대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제34권11호
  • /
  • Pages.125-134
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소통공간의 관점에서 고찰한 "움직임의 건축" - 자하 하디드의 설계이론과 작품 사례연구 -

"The Architecture of Movement" Considered in the Viewpoint of Communicative Space - A Case Study of Zaha Hadid's Design Theory and Practice -

  • Seo, Jeongil (Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.17
  • 심사 : 2018.10.11
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study examines Dalibor Vesely's theoretical proposition of communicative space and tries to develop it through a review of the contemporary architectural case. Vesely poses a critical question about communication: how do the situational conditions of our everyday life and the spatial characteristics of the natural world in which we live communicate through representation. He emphasizes the spatial and situational conditions and the role of representation in communication, arguing that architecture should create the formation of communicative space to restore its primary role as the corporeal foundation of culture. This study thus focuses on one of the critical concepts of his theory: "the communicative movement," which is, according to him, ontological and situational because it animates and transforms human circumstances as a whole. Further, it pursues some practical knowledge of creating the communicative space, by examining the design theory and practice of Zaha Hadid, who thematizes communication and movement in her architectural approach. This study analyses the different levels of representation and modes of movement in her architectural space to reveal the possibilities and limits of its communicative roles. We will find that the representation of Hadid's architectural space is not the formal representation of reality, but a mathematical and projective representation of abstract concepts. Despite its apparent aesthetic consistency, the inward and self-referential relation between the individual elements of the architectural space reveals its limit for the communicative space.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ARENDT, H. (1998). The Human Condition, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Blundell Jones, P. & Meagher M. (2015). Architecture and Movement: the Dynamic Experience of Buildings and Landscapes, Abingdon, Routledge.
  3. Brittain-Catlin, T. (2016). Architecture and Movement: the Dynamic Experience of Buildings and Landscapes, The Journal of Architecture (21:3), 465-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1181840
  4. Choi, W., Chung, J., Goo, B., Kim, I., Kim, J., Hwuang, D., Seo, J., Shim, Y. & Yang, S. (2013). Communicating Architecture in the Public Arena, Architecture(建築) (57:5), 13-46.
  5. Forty, A. (1997). Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture, London, Thames and Hudson.
  6. Gehlen, A. (1988). Man, His Nature and Place in the World, Trans. Macmillan, C. & Pilliner, K., New York, Columbia University Press.
  7. Gehlen, A. (1964). Urmensch und Spatkultur: Philosophische Ergebnisse und Aussagen, Frankfurt am Main-Bonn, Athenaum Verlag.
  8. Hadid, Z. (2004). Zaha Hadid 1983-2004 (El Croquis 52+73+103), El Escorial, El Croquis.
  9. Hardy, A. (2011). The Expression of Movement in Architecture. The Journal of Architecture (16:4), 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2011.598698
  10. Jodidio, P. (2012). Zaha Hadid, Koln, Tachen.
  11. Palladio, A. (1570). I quattro libri dell'architettura, Venetia, Appresso Dominico de' Franceschi.
  12. Pallasmaa, J. (1996). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, London, Academy Editions.
  13. Pallasmaa, J. (1994). An Architecture of the Seven Senses. In Holl, S., Pallasmaa, J. & Perez-Gomez, A. eds., Questions of Perception: Phenomenology of Architecture, special issue of Architecture and Urbanism, Tokyo, A+U.
  14. Park, S., Kim, K., & Chon, B.K. (2013). A Study on the Fluidity Expressed in Zaha Hadid's MAXXI from the Perspective of Bergson's Fluid Concepts, AIK Journal (29:4), 13-20.
  15. Schumacher, P. (1996). Architektur der Bewegung. In ARCH+ (134/135).
  16. Vesely, D. (2002). The Architectonics of Embodiment. In G. Dodds & R. Tavernor (Eds.), Body and Building: Essays on the Changing Relation of Body and Architecture. Cambridge, MIT Press.
  17. Vesely, D. (2002). Space, Simulation and Disembodiment in Contemporary Architecture. The Visible and the Invisible, OASE (58), 59-74.
  18. Vesely, D. (2004). Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production, Cambridge, MIT Press.