Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제31권1호
  • /
  • Pages.98-105
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of processing, particle size and moisturizing of sorghum-based feeds on pellet quality and broiler production

  • 투고 : 2017.06.22
  • 심사 : 2017.09.12
  • 발행 : 2018.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of pelleted and expanded sorghum-based feeds prepared with different moisture levels and particle size of ingredients on metabolizable energy, ileal digestibility of amino acids and broiler performance. Methods: The experiment was performed with 720 male broiler chicks of the Cobb strain, with treatments of six replications, with 15 birds each; they were arranged in a completely randomized design and $2{\times}2{\times}2$ factorial scheme (pelleted or expanded feed processing, 0.8% or 1.6% moisture addition in the mixer, and particle size of 650 or 850 microns). Results: Higher pellet quality (pellets, % and pellet durability index [PDI]) was obtained in expanded diets and inclusion of 1.6% moisture. The particle size of 850 microns increased the PDI of final diet. All studied treatments had no significant effect on weight gain and broiler carcass and cut yields. Lower feed conversion occurred for birds fed pelleted feed at 42 d. The highest apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and apparent metabolizable energy corrected to zero nitrogen balance (AMEn) values of feed in the initial rearing phase (10 to 13 days) were observed in birds fed pelleted feed or for feed prepared with 1.6% moisture. The highest ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids were obtained with the consumption of pelleted feed prepared with a particle size of 650 microns and 1.6% moisture. Conclusion: Pelleted feed prepared with a milling particle size of 650 microns and 1.6% moisture provided increased ileal digestibility of amino acids and AMEn in the starter period. However, the expanded feed improved pellet quality and feed conversion of broilers at 42 days of age. We conclude that factors such as moisture, particle size and processing affect the pellet quality, and therefore should be considered when attempting to optimize broiler performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdollahi, MR, Ravindran V, Wester TJ, Ravindran G, Thomas DV. Influence of conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolisable energy, ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen and the quality of pellets, in broiler starters fed maize-and sorghum-based diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;162:106-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.017
  2. Lopez CAA, Baiao NC, Lara LJC, Rodriguez NM, Cancado SV. Effects of physical form of ration on feed digestibility and performance of broiler chickens. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2007;59;1006-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352007000400029
  3. Nir I, Shefet G, Aroni Y. Effect of particle size on performance. 1. Corn. Poult Sci 1994;73:45-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730045
  4. Muramatsu K, Maiorka A, Vaccari ICM, et al. Impact of particle size, thermal processing, fat inclusion and moisture addition on pellet quality and protein solubility of broiler feeds. J Agric Sci Technol 2014;16:1017-28.
  5. Chewning CG, Stark CR, Brake J. Effects of particle size and feed form on broiler performance. J Appl Poult Res 2012;21:830-7. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00553
  6. Thomas M, Van Der Poel AFB. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 1. Criteria for pellet quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;61: 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00949-2
  7. Buchanan NP, Moritz JS. Main effects and interactions of varying formulation protein, fiber, and moisture on feed manufacture and pellet quality. J Appl Poult Res 2009;18:274-83. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00089
  8. Test Sieving: Principles and Procedures [Internet]. Advantech Manufacturing, Inc.; 2001 [cited 2017 july 19]. Avaliable from http://www.espanol-advantechmfg.com/pdf/principles_procedures_manual_with_tables-2.pdf
  9. Froetschner, J. Conditioning controls quality of pellet. Feed Tech 2006;10:12-5.
  10. Lowe, R. Judging pellet stability as part of pellet quality. Feed Tech 2005;9:15-9.
  11. Matterson LD, Potter LM, Stutz MW, Singsen EP. The metabolizable energy of feed ingredients for chickens. Storrs, CT, USA: The University of Connecticut, Agricultural Experiment Station; 1965. p. 11. Research Report. 7.
  12. Sakomura NK, Rostagno HS. Research methods in monogastric nutrition. 2th ed. Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil: Funep; 2016. p. 282.
  13. Scott TA, Boldaji F. Comparison of inert markers (chormic oxide or insoluble ash [CeliteTM]) for determining apparent metabolizable energy of wheat-or barley-based broiler diets with or without enzymes. Poult Sci 1997;76:594-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.4.594
  14. Detmann E, Souza MA, Valadares Filho SC et al. Metodos para analise de alimentos. Visconde do Rio Branco, Brazil: Suprema; 2012.
  15. Santos FR, Hruby M, Pierson EEM, Remus JC, Sakomura NK. Effect of phytase supplementation in diets on nutrient digestibility and performance in broiler chicks. J Appl Poult Res 2008;17:191-201.
  16. Ferreira DF. 2014. Sisvar: a guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Cienc Agrotec 2014;38:109-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001
  17. Parsons AS, Buchanan NP, Blemings KP, Wilson ME, Moritz JS. Effect of corn particle size and pellet texture on broiler performance in the growing phase. J Appl Poult Res 2006;15:245-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.2.245
  18. Thomas M, Van der Poe. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 1. Criteria for pellet quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;61:89-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00949-2
  19. Franke M, Rey A. Improving pellet quality and efficiency. Feed Tech 2006;10:5-12.
  20. Amerah AM, Ravindran V, Lentle RG, Thomas DG. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poult Sci J 2007;63:439-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001560
  21. Plavnik I, Sklan D. Nutritional effects of expansion and short time extrusion on feeds for broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;55:247-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00792-L
  22. Zimonja O, Hetland H, Lazarevic N, Edvardsen DH, Svihus B. Effects of fibre content in pelleted wheat and oat diets on technical pellet quality and nutritional value for broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci 2008;88:613-22. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS08019
  23. Taylor JRN, Dewar J. Developments in sorghum food technologies. Adv Food Nutr Res 2001;43:217-64.
  24. Selle PH, Cadogan DJ, Li X, Bryden WL. Implications of sorghum in broiler chicken nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;156:57-74.
  25. Bryden WL, Li X, Ravindran G, Ll H, Ravindran V. Ileal digestible amino acid values in feedstuffs for poultry. RIRDC; 2009. no. 09/071. p. 76.
  26. Svihus B, Zimonja O. Chemical alterations with nutritional consequences due to pelleting animal feeds: a review. Anim Prod Sci 2011; 51:590-6.
  27. Surek D, Maiorka A, Dalke F, et al. Phytase use in diet with different particle size for broiler chicken at initial stage. Cienc Rural 2008;38:1725-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000600036
  28. Amezcua CM, Parsons CM. Effect of increased heat processing and particle size on phosphorus bioavailability in corn distillers dried grains with solubles. Poult Sci 2007;86:331-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.331
  29. Boroojeni FG, Mader A, Knorr F, et al. The effects of different thermal treatments and organic acid levels on nutrient digestibility in broilers. Poult Sci 2014;93:1159-71.
  30. Lundblad KK, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, et al. The effect of adding water into the mixer on pelleting efficiency and pellet quality in diets for finishing pigs without and with use of an expander. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009;150:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.10.006
  31. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Wester TJ, Ravindran G, Thomas DV. Influence of feed form and conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broiler starters fed wheat-based diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;168:88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.014
  32. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V, Wester TJ, Ravindran G, Thomas DV. Effect of improved pellet quality from the addition of a pellet binder and/or moisture to a wheat-based diet conditioned at two different temperatures on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;175:150-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.05.001
  33. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran AV, Svihus B. Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;179:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.10.011
  34. Zang JJ, Piao XS, Huang DS, et al. Effects of feed particle size and feed form on growth performance, nutrient metabolizability and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2009;22: 107-12. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80352

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of grain particle size on energy values and chemical components of diets for Label Rouge broilers vol.51, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200410