DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic response analysis of mega-scale buckling-restrained bracing systems in tall buildings

  • Gholipour, Mohammadreza (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University) ;
  • Mazloom, Moosa (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University)
  • Received : 2017.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.01.19
  • Published : 2018.01.25

Abstract

Tall buildings are categorized as important structures because of the large number of occupants and high construction costs. The choice of competent lateral load resisting systems in tall buildings is of crucial importance. Bracing systems have long been an economic and effective method for resisting lateral loads in steel structures. However, there are some potential adverse aspects to bracing systems such as the limitations they inflict on architectural plans, uplift forces and poor performances in compression. in order to eliminate the mentioned problems and for cost optimization, in this paper, six 20-story steel buildings and frames with different types of bracing, i.e., conventional, mega-scale and buckling-restrained bracing (BRB) were analyzed. Linear and modal push-over analyses were carried out. The results pointed out that Mega-Scale Bracing (MSB) system has significant superiority over the conventional bracing type. The MSB system is 25% more economic. Some other advantages of MSB include: up to 63% less drift ratio, up to 38% better performance in lateral displacement, up to 100% stiffer stories, and about 50% smaller uplift forces. Moreover, MSB equipped with BRB attests even a better seismic behavior in the aforementioned parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Asgarian, B., Golsefidi, E.S. and Shokrgozar, H.R. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames using DCFD and PSDA methods", Earthq. Struct., 10(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.1.105
  2. Assaleh, K., AlHamaydeh, M. and Choudhary, I. (2015), "Modeling nonlinear behavior of Buckling-Restrained Braces via different artificial intelligence methods", Appl. Soft Comput., 37, 923-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.014
  3. Bazaez, R. and Dusicka, P. (2016), "Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge bent retrofitted with buckling restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 119, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.010
  4. Bosco, M., Marino, E. and Rossi, P. (2015), "Design of steel frames equipped with BRBs in the framework of Eurocode 8", J. Constr. Steel Res., 113, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.016
  5. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R. and Casagrande, L. (2016), "Seismic analysis of high-rise mega-braced frame-core buildings", Eng. Struct., 115, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.019
  6. Choi, H. and Kim, J. (2006), "Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.008
  7. Fahnestock, L.A., Sause, R., Ricles, J.M. and Lu, L.W. (2003), "Ductility demands on buckling-restrained braced frames under earthquake loading", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 2(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-003-0009-5
  8. Fan, H., Li, Q., Tuan, A.Y. and Xu, L. (2009), "Seismic analysis of the world's tallest building", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(5), 1206-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.10.005
  9. Flogeras, A.K. and Papagiannopoulos, G.A. (2017), "On the seismic response of steel buckling-restrained braced structures including soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 12(4), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.4.469
  10. Ghowsi, A.F. and Sahoo, D.R. (2013), "Seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames with varying beam-column connections", Int. J. Steel Struct., 13(4), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-013-4003-0
  11. Ghowsi, A.F. and Sahoo, D.R. (2015), "Performance of medium-rise buckling-restrained braced frame under near field earthquakes", Adv. Struct. Eng., 2, 841-854.
  12. Guerrero, H., Ji, T., Teran-Gilmore, A. and Escobar, J.A. (2016), "A method for preliminary seismic design and assessment of low-rise structures protected with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 123, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.015
  13. Jia, M., Zhang, S. and Lu, D. (2010), "Stability performance of buckling-restrained brace with brace joints", Transactions of Tianjin Univ., 16(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-010-0015-4
  14. Khampanit, A., Leelataviwat, S., Kochanin, J. and Warnitchai, P. (2014), "Energy-based seismic strengthening design of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames using buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 81, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.033
  15. Kim, J. and Lee, Y.H. (2010), "Seismic performance evaluation of diagrid system buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 21(10), 736-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.643
  16. Lee, D.K., Starossek, U. and Shin, S.M. (2010), "Optimized topology extraction of steel-framed DiaGrid structure for tall buildings", Int. J. Steel Struct., 10(2), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03215827
  17. Levene, D. (2014), The Guardian. [Online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014 /aug/13/london-office-evolution-lloyds-leadenhall-cheesegrater [Accessed 13 08 2014].
  18. Lopez-Almansa, F., Castro-Medina, J. and Oller, S. (2012), "A numerical model of the structural behavior of buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 41, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.045
  19. Lu, X., Xie, L., Yu, C. and Lu, X. (2016), "Development and application of a simplified model for the design of a super-tall mega-braced frame-core tube building", Eng. Struct., 110, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.039
  20. Mazloom, M. (2007), "Comparing static linear and nonlinear analyses of safe rooms in a poor performance masonry building", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures Bologna, Italy, June.
  21. Mazloom, M. (2008), "Pushover, response spectrum and time history analyses of safe rooms in a poor performance masonry building", Proceedings of the Seismic Engineering International Conference, Messina and Reggio Calabria, Italy, July.
  22. Mazzolani, F.M., Corte, G.D. and D'Aniello, M. (2009), "Experimental analysis of steel dissipative bracing systems for seismic upgrading", J. Civil Eng. Management, 15(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.7-19
  23. Midorikawa, M. et al. (2012), "Cyclic behaviour of buckling-restrained braces using steel mortar planks; Buckling mode number and strength ratio", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
  24. Moon, K.S., Connor, J.J. and Fernandez, J.E. (2007), "Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: characteristics and methodology for preliminary design", Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 16(2), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.311
  25. Moon, K.S. (2012), "Sustainable design of diagrid structural systems for tall nuildings", Int. J. Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.5390/SUSB.2011.2.1.037
  26. Newell, J., Uang, C.M. and Benzoni, G. (2006), "Subassemblage testing of corebrace buckling-restrained braces (G SERIES)", San Diego: Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego .
  27. Piedrafita, D., Cahis, X., Simon, E. and Comas, J. (2015), "A new perforated core buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 85, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.020
  28. Piedrafita, D., Maimi, P. and Cahis, X. (2015), "A constitutive model for a novel modular all-steel buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 100, 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.026
  29. Sahoo, D.R. and Chao, S.H. (2010), "Performance-based plastic design method for buckling-restrained braced frames", Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2950-2958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.014
  30. Smith, B.S. and Coull, A. (1991), Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  31. Sutcu, F., Takeuchi, T. and Matsui, R. (2014), "Seismic retrofit design method for RC buildings using buckling-restrained braces and steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 101, 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.023
  32. Tabatabaei, S.A.R., Mirghaderi, S.R. and Hosseini, A. (2014), "Experimental and numerical developing of reduced length buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 77, 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.034
  33. Takeuchi, T., Ida, M., Yamada, S. and Suzuki, K. (2008), "Estimation of cumulative deformation capacity of buckling restrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., 134(5), 822-831. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:5(822)
  34. Takeuchi, T., Ozaki, H., Matsui, R. and Sutcu, F. (2013), "Out-of-plane stability of buckling-restrained braces including moment transfer capacity", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 43(6), 851-869. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2376
  35. Tsai, K.C., Lin, P.C., Tsai, C.Y. and Wu, A.C. (2014), "Pseudo-dynamic performance evaluation of full Scale seismic steel braced frames using buckling-restrained and in-plane buckling braces", Performance-Based Seismic Engineering: Vision for an Earthquake Resilient Society, 32, 237-249.
  36. Usami, T., Ge, H. and Kasai, A. (2008), "Overall buckling prevention condition of buckling-restrained braces as a structural control damper", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  37. Usami, T., Ge, H. and Luo, X.Q. (2009), "Experimental and analytical study on high-performance buckling-restrained brace dampers for bridge engineering", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, San Francisco, USA.
  38. Veismoradi, S., Amiri, G.G. and Darvishan, E. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic assessment of buckling restrained braces and yielding brace systems", Int. J. Steel Struct., 16(3), 831-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-0073-5
  39. Yang, Y., Liu, R., Xue, Y. and Li, H. (2017), "Experimental study on seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames retrofitted with eccentric buckling-restrained braces (BRBs)", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.079

Cited by

  1. Evaluating inelastic performance of mega-scale bracing systems in low- and medium-rise structures vol.20, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-00112-y