DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Spatial Characteristics forming 'Place Attachment' in Child Care Facilities - By Focusing the analysis of Senda Mitsuru's Child Care Facilities -

아동보육시설에서 '장소애착'을 형성하는 공간적 특성에 관한 연구 - 센다미츠루의 아동보육시설 분석을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2018.07.10
  • Accepted : 2018.11.15
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

During the course of play, children gain special experience in a place where they can explore their surrounding environment and feel emotional stability. This experience of attachment to the place of play is very important in that play can serve as a measurement of the child's growth and development. Therefore, the environment surrounding the child should be understood as a meaningful place that affects a child's life beyond the place of play. The purpose of this study is to propose a spatial planning method where the formation of place attachment is considered in the design of child care facilities, as this is where preschool children spend much of their early formative years. The research methods are as follow: First, we surveyed the relationship between child development and place attachment through literature reviews and found that the factors that form place attachment were summarized as accessibility, complexity, segmentation and nature friendliness. Second, we examined the spatial characteristics of Mitsuru Senda, a Japanese architect who has been intensively studying children's play environments, as well as the characteristics of children's play proposed by his academic research. Finally, we analyzed the relationship between the spatial characteristics supporting play shown in Senda's work, and the four factors of place attachment formation and proposed a planning method for space design applicable to child care facilities.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Pearce, C. (1977). Magical Child, New York: Dutton.
  2. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness, London: Pion
  3. Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Cobb, E. (1959). The Ecology of Imagination in Childhood: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences. 537-548
  5. Corcoran, M. P. (2002). Place attachment and community sentiment in marginalised neighbourhoods: A European case study. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 11(1), 47-67.
  6. Heidegger, M. (1958). An Ontological Consideration of Place in the Question of Being, New York: Twayne Publishers.
  7. Marcus, C. (1992). Environmental memories, In I. Altman & M. Low (eds.), Place Attachment. New York: Plenum Press. 87.
  8. Moore, R., & Young, D. (1978). Childhood outdoors: Toward a social ecology of the landscape. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 3, Children and the Environment, New York: Plenum. 83-127
  9. Luce, R. (1959). Choice Behavior, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 138-140.
  10. Senda, M. (2009). こどものためのあそび空間
  11. Spencer, C. (2005). Place attachment, place identity and the development of the child's seif-identity: Searching the literature to develop an hypothesis. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(4), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040508668363
  12. Min, B. (2001). Our lost raputa: Site design for children, Sejinsa, 22-24
  13. Lee, S. (2008). An analysis of outdoor space in elementary school design based on the possibility of forming a sense of place for children, Korean Institute of Educational Facelities, 15(5), 13.