DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Evaluation of Online Health Information Related to Young Child

영유아 온라인 건강정보의 질 평가

  • Received : 2017.12.18
  • Accepted : 2018.01.16
  • Published : 2018.01.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to evaluate the quality of online health information related to infants and preschoolers accessible through mobile applications and websites. Methods: Using combinations of the terms 'infant', 'preschooler', and 'health' as the main keyword or categories, the researchers searched relevant mobile applications and websites in Korean application markets and popular search engines. Twelve mobile application and 14 websites were finally selected according to our inclusion criteria and evaluated using DISCERN instrument. Results: The overall quality score of online health information available through mobile applications was 2.00 of 5 points, the reliability score was 2.15, and the quality score was 1.76. The overall quality score of online health information available through websites was 2.29, the reliability score was 2.40, and the quality score was 1.82. Conclusion: The quality of online health information related to young children was found to be low and to have potentially significant drawbacks according to DISCERN criteria. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a system to evaluate and regulate the quality of online health information. Additionally, factors that readers can use to judge the quality of health information, such as references and the benefit versus risks of the information, should be provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2016 Survey on the internet usage summary [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Internet & Security Agency; 2017 [cited 2017 July 1]. Available from: https://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/?pageId=060100&bbsId=7&itemId=818&searchKey=&searchTxt=&pageIndex=1.
  2. Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2015 Survey on the mobile internet usage summary [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Internet & Security Agency; 2016 [cited 2017 July 1]. Available from: http://isis.kisa.or.kr/board/?pageId=060100&bbsId=7&itemId=809&pageIndex=1.
  3. Sethuram R, Weerakkody ANA. Health information on the internet. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;30(2):119-121. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443610903440927
  4. BinDhim NF, Hawkey A, Trevena L. A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. Telemedicine and E-Health. 2015;21(2):97-104. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0088
  5. Bert F, Giacometti M, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. Smartphones and health promotion: A review of the evidence. Journal of Medical Systems. 2014;38(1):9995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9995-7
  6. Scullard P, Peacock C, Davies P. Googling children's health: Reliability of medical advice on the internet. Archives of Disease in Child. 2010;95(8):580-582. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.168856
  7. Quintana Y, Feightner JW, Wathen CN, Sangster LM, Marshall JN. Preventive health information on the internet. qualitative study of consumers' perspectives. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien. 2001;47(9):1759-1765.
  8. Walsh A, Edwards H, Fraser J. Influences on parents' fever management: Beliefs, experiences and information sources. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;16(12):2331-2340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01890.x
  9. Yoo KH. The educational needs of a mother when nurturing children. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2000;30(4):905-916. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2000.30.4.905
  10. Kim SJ, Lee JM, Min HY. A survey of smartphone-based health education needs for parents. Child Health Nursing Research. 2016; 22(4):346-354. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2016.22.4.346
  11. Khoo K, Bolt P, Babl FE, Jury S, Goldman RD. Health information seeking by parents in the internet age. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2008;44(7-8):419-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01322.x
  12. Pehora C, Gajaria N, Stoute M, Fracassa S, Serebale-O'Sullivan R, Matava CT. Are parents getting it right? a survey of parents' internet use for children's health care information. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2015;4(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3790
  13. Betsch C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T, Ulshofer C. The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. Journal of Health Psychology. 2010;15(3):446-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309353647
  14. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm-an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the antivaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012;30(25):3778-3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
  15. Kang BC. The challenge left for us by Anaki. Healthcare Policy Forum. 2017;15(3):8-14.
  16. Jeong YS, Kim JS. Evaluation of internet information on childhood fever management. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2012;12(12):702-713. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.12.702
  17. Kim BK, Park SH, Sung HU, Park SY, Kwon YS, Jun YH, et al. Evaluation of information of websites on precocious puberty. Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;17(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2012.17.1.27
  18. Han KJ, Kim JS, Kim SY. The evaluation of the child-care web sites on the internet. Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing. 2006;12 (1):57-64.
  19. Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet. Patient Education and Counseling. 2003;50(2):151-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00124-6
  20. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
  21. Park JH, Cho BL, Kim YI, Shin YS, Kim Y. Assessing the quality of internet health information using DISCERN. Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics. 2005;11(3):235-246.
  22. Hunter PV, Delbaere M, O'Connell ME, Cammer A, Seaton JX, Friedrich T, et al. Did online publishers "get it right"? using a naturalistic search strategy to review cognitive health promotion content on internet webpages. BioMed Central Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0515-3
  23. Kiran DP, Bargale S, Pandya P, Bhatt K, Barad N, Shah N, et al. Evaluation of health on the net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2015;7(6):481-485. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.163509
  24. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2004;7(5):497-510. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497
  25. Choi EJ. Policy development for adolescent mental health promotion. Health and Welfare Policy Forum. 2012:78-86.
  26. Lewin ME, Baxter RJ. America's health care safety net: Revisiting the 2000 IOM report. Health Affairs. 2007;26(5):1490-1494. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1490
  27. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett RL, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: Principles governing AMA web sites. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;283(12):1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.12.1600
  28. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;297(8): 842-857. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.842
  29. Kim JS. Childhood fever management: Current practice vs evidence. Child Health Nursing Research. 2016;22(2):126-136. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2016.22.2.126
  30. Schiavo R. Health communication: From theory to practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 33-82.

Cited by

  1. 영유아 어머니의 기저귀 발진에 대한 지식 및 기저귀 관리 실태 vol.25, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.2.112
  2. Needs for Post-hospital Education among Parents of Infants and Toddlers with Congenital Heart Disease vol.26, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2020.26.1.107
  3. 영유아 어머니의 발열관리 인터넷 정보 획득과 발열관리 지식 및 수행 간의 관계 vol.26, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2020.26.2.190
  4. 영유아 부모의 인터넷 건강정보 추구행동 영향요인 vol.19, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.4.403