 (3.59) dollars per kilo of organic chicken, which is 25.7% higher than the average price of a regular chicken. Thus, Malawi supermarket consumers can deduce that they have a higher value for environmentally friendly food than regular food. These findings can be used in formulating policies on food safety by government officials, organic chicken meat marketing strategies by supermarket mangers, decision making to enhance organic food production by producers, in order to develop organic food industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Bridgeman, B. C. and J. L. Lusk. 2011. Preferences for Fairness and Equity in the Food System. European. Review of Agricultural Economics. 38: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq033
  2. Grunert, K. G. 2006. Future Trends and Consumer Lifestyles with Regard to Meat Consumption. Meat Science. 74(1): 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016
  3. Han, S. Y., T. K. Kim, and K. Choi. 2000. Measuring the Preservation Value for Endangered Wildlife in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics. 4: 23-24.
  4. Hanemann, W. M. 1984. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66: 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  5. Kumar S. and S. Managi. 2009. The Economics of Sustainable Development. Natural Resource Management and Policy 32: 123.
  6. Loureiro, M. L. and W. J. Umberger. 2007. A Choice Experiment Model for Beef: What U. S. Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety, Country of Origin Labelling and Traceability. Food Policy. 32(4): 496-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006